2
   

Organization attempting to ban Moore's flick

 
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jun, 2004 11:52 am
kickycan wrote:
The Hamster god is my redeemer!


Does he give five cents a bottle?
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jun, 2004 11:53 am
Laughing
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jun, 2004 12:35 pm
The theatrical release will likely blow all past documentaries out of the water no matter how many screens -- it's the cable and DVD release that cannot be reckoned with. BTW, why has this movie got them shaking in their boots? Do they actually believe because they are telling everyone it's false that everyone will believe them anymore than Moore doesn't expect everyone to believe him?
0 Replies
 
thehamster
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jun, 2004 02:02 pm
Thank you fans, how bout some candy for your master?
0 Replies
 
JustanObserver
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jun, 2004 02:31 pm
This movie is going to be pretty big. After I saw the trailer (http://www.fahrenheit911.com/trailer/)I knew I had to check it out.


Anyway, regarding propaganda? It sucks.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jun, 2004 03:40 pm
I can't wait to see it!
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Jun, 2004 04:56 pm
propaganda - ha ha - another vast right wing conspiracy....
0 Replies
 
Anoxia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Jun, 2004 05:03 am
thehamster wrote:


Gosh I just love you guys from the South Laughing



And where are you from? Wink
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Jun, 2004 05:08 am
Good morning, Anoxia.

Be careful with that coffee.... it looks hot!
0 Replies
 
Anoxia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Jun, 2004 05:16 am
Top o' the mornin' to ya, gustavratzenhofer!
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Jun, 2004 05:21 am
It seems Ray Bradbury is pissed at Moore as well. Meh, won't stop me from seeing the flick and passing judgement for myself:

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/variety/20040607/va_mi/inside_move__bradbury_burned_by_1
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Jun, 2004 07:54 am
I know someone who is involved in a controversy similar to Bradbury's complaint. I think he is going to have to be satisfied with the knowledge that he contributed a concept to the culture and live with the fact that it has moved beyond him. For a science fiction writer (which is generally considered by critics to be the bottom of the literary barrel) that is quite an accomplishment.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Jun, 2004 08:52 am
Moore may have taken a clue from Mel Gibson -- the controversy is adding to ticket sales and the more the opposing side gnashes and snarls, the more people will want to go see the film (even those who disagree).
0 Replies
 
JustanObserver
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Jun, 2004 10:50 am
I heard that Moore shows the full uncut scene of Bush sitting in front of the classroom for something like 7 minutes, listening to children read AFTER he was told that America was under attack. Surreal.

That alone is why I'm going to try to get my father to see this flick with me. He's pissed at all the f*ckups of the administration for the past few months, but he STILL supports the guy. Its amazing to me.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Jun, 2004 02:08 pm
cavfancier wrote:
It seems Ray Bradbury is pissed at Moore as well. Meh, won't stop me from seeing the flick and passing judgement for myself:

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/variety/20040607/va_mi/inside_move__bradbury_burned_by_1

If Moore really copied the title without talking to Bradbury, and without any form of attribution, that's just rude. It is also completely unnecessary. I'll pay attention to the credits in the movie for a change, and if there is no credit paid to Bradbury for the title, I'll share his outrage.

But first, I'll watch the movie and see for myself.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Jun, 2004 02:56 pm
I could call Bradbury and see if he's really pissed. Is this something like Al Franken using "fair and balanced?" The title does not violate any copywright laws.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Jun, 2004 02:12 am
Lightwizard wrote:
I could call Bradbury and see if he's really pissed. Is this something like Al Franken using "fair and balanced?" The title does not violate any copywright laws.

It's not about laws, it's about courtesy. As Bradbury says himself, he isn't going to sue, he just thinks what Moore did was rude. He isn't accusing Moore of being a criminal, he's accusing him of being "a jerk". (His choice of words). Being a jerk is legal, but that's beside the point.

I disagree it's the same thing as Fraken using "fair and balanced", in at least two respects. First, "Fair and balanced" is a descriptive phrase people have been using before Fox News even existed. The template "Fahrenheit X (The temperature at which Y burns)" is an invention of Bradbury's which didn't exist before in the context of films. Using this template doesn't merit paying royalities, but it does merit paying credit.

Second, Franken arguably intended to be rude, or at least unfriendly, to Fox News when he chose the title. By contrast, Moore copied the title in an affirmative way. That's more like him calling his documentary "For a handful of dollars" without giving Sergio Leone (director of "for a fistful of dollars") any credit.

It's not a legal problem, but it is a problem of manners.
0 Replies
 
roverroad
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Jun, 2004 03:07 am
I bet Michael Moore's loving this. It just goes without saying that a film always does better at the box office when it has publicity, good or bad.

And those people call them selves Americans, Haven't they read the 1st amendment?

Personally, I think Moore is a little out there, but I admire his bluntness. He's no worse than Limbaugh who spills his drivel over the airwaves every day. Now Moore is getting flack for a film? Those people are hippocrates because they probably all listen to Limbaugh.

I don't want to see the film, but I may just go buy a few tickets to support it.
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Jun, 2004 04:02 am
thehamster wrote:
Anoxia wrote:
I hate Moore, but I wouldn't ban his latest movie/comedy/"documentary wannabe"... I think his movie is a huge display of his idiocy, and I think more people should see that, HA HA.

Quote:
Anoxia
Enthusiast in Training
Joined: 11 Jun 2004
Posts: 55
Location: Southern US


Gosh I just love you guys from the South Laughing


They're pretty easy to pick.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Jun, 2004 07:04 am
Fahrenheit 45l is a term used long before Bradbury wrote the book. Since he's been a personal friend for more than 40 years, I could find out if this is just more right wing tabloid nonsense.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 4.72 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 08:25:17