Lightwizard wrote:I could call Bradbury and see if he's really pissed. Is this something like Al Franken using "fair and balanced?" The title does not violate any copywright laws.
It's not about laws, it's about courtesy. As Bradbury says himself, he isn't going to sue, he just thinks what Moore did was rude. He isn't accusing Moore of being a criminal, he's accusing him of being "a jerk". (His choice of words). Being a jerk is legal, but that's beside the point.
I disagree it's the same thing as Fraken using "fair and balanced", in at least two respects. First, "Fair and balanced" is a descriptive phrase people have been using before Fox News even existed. The template "Fahrenheit X (The temperature at which Y burns)" is an invention of Bradbury's which didn't exist before in the context of films. Using this template doesn't merit paying royalities, but it does merit paying credit.
Second, Franken arguably
intended to be rude, or at least unfriendly, to Fox News when he chose the title. By contrast, Moore copied the title in an affirmative way. That's more like him calling his documentary "For a handful of dollars" without giving Sergio Leone (director of "for a fistful of dollars") any credit.
It's not a legal problem, but it is a problem of manners.