Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

I'n not understanding what you're trying to say.

You blame feminism as not doing enough to promote women's rights. Then claim with out immigration reform and infrastructure measures in place, feminism will not achieve their goals.

What am I missing here?

I blame every group that demands things because of what they are instead of who they are.

Oh. Does that include the republicans?

That includes everyone who thinks they are special, and have done 0 to earn that status.

In other words, since feminism is about equaliry and you hate equality becasuse you think it's divisive. You think a woman's place is in the home, right? Keep em barefoot and pregnant, right? You don't care if they work too, t5he woman has to have your dinner ready and on the table for you at 6:00 on the dot, right?

Ever heard of condoms.? They've had em for centuries. Used to use sheep's bladders or something like that, before they invented latex.

I do not hate equality, but I bet you can prove I do. Have at it.

https://jayceescommentaries.files.wordpress.com/2018/11/trump-derangement-syndrome.jpg

Just did.

No you didn't. The only way you can prove it is with what I have said. You quoted nothing from my posts.

No. You falsely accused him of hating equality. You did not prove that he hates equality.

He's saying that equal rights won't mean very much if we no longer exist because the country has been destroyed.

If "condoms alone" are not good enough for women, then "condoms alone" are not good enough for men either.

Does it take a high IQ to figure that out? Here I thought anyone could understand what I meant. Shows you how much I know.

Then I suggest we impeach the law breaking president and start over before that happens.

What laws has he broken?

Trump is not destroying the country. He is saving it.

And there is no reason to think that Trump has broken the law. Since these leftist witch hunts have a history of fabricating obstruction charges against innocent people, we can't trust anything that the Mueller report says.

And even if we could somehow trust the Mueller report, the precedent has already been set that obstruction does not warrant removal from office.

Trump says lawyer Emmet Flood leaving in June
June 1, 2019, 7:35 PM EDT
By Reuters

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump announced on Saturday that a member of his legal team, Emmet Flood, will leave his post later this month after helping him handle the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election campaign.

"Emmet Flood, who came to the White House to help me with the Mueller Report, will be leaving service on June 14th. He has done an outstanding job – NO COLLUSION - NO OBSTRUCTION! Case Closed! Emmet is my friend, and I thank him for the GREAT JOB he has done," Trump said on Twitter.

Trump has been restructuring his legal team as he shifts from dealing with Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe to battling Democratic-led investigations in the U.S. Congress.

Mueller concluded that Russia repeatedly interfered in the 2016 election and that Trump's campaign had multiple contacts with Russian officials, but he did not establish that there was a criminal conspiracy with Moscow to win the White House.

Mueller's report declined to make a judgment on whether Trump obstructed justice, although it outlined instances in which Trump tried to have Mueller fired or otherwise impede the investigation.

Now that we know ;
(1) there was no prosecutable criminal act on the part of Trump or his campaign;
(2) the ample evidence of extreme bias on the part of a large cadre of the Mueller investigation team(which has already resulted in the firing of several FBI officials) ;
(3) the likely repeated violations of law attending the various FOIA authorizations for major parts of the investigation; and, finally
(4) the accumulating evidence of a politically motivated conspiracy on the part of officials in the Obama administration to protect Hillary from prosecution and slander Trump during the Presidential campaign and afterwards
- the basis for the President's frustration is both ample and well founded.

Indeed the real obstructions of justice here appear to have come from the Obama Administration officials who conspired to clear Hillary of any charges for rather obvious violations of laws involving classified information - I stark contrast to the methods almost simultaneously being applied to Trump.

Any resistance Trump applied to an increasingly obvious political conspiracy, launched by officials of the preceding administration, is now being termed by their supporters as "obstruction of justice", when his duty as President was, in fact to resist and expose such a conspiracy.

Come on, Trump can't even resist a fourth cheeseburger and you expect me to believe he's exposing a conspiracy?

LOL!