@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:Totally false.
Wrong. If the Framers had allowed the South to count a slave as a whole person in the census, the South would have overwhelming power in the federal government and would never have had to secede. Slavery would continue today.
If the Framers had refused to count slaves in the census, the South would never have joined the Constitution and would have instead formed their own country. Slavery would continue today.
MontereyJack wrote:What made it possible to end slavery was the south's fatal decisiobn to secede.
Without the 3/5 compromise, they never would have seceded. Slavery would continue today.
MontereyJack wrote:Had they not made that decision the 3/5 compromise would have remained in effect, quite possibly until today since it was part of the constitution,
Perhaps. But the 3/5 compromise is the only reason why they did make that decision.
MontereyJack wrote:denying black americans any human rights
The 3/5 compromise did not deny any human rights.
MontereyJack wrote:and giving slave owners undemocratic power in congress.
The 3/5 compromise
prevented slave owners from having undemocratic power in Congress.
Counting slaves as whole people in the census is what would have given slave owners undemocratic power.
MontereyJack wrote:It was in no way responsible for ending slavery.
Wrong. If the Framers had allowed the South to count a slave as a whole person in the census, the South would have overwhelming power in the federal government and would never have had to secede. Slavery would continue today.
If the Framers had refused to count slaves in the census, the South would never have joined the Constitution and would have instead formed their own country. Slavery would continue today.
MontereyJack wrote:sheer sophistry on oralloy's part.
The reality that slavery would continue today if it had not been for the 3/5 compromise is hardly sophistry.