50
   

Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

 
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 12:47 am
@coldjoint,
I ask you, joint,who's the one that has told over 7500 lies and mistruths in office in two years? When Jefferson talked about the corrupt and the filled with lies, he was presciently describing donald trump.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 02:22 am
@MontereyJack,
Considering the fact that the left actively whitewashes Obama's lies, and falsely accuses Trump Administration officials of lying when they aren't, it is highly plausible that Obama is the biggest liar in recent presidential history.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 02:23 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
the undemocratic winner-take-all
Elections are undemocratic?
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 07:55 am
@oralloy,
when it's a national election and each individyal part of it is anti-democratic, yes.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 08:06 am
@MontereyJack,
All the other first world countries divide the vote for their leader into separate winner-take-all districts.

Does this mean there is no such thing as democracy?
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 08:17 am
@oralloy,
And our system has one leader who is elected nationaly.versus parliamentary systems where the leader is elected by the elected representatives rather than nationalyWhen a voter in Wyoming counts four times as much as a voter in California, yes, the EC is clearly antidemocratic and intentionaly so. that's the problem.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 08:32 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
And our system has one leader who is elected nationaly.versus parliamentary systems where the leader is elected by the elected representatives rather than nationaly
Either way, the vote for the leader is broken up into separate winner-take-all districts.

MontereyJack wrote:
When a voter in Wyoming counts four times as much as a voter in California, yes, the EC is clearly antidemocratic and intentionaly so. that's the problem.
I perceive no problem.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 08:39 am
@MontereyJack,
You preach for exactly what the FF didn't want, a tyrany by the larger populations against the smaller states. You don't think WY should have any say at all, while CA and NY run the country. That is as unConstitutional as one can get, you don't support "democracy", you support fascism.

"Keep quiet little states, us big states are running the show".
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 09:08 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:
All the other first world countries divide the vote for their leader into separate winner-take-all districts.
We even don't elect our leader - no matter, if it's the chancellor or the president of Germany - directly.
Same in the UK, although the German and British election law differs significantly - proportional representation here, relative majority (plurality vote) there.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 09:10 am
@Walter Hinteler,
You sound surprised at Oralloy not understanding something. Do you want to explain the Westminster system to him or is life too short?
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 09:33 am
@izzythepush,
Explaining the succession to the British throne would be a bit easier.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 09:34 am
@Walter Hinteler,
And even then success is not guaranteed.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 09:56 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
We even don't elect our leader - no matter, if it's the chancellor or the president of Germany - directly.
Same in the UK,
Exactly as I said. Thank you for once again confirming that I am correct.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 09:57 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
You sound surprised at Oralloy not understanding something. Do you want to explain the Westminster system to him or is life too short?
Unlike you, I do not fail to understand things.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 09:59 am
@oralloy,
Go on then, explain how the Westminster system works.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 10:17 am
@izzythepush,
And cue the deafening silence.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 10:26 am
@izzythepush,
Don't be silly.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 10:27 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
Go on then, explain how the Westminster system works.
You have individual districts that elect people to a legislative body. A party or coalition of parties forms a majority within this legislative body, and their leader becomes the leader of the UK's government.
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 10:33 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:
A party or coalition of parties forms a majority within this legislative body, and their leader becomes the leader of the UK's government.
No.
The party that wins the majority forms its own government and appoints a Prime Minister. That's not necessarily the leader of the party.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Feb, 2019 10:35 am
@oralloy,
You looked that up, but you still can't give any names like constituency or House of Commons.

The easiest, most logical, way to do it would be to compare it to your own Congress. Instead of having direct elections the speaker has executive powers, but when you're cutting and pasting something you only have a tenuous grip of logic doesn't come into it.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.17 seconds on 04/19/2024 at 04:56:31