Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

@coldjoint,

Oh, geez, make up your mind already.

First you claim Snopes isn't a credible news source and now you're relying on it.

Pick a side. And stick with it.

2 Replies

@neptuneblue,

Quote:

First you claim Snopes isn't a credible news source and now you're relying on it.

Did you miss the edit? I said Snopes sucks. I used that to show the truth does not matter to progressives.

1 Reply

https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/5bbaf2b4210000d601c9831b.png?cache=yjsphhlcr5&ops=scalefit_720_noupscale

1 Reply

@edgarblythe,

You could replace the elephant with Muhammad.

0 Replies

@coldjoint,

coldjoint wrote:

I used that to show the truth does not matter to

You.

Yes, we get it.

1 Reply

@neptuneblue,

Quote:

Yes, we get it.

You are about to.

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

No, not at all.

0 Replies

@neptuneblue,

While there is little fraud reported though there are "millions" of cases of Russia tampering with our electorate on behalf of the republican party, because, the repugs know they are losers and the only way they can win is by cheating and deceiving people into voting for them.

Lying to people is a form of voter fraud and the republicans are rife and complicit in that immoral tactic.

If people knew the truth about the republicans they would never vote for them.

0 Replies

@coldjoint,

coldjoint wrote:

Here you go.

Quote:
Trump orders voter fraud commission after lodging charges over the 2016 election that he won

Quote:
President Trump ordered a voter fraud investigation Thursday, thrusting back into the spotlight an issue that few other Republican leaders want to tackle as he tries to divert attention from the controversy over his firing of FBI Director James B. Comey.

You can see how biased the article is but you can also there was or is an investigation. Anything else?
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-voter-fraud-20170511-story.html

That's not proof. He never brought the evidence to the table, and hence, he hasn't proven a thing. Trump has a large pool of unsubstantiated claims to his name, and this is just one of many.

If an investigation has been conducted, and proof has been found of voter fraud to the amount of 3 million votes, who apparently also ALL VOTED FOR HILLARY, then I expected at the very least a court case against these people, or the deportation of these 3 million people. After all, voter fraud is a very serious affair, and it directly undermines the foundation of a democracy. So a president, especially one who was penalized by this voter fraud, should do everything he could to put an end to it, no? However, nothing happened. At all. He hasn't brought ANY names to the table either. Certainly, if these are illegal votes cast by illegal aliens, then democracy would only be served by publicizing their names along with the evidence of their fraud.

And yet, you insist that he has proven it. It shows blind faith and absolute loyalty, not unlike the love a dog has for its owner. Kudos to you, coldie.

PS: This proof thing, does that work for everything the man said? I mean, Trump has also claimed that climate change is a hoax, in so many words. This is a tweet from Trump: 'The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.' So is that now 'proven' as well?

1 Reply

@najmelliw,

Quote:

, Trump has also claimed that climate change is a hoax, in so many words.

Quote:

Over 30,000 scientists say 'Catastrophic Man-Made Global Warming' is a complete hoax and science lie

https://www.naturalnews.com/055151_global_warming_science_hoax_climate_skepticism.html
Right again. Climate change is to tax carbon emissions, it is more about money than anything else and redistribution of that money.

Quote:

And yet, you insist that he has proven it.

I never said it was proven I said I believed it happened.

1 Reply

Quote:

FAKE blue wave! Leaked audio of lib organizer telling bused-in activists to HIDE where they’re from is SO 2018 Dems

Pitiful, everything is a lie with Democrats. Think the MSM will report this?

Quote:

Sorry Democrats, if you have to bus people in for protests in order to pretend you have momentum heading into the midterms that whole blue wave thing is probably NOT going to happen. We’ve known the Left has been doing this for years (Scott Walker protesters anyone?), but to hear it through leaked audio … it’s still honestly a little shocking.

https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2018/10/09/fake-blue-wave-leaked-audio-of-lib-organizer-telling-bused-in-activists-to-hide-where-theyre-from-is-so-2018-dems/

0 Replies

@coldjoint,

coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
, Trump has also claimed that climate change is a hoax, in so many words.

Quote:

Over 30,000 scientists say 'Catastrophic Man-Made Global Warming' is a complete hoax and science lie

https://www.naturalnews.com/055151_global_warming_science_hoax_climate_skepticism.html
Right again. Climate change is to tax carbon emissions, it is more about money than anything else and redistribution of that money.

Quote:
And yet, you insist that he has proven it.

I never said it was proven I said I believed it happened.

Oh, yes. A petition signed by over 30.000 scientists. Organized by Art Robinson, who is coincidentally also involved with the Oregon Petition. Read the wiki page on it (you can find it here). And now this petition. It has started in 1998 I believe, and it is now 2016. So in the span of 18 years(it came into the spotlight in 2016, so let's focus on that year) It got a grand total of 31,000 signatures by that time. However, the wording is debatable, especially in the second paragraph:

'There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.'

I'd ask you to find it for yourself, but let's not go there. It's basically in the wording of the first sentence: '...is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause ...'. Since that type of phrasing is used for a certainty, as in, a '100% of the time true' situation, it leaves no room for reasonable doubt. That will allow scientists to sign it with a clear conscience, I suppose. It would also be interesting to know if all of the scientists who signed it have actually studied in a relevant field pertaining to the petition at hand. For instance, I doubt a psychologist or a philosopher or a dental surgeon have any knowledge regarding this subject, but they could easily have signed it.

I have very serious doubts about the quality and authenticity of this petition.

2 Replies

@najmelliw,

Quote:

I have very serious doubts about the quality and authenticity of this petition.

How about the taxing of carbon emissions? That is a scam that this science was meant to promote. The Earth is very old, and we just do not know as much as we think about weather cycles. See if the data is accurate in a billion years, that is what they are asking you to believe, knowing full well that it cannot be proven either way. SCAM.

1 Reply