45
   

Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

Forums: Politics, Conservatives, Republicans, Ballot Box Justice, U S Election
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 12:09 pm
@Region Philbis,
What is the big deal? The Left listens to losers like the Hollywood crowd. The hypocrisy is precious.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 12:10 pm
@TheCobbler,
Quote:
I think they should call themselves the "wackadoodle party"

I think the Democrats are using that name. Try again.
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 12:21 pm
NASA program to track greenhouse gas is canceled
https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/34387314_392133657862988_4703134513633427456_o.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=b7df887c3e8c24f56b11135b46c51937&oe=5B774662
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 12:23 pm
@TheCobbler,
Quote:
greenhouse gas

Do they still want Muslims in space? Obama's idea.
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 12:48 pm
https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/33923752_10101350025407148_8412264791535517696_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=0881f56a8db8e168b67f3b1e894d1fb8&oe=5BC157A9
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 01:23 pm
@TheCobbler,
Quote:
YouTube Star Who Drinks Cereal From a Bathtub to Interview President Obama

Look who is talking. Laughing Laughing Laughing
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/youtube-star-drinks-cereal-bathtub-interview-obama-today/story?id=28398889
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 01:38 pm



Quote:
Why Communism Always Devolves Into Heavy-Handed Authoritarianism


Every time one points out a historic failure of communism (most recently, for example, in Venezuela), Marxists will argue "well, that is not true communism." Somehow they think that communism without heavy-handed exercise of state power is possible. It is not.

Here is the latest example, from our own peoples' republic in California. For reasons that are simply beyond me, no one in California wants to use market mechanisms and the power of prices to match supply and demand for water. We use these market tools successfully in pretty much every other market, but not in water. The result is that increasingly heavy-handed exercise of government power is necessary to match supply and demand.

Vote Democratic and submit to the state, comrades.
http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blog/2018/06/why-communism-always-devolves-into-heavy-handed-authoritarianism.html
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 01:42 pm
@TheCobbler,
Does it mean Trump will shorten his prison sentence for obstruction of justice?
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 01:45 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
will shorten his prison sentence

The "his" is Obama, and the answer is no.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 01:59 pm
Some have claimed that Trump cannot break the law, because he's the president. CLUE: Nobody is above the law. There are legal boundaries for everybody including the president.

Richard I. Polis, Entrepreneur/Consultant
Answered Sep 27, 2014
"Who decides that breaking the law is necessary to save the nation? Remember that the nation is not the same as the government, to say nothing of the careers of the incumbents. Marbury vs. Madison established that the President is not above the law.

That said, a powerful President has been known to get away with breaking the law. Think of Roosevelt's internment of ethnic Japanese U.S. citizens purely because of their ethnicity. Think of the several thousand people jailed by Lincoln (who suspended habeas corpus) because they opposed the war."

My note on Roosevelt's internment of Japanese Americans. My family and I were sent to Tule Lake Concentration Camp during WWII without being charged with any crime. Some decades after the war, the government paid reparations to us with an apology. I don't think any other country has ever apologized for their past mistakes similar to the United States, and paid reparations to its victims. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Liberties_Act_of_1988

Some congressional members are suggesting impeachment if Trump was to fire Mueller. I don't think Trump is going to test that option. http://thehill.com/homenews/house/338244-dem-lawmaker-congress-would-begin-impeachment-if-trump-fired-mueller
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 02:44 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Nobody is above the law.

Then why is Killary still free? When anyone answers that we can talk about Trump.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 05:07 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
Does it mean Trump will shorten his prison sentence for obstruction of justice?
Trump has not committed obstruction of justice.

But the fact that the Democrats said it was OK for Bill Clinton to obstruct justice means that Trump would be off the hook if he had done so.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 05:08 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
Some have claimed that Trump cannot break the law, because he's the president.
No they haven't. What they have claimed is that it is not obstruction of justice when the government decides to wind down an investigation.

And they are correct.

cicerone imposter wrote:
Some decades after the war, the government paid reparations to us with an apology.
That token payment is hardly enough to count as reparations. Reparations would be a million dollars for every year that someone spent in internment.

cicerone imposter wrote:
Some congressional members are suggesting impeachment if Trump was to fire Mueller.
These congressional members are goofy and ignorant. It is hardly an impeachable offense for the president to exercise his normal constitutional powers.

That said, if Trump were to fire Mueller, it would inspire Congress to try to pass legislation reinstating Mueller, and this legislation would be attached to something that Trump would rather not veto. That is a headache that Trump would be better off avoiding.

What Trump should do is simply pardon everyone who is threatened by this witch hunt.
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 05:25 pm
A fierce opponent of the Endangered Species Act is picked to oversee Interior’s wildlife policy
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2018/04/04/a-fierce-opponent-of-the-endangered-species-act-is-picked-to-oversee-interiors-wildlife-policy

Miss Piggy would have been a better pick...
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 05:28 pm
@TheCobbler,
Get used to it. We're going to see more of these unqualified yo-yo's to head the important departments of the federal government. We can't get rid of Trump soon enough.
Baldimo
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 05:29 pm
@cicerone imposter,
unqualified means they don't agree with your views on things? The Obama admin put in the most extreme people into those positions. If they were for anti-growth and crippling regulations on US business, they were qualified...
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  3  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 06:07 pm

https://i.imgur.com/5cyB0kd.jpg
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 06:28 pm
@Region Philbis,
Obama was not weak, he was, and is a traitor.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 07:33 pm
@Region Philbis,
Trump's lies during his first 200 days.
https://www.vogue.com/article/donald-trump-lies-200-days

Trump can't even tell the truth about the crowd size at his inauguration. Pretty sad, because that's not that important. He doesn't understand that the important issues are what affects our country and the people, and he's done a pretty bad job of that! His approval rating proves it.
oralloy
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 4 Jun, 2018 07:56 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
Trump can't even tell the truth about the crowd size at his inauguration.
Neither can the media. They keep showing pictures from earlier in the morning when people were still filing in.

cicerone imposter wrote:
He doesn't understand that the important issues are what affects our country and the people, and he's done a pretty bad job of that!
On the contrary, he is doing an outstanding job of preventing liberals from violating the Second Amendment, and that is exactly what we need in a president.

cicerone imposter wrote:
His approval rating proves it.
http://images.axios.com/jm5IaDdLzBhmUBiBJ3EhWw1E_x0=/2018/06/03/1528030074530.jpg
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans
  3. » Page 513
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.14 seconds on 04/10/2025 at 09:42:18
▲ ▼