Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

Show me ANYTHING that shows I was "dissing" on Hillary. I'll wait.

Clicked on the post you quoted and I didn't see this at all, Baldimo.

Snood did no such thing, if anything he was attacking Trump supporters. You went off on one, which you're still doing btw, because you've got your head so far stuck up your arse that you imaging slights where there are none. And it is really ******* stupid so stop doing it.

What's far worse is the way you scolded Snood, telling him off for the terrible way black districts didn't go as pro Clinton as you'd expected. What about your ******* demographic, white American men? You're the ones who put Trump in office. Why don't you think about that before you spout your wrong end of the stick bollocks at anyone else.

You owe Snood an apology, but you can stay mad at me if you want.

He didn't say that at all, you doofus. He pointed out that gerrymandering has caused inequalities in the voting process.

Cobbler: "Says lot about your own uninformed state of mind considering it is mostly blacks who lose district votes due to gerrymandering."

Okay Snood... you chose to "quote" the words of Stein/Bernie(Russian) propagandists versus those of Hillary supporters.

Enough?
You should also "quote" Ben Carson... (cynical)

Rexred is red not black or white

You know why you can't show me a specific post where I did that? Because you're making it up. If you had any integrity at all you'd just admit you were mistaken. I agree with Iggy that you should apologize for all that nasty stuff about douching you barfed up, but I'd settle for a simple admission you were wrong.

I never realised this had caught the attention of rock stars.



Iggy Pop is so good.

Btw, I don't think Cobbler will admit to being wrong because that will also mean having to admit he's been stupid.

"Iggy", the ever stunning hypocrite!

You know the old saying, where there's smoke there's fire?

Leaked docs show new depth of US voting system hacking by Russia
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/leaked-docs-show-new-depth-of-us-voting-system-hacking-by-russia-960893507774?cid=eml_mra_20170606

Now the person who copied this information and gave it to the public, do they not deserve a commendation for this effort?

They have informed the public of an issue that we have the right to know.

And I would like to know who exactly it was that took it upon themselves to withhold this information of Russians hacking into our voter database from the public? They are the ones who need to be behind bars...

Since when did hacking into our presidential election become a "need to know" basis?!!!

We have every right to know every single last detail of any hacking into our election!

Why trust our voting system's integrity if we are not even privy to breaches into it???

Should we have to wait till this information is "leaked"???

Once again "who" is impeding this information and withholding it from the public and are we not constitutionally guaranteed that this information not ever be withheld?

Snood I came to A2k to with the sole purpose of posting the douching meme and before I could post it I noticed your comment parroting the Russian propaganda against Hillary and her, uhhh, "poorly run campaign"...

So rather than wait till a2k would allow me to post the meme after a response to you I just added it to the same post.

It was your conscience I guess that amalgamated the two.

The meme was obviously unrelated and one would really have to do mental calisthenics to equate the two.

For this though, I am genuinely sorry... The meme is totally unrelated it was meant to be a side joke to lighten up things. On the other hand, calling your comment wishy washy and unfocused I stand by my assertion.

If you support Hillary than quote your own feelings and not those who have malicious and corrupt intent... Or was this a straw man meant to inflame me?

If find this to be a pattern in a number of your posts, and I finally worked up the gumption to a call you out on it. If you were to ever find my own appeasement tiresome I would expect you to do the same no matter how abrasive it may seem.

I am sorry I lumped the Trump meme into your post but had I just posted it might have been taken the same way regardless.

This is why I said a few words about your post before posting the meme but it did not work as I intended and again I am sorry for the misunderstanding.

I certainly don't think of you as Putin's prostitute...

Izzy was quick to jab the knife too rather than defend Hillary.

Since I am "barfing up" memes against Trump nice to see you coming to defend him Snood while throwing me under the bus...

Just so you can stand by your shitty remarks concerning Hillary.

How about an apology from you now Snood for your barfing comment about Hillary's "poorly run campaign"?

Show me the post that I quoted Russians or show me the post where I made shitty remarks about Hillary or admit you're a liar who doesn't know what the hell youre talking about.

Let's dissect Hillary's "poorly run campaign"... Shall we?

Hillary 50% of the time stuck to the issues, compared to 10% with Trump the rest of the time was Trump's empty and vague promises and race bating.

The other 50% of the time Hillary quoted Trump's outrageous statements and devious "plans".

Hillary did not create a huge propaganda machine spreading lies about Trump because Trump's statements were so despicably true she had sounds bytes to prove each and every sick statement.

Then there was the issue of Hillary not giving Bernie the DNC's member list.

Well, considering the Russians had infiltrated "the burn's" campaign to such an extreme degree... handing over this list was equal to giving this list directly to the Russians. So the Russians got it anyway, because when they finally hacked the DNC they would certainly have also obtained the elite lists of democratic donors. Does it make you comfortable knowing the Russians have your private info?

While the FBI's failure, because they were too busy to intercept Russian hackers, they had been led by the GOP down a dead end road discussing what Hillary chatted to friends about what she ate for dinner, the Russians were using private information to launch a giant smear campaign of LIES (yes I capitalized that word for a reason).

The Russians paid Facebook, Twitter, and all of our major and minor national news outlets (because they are all owned by a few people) to spread
these LIES.. they graciously accepted the money and LIES with open arms.

While the FBI read emails about Hillary's day to day events.

...and Hillary is in the pocket of Goldman Sacks remember????

They targeted these LIES based upon democratic surveys stolen from the DNC.

This fake news "state sponsored" chatter became so deafening that even Trumps own racist words paled to the rumors that Hillary had "10 people murdered" and her numerous lesbian affairs and she is dying from several diseases. ON AND ON AND ON.... We were bombarded with Russians posing as Bernie supporters and skewing online polls with deceptive and misleading "Bernie bots"...

And
Benghazi,
Benghazi,
Benghazi,
Benghazi,
Benghazi,
Benghazi,
Benghazi,
Benghazi,
Benghazi,
Benghazi,

Since when is a US political campaign supposed to be fought against a state sponsored interest? Even Jeb Bush could not stand against Russian interests.

So next time Democrats should enlist half of Europe to hack into the GOP spread fake news and pay Facebook, Twitter and every news agency to spread LIES for $. And then we can be commended for "running a great campaign"!!!

To hell with a cohesive plan or having a command about the issues.

Corruption = a greatly run campaign...

...after all of this Russian corruption, gerrymandering, votes coming from nowhere in Wisconsin, tampering with voter registrations, the Kochs own many voting machines... last minute moved voting stations, no longer weekend voting, huge lines at the polls, new voter ID cards... and the FBI only knows WHAT ELSE??? So let's repeat this that "Hillary poorly ran her campaign" and see if it sticks...

While Hillary still won the popular vote. I firmly believe Hillary won the election, and she won it on good merits, not corruption, cheating and bold faced headline LIES...

Instead of loudly defending Hillary's campaign tactics Snood wrote this:

Their stock answer these days is, "Not our fault! Hillary ran a crappy campaign!"

Comment: Yes Snood, you decided to quote the Bernie people (Russian propagandists) rather than defend Hillary.

Apparently you do not know who "they" "their" "our" are.

Let me enlighten you...

I don't know if you're being intentionally obtuse, or if you're really this dense. I don't really care. The paltry information or minimal satisfaction I get from my exchanges with you isn't worth the work it takes. But the TRUTH of the matter is that I was ridiculing the Bernie followers, as I did throughout the campaign. I was making the point that they would NEVER accept their part of the accountability for allowing the orange POS to get the presidency. That's all I was saying by quoting them. It meant NOTHING derogatory toward Hillary, and I have been one of her staunchest supporters throughout. I even started a whole thread just to speak positively of her, because there was so much sniping. So I don't know WHAT ridiculous reasons you have for claiming I've said or done anything anti -Hillary, because that is just a lie. If you can't admit you are wrong about that, I can't see any reason to continue trying to communicate with you at all.

That is flagrantly undemocratic.

Since you find it more important to repeat Russian propaganda against Hillary rather than stand up for Hillary... something is twisted here and the private messages I have received thanking me for standing up for Hillary are vindication.

If all you have to add to the conversation is regurgitated Russian propaganda, well...

This conversation has gone over the same circle several revolutions to move onto something more productive like "raising Hillary up" would be refreshing.

Snood I do not find your quoting of Russian propaganda that serious but I see you are beyond reproach if someone finds your post disagreeable you show not one single degree of consideration.

Just denial.

If this was a test well, you seemingly failed.

If I spent all day quoting what "they" think, well "they" would not need to pay people to spread their lies anymore when they could just use me for free...

Trump just tweeted this, "blah blah blah..." Trump just tweeted that, "la la la la"...

It is a matter of focusing on those who do good. Like mayors from cities all over the country who are currently signing agreements to bypass the White House and follow the Paris accord anyway. THIS is worthy of repeating.

Not what "they" the GOP jerks think and say.

"They" are depending on you to spread there hate. You seem ready and willing to do so...

I think you're about as cracked as Camlock. Welcome to my (very overdue but held off to try to give the benefit of a doubt) ignore.

Whoa, Snood pulls out the ignore card. Such a brave soul this "man".