Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

Is this admitting that they haven't been doing their jobs? The American people for the most part know the media hasn't been doing their jobs. It's funny to hear her call it "neutral" when they have never been "neutral", they have always called things with a bias toward the left side of the isle.

LEFT side of the aisle? That's just hilarious. Trump says he wants to abandon the US policy of containing Russian expansionism and substitute a policy of the US and Russia dealing only with "mutual shared interests"-no mention of freedom for newly free Eastern European countries-and the media barely pays attention. Social media is swamped with paid Russian trolls extolling the virtues of Trump, and the media pays no attention. Trump hires people who worked for Russia on his campaign, including two campaign managers besides others, and the media goes ho hum.

But the media is like attack dogs on Email servers. And the media waits until AFTER the election to really push the fact that Russia is pushing hard to elect an American president who has said he will change American foreign policy to match up with Russia's. And you say the media leans left.

How many times are you going to try to twist what Obama said in the debate with Romney? In that debate, this is what Obama said, in a discussion about the threat of al-Qaeda: "Governor Romney, I'm glad that you recognize that al-Qaeda is a threat, because a few months ago when you were asked what was the biggest geopolitical threat facing America you said Russia. Not al-Qaeda, you said Russia. And the 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back" .

At the time, Russia had been contained within its borders, and al-Qaeda had blown up the World Trade Center and was actively planning and carrying out terrorist plots against the US and other Western countries. Tell me, what would your answer be to that question back in 2012?

But notice, during his presidency, Obama fully supported NATO

promised and delivered to Romania and Poland anti-missile devices

On November 8, an aide to U.S. President-Elect Barack Obama denied a claim made by Polish President Lech Kaczyński's office, that a pledge had been made to go ahead with the missile defense system during a phone conversation between the two men. "His [Obama's] position is as it was throughout the campaign, that he supports deploying a missile defence system when the technology is proved to be workable," the aide said, but "no commitment" has been made.[23]

On November 14, French President Nicolas Sarkozy stated that plans for a U.S. missile shield in Central Europe were misguided, and wouldn't make the continent a safer place. "Deployment of a missile defense system would bring nothing to security ... it would complicate things, and would make them move backward," he said at a summit. He also warned Russian President Medvedev against upping tensions by deploying missiles in Kaliningrad in response to the planned U.S. missile defense system.[24]

On April 5, 2009, President Obama, during a speech in Prague, declared: "As long as the threat from Iran persists, we will go forward with a missile defense system that is cost-effective and proven." [25] President Obama continued to express conditional support for the program and sought to isolate it from U.S.-Russian nuclear arms control talks.[26]

On September 17, 2009, The White House issued a statement saying that the US "no longer planned to move forward" with the project. According to President Obama, new intelligence had shown Iran was pursuing short-range and medium-range missile development, rather than long-range, necessitating a shift in strategy.[27][28] The outlines of a reformulated, scaled-down project began to emerge in October, 2009.[6]

After the project cancellation, Vice President Joe Biden visited Poland in 2009 to "mend relations" by announcing the SM-3 deployment plan (see below for details of the new plan). Polish sources complained that the new plan no longer gave Poland an exclusive role (because an SM-3 site was also planned for Romania).[29]

In 2010 cables leaked by Wikileaks showed that Polish diplomats felt more threatened by Russia than by Iran.[30] The (leaked) responses from the Pentagon show that Alexander Vershbow sought to assure that the missile shield, including the SM-3 alternative, was adaptable to "hypothetical" threats.[31]

On March 26, 2012, there occurred a microphone gaffe between President Obama and President Medvedev. Obama said that he would have "more flexibility" to deal with controversial issues such as missile defense. He was heard telling Medvedev, "On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved but it's important for him to give me space." Medvedev told the president in English, "Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…" and President Obama continued his statement, "This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility." Medvedev responded saying, again in English, "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir."[32]

In March 2013, Polish Deputy Minister of Defense Robert Kupiecki announced that Poland intended to build its own missile defense within NATO, complementing the US deployment. Poland's tentative budget for the next decade is "$10 billion for the modernization of air defense, where half of this sum is dedicated to lower-tier missile defense."[33]

and OKed such programs as the F-35, the most expensive weapon in history.

Clearly, Obama understood the need to continue to contain Russia.

The 300,000 figure originated with a court's estimate of how many voters were potentially impacted by a voter ID law as it stood in April 2014, but by October 2016, changes had been made to that law. Moreover, even if the 300,000 figure was an accurate estimate of Wisconsin residents who back in 2014 possibly could not vote because they did not have the correct identification, that number was not a head count of residents who actually did (or would have) set out to vote on 8 November 2016 only to be turned away.