cicerone imposter wrote:
There should be a law against any party that says "no" to everything.
As much as I want to agree with that, Dems have their own history of hating who is in power too, and obstructing. Not as fanactically as todays GOP is doing, but I am no presidential historian.
But I disagree in any law that illegalizes free speech. You know better CI.
How would that work anyway? You cant disagree with the president. That sounds alot like a dictatorship. Right?