Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

Ah-hahahahahahahahahaha . . .

Well, maybe he meant Israel.........but that wouldn't exactly make sense either. I have to be more disciplined about avoiding anything written by oral, it only serves to make me bang my head on the desk.

I think General Bradley Purpose is breathing down Oralloy’s neck right now. He’s what they call a two in one.

hahahahahahahahahahahaha

Yes it is.



I rely on facts instead of bluster. That's why you couldn't point out any errors in my posts.

I note your own reliance on bluster however, and your own failure to understand pretty much everything.



Wrong again.



What non-smart people "know" about being smart is not terribly relevant to smart people.



Yes I do.



I always do that.



Wrong again. Note your inability to point out any errors in my posts.



No I didn't.



Smart people can recognize when other people have nothing to teach.



You've never ever seen me make a mistake.



Notice your inability to point out any untrue statements in my posts?

Rhetorical question. You've already made it clear that you cannot recognize this reality.

Does the difference between a broad mission and a narrow mission really confuse you that much?

Does the difference between a broad mission and a narrow mission confuse you as well?

My posts are not meant for someone with a reading level as low as yours. It is best that you skip them.

I'm not sure who that is, but I'm not feeling any sort of pressure or anything breathing down my neck.

Max Blumenthal, who founded The Grayzone in 2015, also slashed Trump's government for trying to shift the blame in his latest article, arguing that several liberal and conservative American journalists might have played the critical roles in carrying water for Trump's repeated accusations against China from inception.

Max Blumenthal, who appears to have been a trenchant critic of the Republican Party, also implies in his article that some American journalists simply make a virtue of rising anti-China sentiment to seek fame, say, Josh Rogin, a journalist who writes for the Washington Post, which is an anti-Trump newspaper. The Post's owner, Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon, has had contretemps with Trump.

For all his jeremiads about Trump's dilatory response to Covid-19, Max Blumenthal's allusion that liberal publications also help Trump disseminate rumors about the origins of Covid-19 doesn't jibe with the fact that scores of liberal journalists have come out speaking out against Trump's craven efforts to pin blame on China. And there is no reason to think that the Post wants to play such obnoxious conspiracy theories up as an acerbic critic of Trump's policies.

Therefore, Chinese websites don't need to use Max Blumenthal's accusation against Trump as damming evidence to make a case that even Americans think Trump is lying. Make no mistake, Trump is a liar or blamer. Yet Max Blumenthal or his website The Grayzone's criticism of Trump simply cuts no ice with American voters, since The Grayzone is still a "two-bit" website- by which I mean most Americans hardly pay attention to such websites. Plus, unlike ProPublica, which has hired some revered journalists, The Grayzone's authors seem to be all little-known ones.

Max Blumenthal may also have made a big mistake by expostulating with liberal publications instead of the conservative publications supportive of Trump. Doing this would only sow division within the anti-Trump camp and give fodder to Fox News in its quest to besmirch the reputation of the anti-Trump camp. Chinese websites had better not to use The Grayzone as a weapon to fight against Trump for this reason.

Actually, some Chinese websites have already done this; Max Blumenthal was interviewed by some Chinese reporters days ago and his articles have been translated into Chinese. Personally, I don't think it was a prudent move considering that Max Blumenthal is just a bit player, although he claims to have written a best-selling book. And don't forget that he is an anti-Semite and once appeared on Fox News to chide the Democrats.

He can not be trusted as another attention-seeker

If you wrote that go back and put some links in it. I cannot believe much, if any, of what you say.

If not source it.

Well,,,,,,you know that Trump is the pied piper of the unworthy, the low achievers, the poorly educated and is also the perfect opportunity for all the rich opportunists eager to enslave the low achievers, the poorly educated, the resentful and poorly equipped to improve the condition of their fellow Man...some folks think they will be co-rulers with Trump, their Savior.....kinda sad ain't it.

If Trump was a member of the Roman Catholic Church (or really a member of any church, temple or mosque) he might be considered for beatification and eventually be canonized as Saint Donnie the patron Saint of the corrupt. Works for me....

Then why don't you write a searing article to rebut Max Blumenthal's claim that Trump is to blame for trying to beguile Americans into believing the virus was originally produced by some Chinese scientists living in Wuhan.

Show us what you've got if you think you are another alpha male. We are looking forward to seeing your name on the website of Fox News.

You bet. Actually, that's what happening worldwide. The haves and vested interests have no mercy on the poor. Worst of all, sometimes even some plebs begrudge high earners while cocking a snook at people who are poorer than them. That's despicable.

It is nice to have something to live for.

You will have become a guest on Fox News by the time Tucker Carlson proclaims on Fox News that Trump took his first kiss, huh?

What do you live for? For Trump? For the illusion of creating a new world in which gun-toting right-wingers showboat their machismo by gunning cockroaches down. Huh?

There's a patron saint for almost everybody, but as far as I know none for con men, shysters, fraudsters, incompetents, liars and adulterers. Saint Donnie would fill that gap admirably.