Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

@MontereyJack,

that's called proof of concept. Overseas absentee voters have had the option of getting a ballot via the net, and returning it via the net. It works, and it's been done for several elections now. If you can do it for overseas voters, you can do it for voters in the states, if you have the appropriate law/regulation

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

And when you find out ten years from now that Putin has been deciding the results of all your elections, what then?

Michigan doesn't need to have the KGB imposing gay rights legislation on us with these bogus "internet signatures".

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Yeah, that's clearly why we got trump as pres. and here you've been callling it a witch hunt for years.

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

If we have Mr. Trump as our president because of internet voting, it certainly isn't Michigan's fault.

I do not call Mr. Trump's presidency a witch hunt. He is doing a wonderful job of preserving our civil liberties.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

If trump is booted out of office via internet voting, or in person voting, or some combination, justice will have been served

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

It won't be justice if the election is decided by fraudulent votes.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Consdiering the trump admin cut attempts to promote cybersecurity for the election, and considering Putin and Trump are buddies and putin helped trumpl in 2016, if there are fraudulent votes, and Russia has had four more years to find our vulnearbilities, if there is fraudulent voting it's gonna be for trump, and that's just what you want, isn'tit

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

No amount of cybersecurity can ever make internet voting safe.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Your opinion only.

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

Don't come and blame me when you learn that Putin has been deciding who you vote for.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

He did it in 2016 and trump loved it.

1 Reply

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/05/the-senate-map-is-beginning-to-look-pale-blue.html

1 Reply

@ehBeth,

Not pale blue by my reckoning, although the Democrats are doing better than they had been previously.

0 Replies

@MontereyJack,

MontereyJack wrote:

He did it in 2016 and trump loved it.

Putin may have decided who you voted for in 2016, but he certainly wasn't allowed to decide how anyone in Michigan voted.

And hopefully the courts will not allow Putin to impose gay rights legislation on Michigan either.

0 Replies

@Setanta,

There was no bill passed, what he did was the equivalent of an executive order. There was no debate and there was no bill passed, looks like you are lying and don't know what you are talking about.

1 Reply

@Baldimo,

That are regulations approved by an order-in-council from cabinet.

Full text at Canada Gazette

Order in Council is a type of legislation in many countries, not at all the equivalent of an executive order.

2 Replies

@Walter Hinteler,

Walter Hinteler wrote:

Order in Council is a type of legislation in many countries, not at all the equivalent of an executive order.

To clarify: neither the US Constitution nor US federal laws contain provisions on executive orders. They are therefore an element of informal legal practice.

An Order in Council in Commonwealth realms (here: Canada) is - as legislation (sic!) - formally made in the name of the monarch - here: the
Governor General in Council ("royal prerogative") - on recommendation of the Minister of Justice.

0 Replies

@Walter Hinteler,

Order in council says these guns can't be used for hunting, Trudeau agrees and now they are illegal… I'm wondering where the debate and legislation is that was passed by the sitting Parliament?

1 Reply

@Baldimo,

Baldimo wrote:

I'm wondering where the debate and legislation is that was passed by the sitting Parliament?

Can you give a link where in history, in any Commonwealth coutry and the United Kingdom, ever an Order in Council was done with a deabte and passed by a sitting Parliament? I mean, if such had happened, why an Order in Council?
The Royal Prerogative certainly might be questioned, but whatever you think about it: they only can be abolished by Parliament (and the courts) afterwards.

0 Replies

@hingehead,

Wry, ironic humor . . . you wanted to make sure the conservatives/Tories didn't get it, right?

0 Replies

Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know