@vikorr,
I can only presume you find it too painful to admit to your own know-it-all attitude, and that you get some things wrong.
Ionus says 'I know you so much better than you do!'
Vikorr says 'uh, no you don't'
Ionus says 'Don't argue with me, I do'
Vikorr says 'What basis do you have for thinking that'
Ionus says 'I have a single word you said!'
...............................................................................
Vikorr says 'Uh, that word is accurate, and in 100 posts, thats all you've got?'
Ionus "What??? You can't explain it that way - it's obviously dodgy because you explained it AFTER I challenged you on it'
Vikorr 'uh yeah, isn't it normal to explain something after it's challenged?
---------------------------------------------------
'Ionus says'No no, you must be hateful...let me think...you MUST be hateful because you are posting links to current examples of violence in the name of Islam'
Vik says 'err yes...as I've previously said, people ignore the overall pattern: the combined breadth, frequency and severity'
Ionus says 'dude they know about single events, so you must be a hater'
Vikorr says 'uh yeah they do...did you hear what I said about ignoring the overall pattern of breadth/frequency/severity?
Ionus says 'Dude posting links of evidence to violence in the name of Islam is hateful, no matter how true
Vik says 'Err no, it is simply documenting real life events
Ionus 'whatdoisay, whadoIsay to that??
--------------------------------------
Ionus says 'Dude, documenting real life events is akin to nazi tactics !
Vik says 'I've also been asked to justify my position numerous times. How do I justify it without evidence?'
Ionus says 'Ugh, can't argue with that....OH! You're a self appointed crusaders. No one asked you to do such
Vik says 'Are you nuts...once again, this is a forum where people should back up their position...and others did ask me to justify my position'
---------------------------------------------------
Ionus says 'Drat, lost out on that, whatdoIsay, whadoIsay...'
Ionus says ' Dude I base my claim that you hate on the fact that you haven't conceded a single point to the other side'
Viks says 'here's multiple links where I've conceded valid points of the other side'
Ionus 'Oh dear, I'd better not raise that again...oh wait...I know !'.
Ionus says 'You haven't said a single thing moderate'
Vikorr says 'Here's links to where I've said moderate things, and moderated others more extreme claims'
Ionus says 'whatdoIsay, whatdoIsay...oh I know
------------------------------------------------------
Ionus says 'Dude your opinion ISN"T moderate
Vikorr says 'It's accurate to best of my knowledge
Ionus says 'Hah accuracy / smaccuracy, that doesn't matter'
Is that about the gist of how this conversation is going?