nimh wrote:Basically, Bush vs Kerry is a tie, right now
Right now, that's about right, as I see it, too, given examination of just the near-term results ... pretty much "Too Close To Call". I don't see this, as yet, anyway, a "serious development" from my point of view, which of course is that the primary cause is to exclude any of the current crop of Democrat candidate wannabees from The Whitehouse. Naturally, we shall see what developments develop, as always. For the moment, I suspect the apparent increase of public sentiment favorable to The Opposition as opposed to The Current Administration is a function of the current media focus on The Democrats and their champions. As I mentioned, folks in general are influenced by what's in their faces at the moment. What's in their faces is, and for over a year has been, is The Opposition. The Current Administration essentially has been biding its time while the field sorts itself out, a reasonable strategy, IMO. I fully anticipate the Republican counteroffensive, when it begins in earnest, will carry the issue handily. There certainly are deep divisions, and strong partisanship, when the two major parties are considered, and nothing is likely to sway the positions and sentiments of either. Given that the two parties themselves each comprise approximately a third of The Electorate, it is the the other third, the Undecideds, the Independents, who are the key to victory. What I see the Democrats accomplishing is nothing less than alienating this remaining third, which group has yet to be exposed to a vigorous presentation of The Republican Message. Of the remaining viable nominee wannabees, Edwards seems to me capable of mounting the strongest challenge, if only by virtue of his lack of history to mine for negatives. Dean is toast, and Kerry carries a lot of delicious (from the Republican point of view) baggage. I doubt Dean will achieve a respectable third place finish in Wisconsin.
RealClearPolitics shows Kerry with a commanding lead, while Edwards, Dean, and, now inconsequentially Clark, essentially tied for second, splitting roughly a third of the respondents to Kerry's tally of over half those sampled. Clark's withdrawal does cloud things a bit, and it remains to be seen how his former supporters will line up. Should he endorse Kerry, a not unlikely prospect given their military ties, no benefit whatsoever will fall to either Dean or Edwards. As of now, I see an eventual Kerry-Edwards ticket shaping up, and I just don't see that ticket capable of mounting a substantive challenge to The Current Administration. The Dean Debacle foreshadows the performance I expect of The Democratic Party come November. Like the Deaniacs, The Democrats will convince few but themselves of their relevance and substance, IMO, and will be found sadly wanting in the final tally, even without a Third Party distraction, something yet a fair possibility, though by no means a certainty. Should Nader run, or should Dean megomaniacally bolt the party and run as an Independent, it well could be generations before The Democrats recover. Should they avoid a three-way November contest, they have the possibility of gaining some influence in the '06 midterms, and an opportunity to build a cohesive challenge for the '08 General Election ... very possibly headed by a then-seasoned-and-experienced, widely known Edwards.