Reply
Wed 26 May, 2004 08:30 am
I read your sig line as "I put the crass in procreaton..." :-D
That's a lot.
Glad to see someone's doing something sensible to stop the over-population of the world and protect our dwindling natural resources...
Quote:I read your sig line as "I put the crass in procreaton..." :-D
i was no where near arkansas august '03 -- i swear!
the hubby's named jim-bob, and all the youngins' names start with a "J"...
Either that couple does nothing other than have sex, a religious fanatics who take the suggestion to be fruitful and multiply... literally (8 of the kids have biblical names) or they're ego maniacs.
I believe that someone could really want that many kids. Two sets of twins in there, too.
But I tend to agree with Grand Duke.
I saw a momma mallard yesterday. She only had 11. 'Course, she's not from Arkansas.
From the point of view of resources, pollution etc., I believe that couples shouldn't have more than 2 kids - giving a 1:1 ratio of replacement down the generations and at least slowing down the destruction of the planet. 3 is not so bad, but 4 or more (on purpose) is just selfish, IMHO.
that jim-bob couldn't resist when he saw that arkansas mama in her hot pants way back when.
the rest is history...
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace