Leftists and "Humiliation"

Or, they (the Muslim populations) could turn the terrorists over or kill them themselves instead of hiding them and their weapons in their homes, gardens, and mosques.

The Sopranos-----isn't that a trashy program produced by the imperialistic-----hhhmmmm whats the name?

Simple jealousy I guess---sigh----we have the only game in town. It must be infuriating for the rest of the world.

McGentrix wrote:

Or, they (the Muslim populations) could turn the terrorists over or kill them themselves instead of hiding them and their weapons in their homes, gardens, and mosques.

So, despite your post, you are not accusing Muslims in general of aiding terrorists?

I am not prejudiced against Muslims. I am prejudiced against people acting like terrorists and people who hide, support, and fund terrorists. I am prejudiced agains anyone who wants me, my family, or my friends dead. I am prejudiced against any system that would preach that terrorism is a fine idea and that by sacrificing oneself and taking as many infidels with them they will find heaven and virgins. I am prejudiced against any system that would preach hate towards others. This does not sound like Islam to me, therefore I must not be prejudiced against Islam.

prej·u·dice ( P ) Pronunciation Key (prj-ds)
n.

--->An adverse judgment or opinion formed beforehand or without knowledge or examination of the facts.
--->A preconceived preference or idea.
--->The act or state of holding unreasonable preconceived judgments or convictions. See Synonyms at predilection.

--->Irrational suspicion or hatred of a particular group, race, or religion.
--->Detriment or injury caused to a person by the preconceived, unfavorable conviction of another or others.

tr.v. prej·u·diced, prej·u·dic·ing, prej·u·dic·es

--->To cause (someone) to judge prematurely and irrationally. See Synonyms at bias.
--->To affect injuriously or detrimentally by a judgment or an act.

Link

Itry to avoid generalizations, unless they all called for. Do you deny that Muslims will hide muslim terrorists? Do you deny that we are waging a war againt Muslim fanaticism? Do you deny that the middle east is a hotbed of Muslim fanaticism and a birthplace of derisive teachings that go against everything Mohammed taught? Do you deny that Muslim fanaticism is out of hand?

I pre-judge people based on the actions of their peers.

Do you deny that Muslims will hide muslim terrorists?

Your quote above doesn't make a whole lot of sense. To make my point I provide you with this question:

Do you think that good Christians would hide a Christian fundamentalist fanatic who bombed abortion clinics?

I don't think that would be any more likely to occur than a good Muslim hiding a Muslim fundamentalist terrorist. If you think that the likelyhood is higher in the Muslim example, please explain why.

But we are not talking about chritians hiding christians, or hindu's hiding hindu's, or christians crashing planes into skyscrapers, or strapping bombs to themselves, or anything like that. We are talking about fanatical muslims and the actions they perpetrate.

Happened on this thread and skimmed it -- very lightly. I just don't believe that the "incidents" that triggered this thread actually happened.

Furthermore, bush and his coherts continually break what little of international law there is.

Ben Stein's comments this weekend that say we can do what we like because we are the good guys, followed up by General Kimmit's response to the revealation that the wedding was probably a wedding sound like the US has given white hats to the AMericans and black hats to the Iraqis.

BoWoGo says;
Nah Nah Nah, my abuse is worse than your abuse.

I submit that it is this kind of thinking that led to the Holocaust.
The German people were led to believe that the "abuse" caused by the left wingers, Socialists and Communists( supposedly but erroneously made up solely of Jews, according to Adolf Hitler) during the Weimar Republic, was eroding their Folk Culture.

. I don't think Hitler knew about feeding people feet first into shredders.

I made reference to the fact that the Nazis used the same kind of propaganda that the radical fringe Iraqis use.

There is no moral equivalancy and you can't claim that there is.

There is no moral equivalancy between what Saddam has done and what we did in Abu Ghraib.

There is no moral equivalancy between what Saddam and the murderers who flew into the WTC did and what we have done in Abu Ghraib.

Anyone who is so idiotic to think that there are no soldiers in our army who will not commit atrocities is a complete liberal partisan.

I hope that you are acquainted with the second world war.

If the liberals had dared, they would have said:
"sure, Hitler is gassing Jews, but we are supposed to be better and not have fire bombed Dresden to kill thousands."

If the liberals had dared, they would have said: Sure, we might lose a million men if we invaded Japan but, we are supposed to be better and not have dropped the Atomic Bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

You may not be aware of it, Mr. Stillwater, but the real difference between the radical murderers of Mr.Berg and our army is that our miscreants are punished by courtmartial.

You may not be aware of it, Mr. Stillwater but the real difference between our society and the radical killers in Iraq is that our doctors work to replace the ears cut off of Iraqi "criminals" by Saddam and our doctors work to replace the Right hands of Iraqis with robot arms after they were cut off by Saddam.

There is a difference between our culture and radical Islam's culture. It is a huge difference. We operate according to the Rule of Law. They operate according to the Rules of Tribal Vengence. If you can't see the difference, I feel sorry for you.