The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie

Obama Says U.S. ‘Less Racially Divided’

I'm not disputing the public defender's essay, but I've personally known individual blacks whose lifestyles were just as far removed from the social pathologies described therein as our own lives. I don't believe these social problems are inherent in an individual's race as Charles Murray and others maintain, but that it's a matter of culture. Of course, culture is often very difficult to change.

I was extremely repulsed by the Jim Crow of my youth, and my conviction in that regard has not changed. I'm also not playing party politics here. I have no faith in any political party or ideology. I just wanted to point out that there really is no single black community.

While I certainly don't support individual cops who abuse their position of authority, I must say that I have a great deal of respect for the work that cops must do to protect the rest of us. They are in an extremely difficult position. They come into contact with the very worst of mankind. Many cops seem to have more self-control than most of us would. They must work under a lot of stress when they perceive the public as not supporting them.

I'm actually surprised there aren't more incidents of beatings by cops. I once saw a documentary in which several cops were arresting a man who had forced his teenage daughter into prostitution. Absolutely heartrending! The arresting cops exercised great self-control. Many of us, myself included, might have been strongly tempted to give the father a good beating, which he would have richly deserved. (The father was white, by the way.)

Sorry can not agree with that idea

Why It’s Impossible to Indict a Cop

I can also tell you that the incidence of DWI was lessened by stiffer sentences.

As I had said if long sentences was the answer we would be the most peaceful society on earth.

And for the record you couldnt be more wrong about the second amendment. It was not only to provide the people the ability to fight tyranny, it was also to insure that the people did not have to rely on government to provide them with protection from things such as robbery.
BTW, the Court has established that the police are not responsible to provide protection for any one individual...thats why you would have no standing in a suit against the police for failing to protect you from robbery.

SO ENDTH THE LESSON.

In California, it was a point that was include in the ballot vote, where Californians will decide the approval or disapproval of same gender marriage.

The Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has the authority and influence to stop that issue in the voting ballot, he practically ignore it or gave green light to such a vote.

The majority of the people in California voted NO to same gender marriage.

In front of this vote, which was unexpected by many, the Governor of California went against the will of the people, and he declared invalid such a vote arguing that was unconstitutional.

The people of California, had all the opportunity to bear arms, go to the government building and pull out the tyrant.

Knowing that the people of California has the right to keep and bear arms and that they can use them to put the tyrant out of office by force, with the 100% back up of the US Constitution, question:

Will you stop the right of the people of California... or you will defend the tyrant instead?

The cops were murdered in cold blood, by a black male, who had previously shot his girlfriend. He then entered a subway station , took out his gun and shot himself to death.

Your comments about "apologies and promises" has absolutely nothing to do with the facts at hand. Stick to the facts and ignore the crap!

And for the record you couldnt be more wrong about the second amendment. It was not only to provide the people the ability to fight tyranny, it was also to insure that the people did not have to rely on government to provide them with protection from things such as robbery.
BTW, the Court has established that the police are not responsible to provide protection for any one individual...thats why you would have no standing in a suit against the police for failing to protect you from robbery.

Libs Call Jet Blue Racist For Giving Cops Free Flights To NYPD Funeral

So the President isn't racist enough for you.

Teachers, who are trained with the best knowledge on rights of carrying guns, teach with specific input, that the Constitutional second amendment is not in regard of self defense and neither to kill animals, but was directed by the writers of the Constitution to maintain people with arms in case the government becomes a tyranny.

Still, you didn't answer my question. Will you let the people to pull out the tyrant of his government office or you will defend the tyrant instead?

Time for Comcast-NBC to Fire Al Sharpton