40
   

The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie

 
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 09:53 am

Media
Eat The Press
Calderone: The Backstory
Third Metric

NY Daily News Makes Huge Statement With Front Page On Eric Garner Decision
The Huffington Post | By Ed Mazza

Posted: 12/03/2014 11:05 pm EST Updated: 5 hours ago



The New York Daily News is making it clear where the paper stands on the decision by a grand jury not to indict New York City police officer Daniel Pantaleo for the choking death of Eric Garner.

"WE CAN'T BREATHE," the paper declares on its front page, along with a photo showing Garner before he was brought down by a chokehold at the hands of Pantaleo.
Post by New York Daily News.

The cover echoes some of the last words of Garner, who cried out "I can't breathe" several times before collapsing on July 17. A medical examiner later said the death was the result of the chokehold, a move banned by the NYPD, and ruled it a homicide.

UPDATE: Early Thursday, the New York Post released its front page... and the newspaper took a completely different approach:

Today's @nypost front page following the Eric Garner decision: pic.twitter.com/wDmIdGchTy

— Katie Hommes (@katiehommes) December 4, 2014

Newsday, the Long Island newspaper, also released an editorial cartoon on the decision:

Political cartoon by @MatttDavies of @Newsday. #EricGarner #NYPD. http://t.co/SI69qneMn3 pic.twitter.com/JcZ3XYCDkY

— David Reich-Hale (@drhli) December 4, 2014

But it's the Daily News cover that quickly became a hot topic on social media.

Some days you think print is over. This is not one of them. RT @KimBhasin: The @NYDailyNews front page for tomorrow: pic.twitter.com/8Fe4zm0yFU

— Nicky Woolf (@NickyWoolf) December 4, 2014

Powerful front page. #EricGarner RT @justinjm1: "WE CAN'T BREATHE" - Daily News tomorrow via @harrysiegel pic.twitter.com/vEBuXBrB9Z

— Yann Schreiber (@YannSchreiber) December 4, 2014

The Daily News also published an editorial saying the grand jury's decision "has the earmarks of a gross miscarriage of justice."

"The ruling is painfully far harder to understand than the Missouri grand jury’s decision not to indict for the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson," the editorial states, pointing to the widely circulated video of Garner being brought down by Pantaleo.

The editorial also predicts that the decision will have consequences.

The grand jury’s apparent determination that Pantaleo had properly subdued Garner will heighten raw racial friction over the killings of black men by white cops here and elsewhere, and, still worse, intensify a belief that the justice system offers no redress.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 10:08 am
@bobsal u1553115,
My lord there is not going to be a black man alive by the end of next year at the rate cops are just for the fun of it are killing them.

Footnote in the good old days when looters let alone fire bombers would have been shot on sight Ferguson black deaths toll of late by cops would been larger.

In any case if the rate of cops killings black men increase by a few thousands percents it just might match the rate that black gangs are killing other blacks.

Killings that we seems not to care about.
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 10:08 am
http://upload.democraticunderground.com/imgs/2014/141204-rep-peter-king-no-indictment-necessary-in-eric-garner-homicide.jpg
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  0  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 10:09 am
@bobsal u1553115,
http://www.wsmv.com/story/25459694/police-officer-goes-above-and-beyond-for-sumter-teen


Police officer buys bed, TV, Wii for teen
Posted: May 07, 2014 10:41 PM EDT Updated: May 17, 2014 10:42 PM EDT
By Carolyn Callahan
Connect
SUMTER, SC (WIS) -

A Sumter police officer went above and beyond for a 13-year-old boy.

A few weeks ago, 13-year-old Cameron Simmons called Sumter police because he was upset after fighting with his mom. The teenager told police he didn't want to live in the house with his family anymore.

Officer Gaetano Acerra responded to the call.

"I said, ‘You have it good, you have a roof over your head,'" said Acerra. "I told him I would try to help him out, and here we are now."

The officer brought Simmons home, and realized the boy didn't have a real bed. In fact, Simmons didn't have nearly anything he needed for a bedroom.

"My heart went out for him," said Acerra. "I thought the little things that he needed I could give him, to make him a happier kid."

A few weeks after the call, Acerra showed up at Simmon's house with a truck full of gifts.

"Bed, TV, desk, chair, a Wii game system that somebody donated to me because of the story I told them," said Acerra.

Simmons told Acerra that because of the new bed, his back won't hurt anymore.

Simmons was sleeping on an inflatable mattress. The teenager said the mattress would slowly deflate throughout the night.

"I didn't do this for publicity or to get people to notice me," Acerra said. "I did it because I could. It was the right thing to do and I think people should do things like this."

Officer Acerra said he has gained more than just a few pats on the back; he's gained friend.

Acerra gave Simmons his cell phone number, and told him to call anytime.

Acerra plans to bring Simmons more bedroom furniture, including a dresser and mirror.

A spokesperson from the Sumter Police Department said Thursday since the story aired, Officer Acerra has fielded a few calls from people wanting to help the Simmons family.

Click here for donation information.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 10:39 am
Hypothetical scenario:
Found this hypothetical on a FB group I frequent

I am a doctor working in an Emergency Room. A patient comes in with a medical emergency. I begin administering a medication that has been banned by the hospital due to potentially lethal reactions. The patient begins saying, " I can't breath. I can't breath."
I don't stop the medication. Instead, I keep administering it. The patient dies.Meanwhile, I am on video and there are witnesses.
What do you think would happen to me? Would I lose my job and license to practice? Would I face charges? Would the liability insurance I am required to carry have to compensate the patient's family if they sued for damages?
Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.
Perhaps policemen should be held to similar professional standards since they are in the position of authority in life and death situations
Thanks for allowing me to rant.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 10:41 am
Domestic Violence in Police Families

http://www.purpleberets.org/violence_police_families.html

Officer Curt Lubiszewski is not an anomaly. Hundreds of women, partners of police officers, are beaten every year. Just this April, Crystal Brame was killed by her estranged husband, the police chief of Tacoma, Washington. Here are some facts on cops as batterers.

Domestic violence is 2 to 4 times more common in police families than in the general population. In two separate studies, 40% of police officers self-report that they have used violence against their domestic partners within the last year. In the general population, it's estimated that domestic violence occurs in about 10% of families.
In a nationwide survey of 123 police departments, 45% had no specific policy for dealing with officer-involved domestic violence.
In that same survey, the most common discipline imposed for a sustained allegation of domestic violence was counseling. Only 19% of departments indicated that officers would be terminated after a second sustained allegation of domestic violence.
In San Diego, a national model in domestic violence prosecution, the City Attorney typically prosecutes 92% of referred domestic violence cases, but only 42% of cases where the batterer is a cop.

[img]Cartoon depicting police domestic violence[/img]

Special Problems for Victims

Her batterer always has a gun (often many guns and other weapons) and is trained to use it.
He knows how to inflict pain and leave no marks or bruises.
He's trained to intimidate by his presence alone, and to use his body as a weapon.
He lets her know he has the power to harm or kill her and get away with it, or have others do it for him.
How can she call the police? He is the police!
He tells her that if she does call police, the officers (his colleagues and friends) will believe him and not her ... and he's right.
He often threatens that if she reports to police he'll lose his job, and if that happens, she's dead.
He has access to surveillance tools like phone taps, police scanners, vehicle tracking devices, and audio and video recording equipment to stalk or monitor the victim's activities.
The batterer or his fellow officers will often "patrol" the victim's house, work place, children's school or daycare center.
Friends, family and service providers are afraid of the batterer and thus afraid to get involved.
Domestic violence advocates may share her information with the police. (Other than Purple Berets and Women's Justice Center, all domestic violence advocates in Sonoma County work for either the police or district attorney's office.)
He knows the location of battered women's shelters.
He knows the court system, often testifies in court, and knows district attorneys, judges and bailiffs personally.
Jurors assume police officers would not lie in court.

If Your Batterer is a Cop

Even more than other battered women, when you decide to leave or prosecute you need to move strategically and get good advice from the outset.

Find an advocate who is independent from police agencies and experienced in working with police officer violence.
Make a comprehensive safety plan: put money aside he doesn't know about, identify where you can flee with your children, etc. Domestic violence shelters can help you with this anonymously.
While the tendency is to take "baby steps" so as not to enrage him, once you make your move, the more power you can muster, the more likely you can stand up to the power you'll be up against. Report to police or district attorney, get a restraining order and report to his police agency all at once.
If police and DAs are unresponsive, go to the press.
Contact Purple Berets for "Police Domestic Violence: A Handbook for Victims."

(This information was gathered from the National Center for Women and Policing, Life Span, and Abuse of Power.

For a recent media report on domestic violence by police, click here.
0 Replies
 
giujohn
 
  2  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 10:42 am
To all the dumb asses: (you know who you are)

The Garner arrest.
1. The police officers were ordered by their management to enforce the violation, re; Loosies, because of citizen complaints.
2.The use of force was NOT because he was selling Loosies, it was for resisting arrest...which can be CLEARLY scene on the video.
3. If you cant breathe you cant talk.
4. If you cant breathe you shouldn't be able to resist letting the cops put the cuffs on you.
5. Garner couldnt be given a citation because he had prior arrests and failure to appears.
6. The legal word "Homicide"as used by the M.E. in New York means death caused by another and is not a crime until the court so determines.
7. The cop did not use a choke hold. It was a head lock and by my count did so for about 10 seconds then switched to holding his head flat down by pushing on the side of his head.
8. A choke hold is not illegal.
9. Garners medical condition and his decision to resist arrest caused his death.
10. If every time a person screams, "I cant breathe" when fighting the cops and the cops has to let up, NO ONE WOULD EVER BE PUT IN CUFFS.
11. Four cops arresting a 6' 3" 350 man who is resisting is NOT excessive.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 10:45 am
@BillRM,
Oh the deaths of police officers in the line of duty run around a 150 deaths a year.

You know the ones who decided not to open fired on a 300 pound teen charging them.
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 10:45 am
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 10:47 am
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 10:50 am

Cops Who Shot Innocent Women Will Be Sent Back Into Field

Posted on: March 29th, 2014 5 Comments
Tagged with:california police, law abuse, law enforcement misconduct, police brutality on women, police shoots, usa police

Eight South-Californian police officers who mistakenly shot two innocent women during the hunt for a spree killer last February are returning to the field. The cops who shot at the wrong pickup truck over 100 times injuring both women will soon continue to work on California streets.

“I have confidence in their abilities as LAPD officers to continue to do their jobs in the same capacity they had been assigned,” said Police Chief Charlie Beck.
“In the end, we as an organization can learn from this incident and from the individuals involved.”

Former LAPD officer Christopher Dorner went on a killing spree in February 2013, leaving four people dead and three injured. LAPD organized one of the largest manhunts in its history, searching for Dorner in two U.S. states and Mexico.

On February 7, 48-year-old Margie Carranza and her 71-year-old mother Emma Hernandez were driving around delivering newspapers when their blue Toyota pickup was mistaken for Dorner’s gray Nissan Titan by the police. They fired more than 100 shots at the vehicle, injuring the women and demolishing the pickup. The city of Los Angeles agreed on a $4.2 million settlement plus the $40,000 compensation for the truck. During the trial, Chief Charlie Beck claimed that all responsible officers would be severely punished.

“Discipline could be anywhere from extensive retraining up to termination,” said Beck, but the only disciplinary action was to place the officers on desk duty. A recent internal memo revealed that the officers will undergo additional training and then join their colleagues in patrolling the streets.

“I trust that the training will be extensive and the department and officers will move forward from this tragic incident stronger and wiser from the lessons learned,” said Steve Soboroff, the president of the civilian Police Commission.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 10:52 am

NYPD Cops Sued For Pepper-Spraying a 5-Month-Old

Posted on: April 7th, 2013 7 Comments
Tagged with:law abuse, law enforcement misconduct, nypd, police brutality on children, police misconduct, police use pepper spray, usa police

Marilyn Taylor and her husband Dehaven McClain are suing NYPD for civil rights violations, assault, battery, negligence and violations to the state and federal constitutions after an incident at a Manhattan train station when they and their three children got pepper sprayed.

Taylor and McClain were with their 5-month-old baby and 2 and 4 years old children. As they were on their way to board the L-train, McClain opened the service door so he could push the baby stroller through. Police officers, identified as Maripily Clase, Suranjit Dey and Jermaine Hodge accused the family of trying to skip a fare and one of the cops pepper sprayed Taylor, but some of the spray hit the children too. The lawsuit states that “the pepper-spray caused the children to scream out and choked the two-year old, who went into fits of vomiting”.

Taylor was arrested and the cops pushed her down the stairs so hard she got bruises on her wrists and back from handcuffs. She was released with an adjournment in contemplation of a dismissal, meaning all charges against her will get dropped if she doesn’t get arrested again within a certain period of time.

Weeks after the incident, the children are still suffering from the emotional trauma caused by it.

They are now too scared to ride the subway and get very frightened every time they see a police officer and also have nightmares and trouble sleeping at night. NYPD didn’t release any statements regarding this lawsuit.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 10:52 am

Chattanooga Deputy Fired for Raping a Woman

Posted on: January 26th, 2014 2 Comments
Tagged with:law abuse, law enforcement misconduct, police rapist, usa police

Willie Marshay Greer has been fired from Sheriff’s Office patrol deputy position after a woman accused him of rape. The 33-year-old former Hamilton County deputy is charged with official misconduct and aggravated rape.

A female driver was stopped for speeding on Birchwood Pike around 1 a.m. Greer reportedly wrote the 26-year-old woman’s name on his hand and returned to his vehicle. He allegedly found an open warrant for her arrest after running her name through the database, and returned to handcuff and arrest her.

The woman said that he repeated the line “I could let you go, but you’d owe me” several times. He suggested that they “need to talk about this” so the woman agreed to follow him in her car to 11300 block of Thatch Road. She said that she didn’t want to get into trouble so she complied and Greer uncuffed her.

Once they arrived to the spot, Greer handcuffed her again, sat her in his patrol car and forced her to perform oral sex on him. Afterwards, he offered the victim a drink from a Wendy’s cup, which she took and drove away.

Employees of a nearby Wendy’s confirmed that a black police officer had purchased a fruit punch earlier that evening.

The woman identified Greer as the rapist after a photo line-up. Greed admitted to having sex with the woman but claimed it was consensual. The investigation showed many of his statements were “false and misleading”.

Sheriff Jim Hammond said that Greer had passed a routine background check and that nothing indicated that he was capable of doing something like this.

“The vetting process was normal, there was nothing to indicate that this kind of behavior might happen, no reason to believe that this would have occurred.”

Greer has been released on $50,000 bail until the beginning of the trial.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 10:59 am
Resisting arrest is also a crime. If they both did not resist arrest they would be alive.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 11:02 am
@bobsal u1553115,
So are you saying that all cops are bad, that we should disband the police forces and allow us to cater to our own affairs?

I'm getting the feeling that you don't like cops Bob.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 11:04 am
@Baldimo,
Quote:
I'm getting the feeling that you don't like cops Bob.


Bob doesn't even like Bob.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 11:05 am
@BillRM,
The 10 Deadliest Jobs:

1. Logging workers
2. Fishers and related fishing workers
3. Aircraft pilot and flight engineers
4. Roofers
5. Structural iron and steel workers
6. Refuse and recyclable material collectors
7. Electrical power-line installers and repairers
8. Drivers/sales workers and truck drivers
9. Farmers, ranchers, and other agricultural managers
10. Construction laborers

Cops have have 150 job related deaths per year? Bull ****.

http://www.njlawman.com/2002_line_of_duty_deaths.htm

AND cops deaths have been falling as crime rates have fallen for the last thirty years. And deaths also include auto accidents, heart attacks, etc.

http://www.sfgate.com/nation/article/On-duty-police-deaths-may-hit-70-year-low-in-2013-5084998.php

http://www.fbi.gov/news/podcasts/thisweek/line-of-duty-deaths.mp3/view

http://www.officer.com/article/10760709/2012-line-of-duty-deaths?page=2


Cop killing civilians have been going up yearly.

Why are you so sadly misinformed?
giujohn
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 11:06 am
bobsal u1553115

FBM, we know this is you...were not as stupid as you.
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 11:06 am
@Baldimo,
Just the murdering scum you seem to have man crushes on.
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Dec, 2014 11:07 am
@giujohn,
You are more stupid than you think, twinkie.
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 2.78 seconds on 11/18/2024 at 06:39:32