40
   

The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie

 
 
tony5732
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 19 Aug, 2015 09:05 pm
@oralloy,
Yes.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  5  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 03:23 am
What a heady mix of bigotry, ignorance, piss and fear. That's why my turds of a feather post is on +4.
tony5732
 
  -4  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 04:09 am
@izzythepush,
Well, it got at least one thumb for making me laugh, a bobsal buddy thumb, your original thumb, and I think revelette or mr. Snood showed up for a post or two to talk about charity or something. Or maybe someone else got a laugh, who knows? I don't think anyone was thumbing that down though that was CLASSIC.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
revelette2
 
  3  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 08:39 am
Official Police Story About Shooting Of 14-Year-Old Begins To Unravel

Quote:
When Radazz Hearns was shot seven times by police in Trenton, New Jersey earlier this month, police claimed the 14-year-old pulled out a gun and attempted to shoot them while running. Now, the attorney general’s office says those allegations are unsupported, and an eyewitness says Hearns was actually unarmed and trying to pull up his pants as he ran.

According to the attorney general’s office, Hearns was one of three teenage boys questioned by three Targeted Integrated Deployment Effort (TIDE) officers near an apartment complex, after a shooting was reported nearby. An anonymous police source alleged Hearns ran away from the cops and reached for what the officers thought was a gun. At one point, they say, Hearns turned around while running and attempted to shoot at them. The three officers opened fire, hitting Hearns seven times in the legs and butt.

Eyewitness Rhonda Tirado, who watched the chase and shooting from her home, paints a different picture of what happened. Tirado alleges the boys were laughing and joking for 15 minutes before the cops arrived near her house, and agrees that the three males were confronted by the officers. She also contends Hearns tried to flee. But Tirado says the teenager looked like he was trying to pull his pants up — not grabbing a weapon.

“Those police were amped and they didn’t give that little boy a chance,” she explained to NJ.com. “There was no room for no chase. They just shot that little boy right there.”

The attorney general’s office has since conducted a preliminary investigation and concluded that the anonymous police source’s claims are inconsistent with its findings.

The family attorney representing the 14-year-old’s family, Samuel Anyan Jr, maintains Hearns was unarmed. A .22-caliber handgun was discovered at the scene later, but investigators have not connected the weapon to the boy.

“I don’t think those little boys had no clue what was going on,” Tirado continued. “I think they was at the wrong place at the wrong time.”

All three officers are on administrative leave, and Hearns was released from the hospital on Monday.


snood
 
  5  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 08:46 am
@revelette2,
Police might've misrepresented the facts in an effort to cover themselves? Shocker. That's never happened before.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 09:14 am
@tony5732,
Glad to hear you're finally concerned about racism, even if it's only racism in the UK and it's not fuelled by compassion but a mix of Anglophobia, insecurity, inadequacy and ignorance.

Never mind that, here's a website you can donate to.

http://fergusonsolidaritytour.com/donate/
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 12:56 pm
@snood,
I know I've never heard of this before. Must be a typo.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 01:03 pm
@tony5732,
Maybe you'd like to show me where any of that is punishable with a death sentence? My white privilege lets me know I'd be out on bond in at most 48 hours.

This how the cops in my town handle that situation:



We have good cops mostly here in Marble Falls.
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 01:19 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
No I don't think this is how it normally goes, that doesn't mean it never happens. Some of the video's you post just plain crap with no follow up as to what an investigation actually says. Oh wait, that's right you wouldn't believe the investigation anyways unless it said the cops were guilty. Does Mike Brown ring a bell?

The difference between us, is that I'm willing to admit that some of the cops are guilty of exactly what you claim they are, while you would never be willing to admit that some of them are innocent. You have a vendetta against the police and I really really hope you never have need of their services. What a blow to the ego having to call them for help, when you spend so much time damning them.
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 01:31 pm
@Baldimo,
BS. All of it. I have never ever said either "all cops" or "most cops". You keep trying to turn it into an all or none proposition.
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 01:48 pm
Miami cop investigated for jumping into vehicle with suspect

By Charles Rabin




[email protected]

A 47-second video that shows a Miami police officer placing a handcuffed teen in the back of a patrol car, then jumping on top of him as the woman filming the scene has her camera knocked away, has landed the officer in hot water and prompted an internal affairs investigation.

Late Thursday night Miami police hadn’t named the officer. They hadn’t named the man in handcuffs or described the charges against him. And it was unclear who the woman was who took the video, who swatted the camera away from her, or why the officer jumped into the back of the patrol car on top of the man.

What was clear: The video was going viral, having received almost 80,000 views by 11 p.m. Thursday. And the actions of the officer were being investigated late into the evening.


Police Brutality #FreeYayo
Posted by Marilyn Smith on Thursday, August 13, 2015

“We have seen the video and we have launched a full Internal Affairs investigation into the matter,” said Miami Police Maj. Delrish Moss. “We take that responsibility very seriously. The officer involved in the incident will be relieved of duty as we investigate.”

The incident, which took place at about 5 p.m. inside the Liberty Square housing project, also caught the attention of police union president Javier Ortiz, who posted it on his Facebook page and released a statement.

“While the video may seem concerning to some, the FOP [Fraternal Order of Police] is confident that when everything is analyzed within the totality of the circumstances, it will be concluded that the police officer was doing what he is supposed to be doing: Protecting our community,” said Ortiz.

The release of the video comes at a particularly sensitive time for law enforcement. Video captured encounters between police and residents in New York, Cleveland, South Carolina and Baltimore over the past 13 months sparked major protests.

In at least three of those instances, a black man or child died during an altercation with a white police officer. In Miami Thursday, an unidentified black officer jumped into the patrol car with a black teen.

The Liberty Square video, which was originally posted on the Facebook page of a woman who says her name is Marilyn Smith, begins with officers standing around a dark car, then a black police officer escorts a young black man in tan long shorts and dark T-shirt into the back of a patrol car. At the 37-second mark, the officer appears to leap on top of the man through the back passenger door.

The officer can be clearly seen lying on the back seat, while the man in handcuffs is out of view. Then, as someone appears to swat away the woman’s phone camera, the picture goes fuzzy and she can be heard saying, “Don’t touch my phone baby, move.” Then the video ends.

Moss said the officer’s gun and badge will be taken away during the investigation, and he will be taken off the street.

“Internal Affairs is still working and taking statements,” Moss said late Thursday night.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 01:48 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
Are you kidding me? You and a black kid are walking down the street. Who's most likely to get stopped?

Do you think I've never been pulled over or stopped by the police? Why answer the questions you pose as you already have your own bias?

Quote:
You and a black applicant are up for a job, who's most likely to get it.

The same answer bias applies here. As for my experience in the work place, I've worked in plenty of jobs where there were minorities. About the only place I did work where there was only 1 black guy, was in the construction field. I don't know why but there are not many blacks in construction in San Diego. Plenty of hispanics though. When I worked in call centers for 3 different major telecom companies there were plenty of all race's, hispanics, blacks, whites and asians. Many of my managers in these companies were minorities. I didn't encounter many middle eastern people until I got into higher end IT work, and lots and lots of programmers and development people are from either India or Pakistan. Sorry I keep destroying your perceptions of me. You have lived a much more "white" life than I have. I've actually struggled in my life and had to make my way in the world. This lilly white fantasy world you were brought up in wasn't the same one I was brought up in or even live in. Did I mention before that I was married to a woman for 18 years that was half white and half black, that my kids are then also part black? She encountered racism when she was growing up, but it wasn't from white people. It was from black people who didn't think she was black enough. The only fights she was ever in when she was younger were with black girls who didn't like her "light" skin and "white girl hair". Her father who was black, was an Officer in the Navy. So we can play this "racism" game all day long. As I've pointed out in the past, I think you and your ilk are the true racists.

Quote:
Who's most likely to live in a 'red-lined' neighborhood, you or the black kid who didn't get the job and was harrassed by the cops walking home through George Zimmer's community?

The above is a perfect example of your bias in these questions.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 01:50 pm
@Baldimo,
You weren't shot regardless of whatever outrage you seem to have gotten away with. Thank your white privilege.
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 01:52 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
No my friend that is you. Look at how you attack those who don't bash the cops? I've asked questions of these video's and made comments about them and all I ever received from you is name calling and ridicule. I didn't agree with your perception so I was either stupid or some sort of racist. It's the way all you guys work. You and Izzy are like attack dogs with no stop command.
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 01:57 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Okay, I'm sure that's what it was.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 01:59 pm
@Baldimo,
And yet there you are again yammering some form of ad hominem not even on topic. Says a lot more about you than it does Izzy or me.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 02:00 pm
@Baldimo,
You don't deny it. Thats a sign of improvement.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 02:09 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Aren't you the one who made the claim about all or nothing? I was just pointing out how you work the all or nothing response to things. You don't like your BS being pointed out?
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Thu 20 Aug, 2015 02:48 pm
@Baldimo,
You're not stupid because you disagree, you're stupid because you're incapable of seeing the link between charity and education, (amongst other things). It had to be explained to you, and even then I don't think you got it. That has nothing to do with politics.
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 11/25/2024 at 11:36:58