Do you need one, then?
Quote:blatham wrote:
perc
My argument in its entirety is that the use of 'full and complete' is simply a lie, and that it is a lie designed for home consumption.
I'd far rather have a right-leaning government that had integrity to the truth (say, as a government led by McCain would likely have) than a left-leaning government that lied about so much of importance as has this one.
Blatham old pal
I'm amazed by your brazen attempt in your first sentence to bludgeon me with an unsupported absolutism and then attempt to regain the moral high ground with simplistic quacking about preferring a right leaning gov't (with integrity) over a lying left leaning gov't.
Are you trying to tell me that after months of touting the virtues of socialism you would actually prefer the pragmatic values of a right leaning gov't with integrity. Are you saying that you recognize the impossibility of ever having a left wing gov't with integrity and are you acknowledging that there has never existed a left wing gov't with an aversion for lying when politically expedience dictated it? Are you accepting the truth that left wing elitism has been exposed?
You see, you didn't actually respond to anything he said. In your first paragraph you denigrated what he said instead of refuting what he said.
In your second paragraph, you start appealing to extremes instead of examining and responding to what he said.
Come back with a cohesive argument.
Cycloptichorn
