@Lordyaswas,
Lordyaswas wrote:Omsig and CJ.....You two really go out of your way to demonstrate your idiocy, don't you.
Yes, we
don't.
U use words in ignorance of their meaning.
Is English your first language ?
If we really
were of a mental age below 3 years,
as u allege, then we 'd not be able to write & u 'd never have known of us.
Lordyaswas wrote:Or fanaticism.....much the same thing.
Its not. Take the Japs, for example.
Thay were
fanatical. If thay had been limited
to acting as tho thay were below that mental level,
then thay 'd not have been able to defeat your military forces
in Singapore or Hong Kong, etc. nor cud thay have executed
their raid on Pearl Harbor. It is very foolish of u to equate
idiocy with fanaticism. Many more Americans wud be still
be alive if those fanatics really
had been idiots.
On the other hand,
persevering on the side of good logic,
in favor of personal freedom,
including liberty of self defense
is better than mental impairment.
In a contest of power between a predator and his prey,
between malicious dogs and children, I usually favor the victim
and prefer that he or she predominate in power, thus
surviving the confrontation. That requires possession
of the necessary means to do so.
The lord believes that children who are killed by
bloodthirsty dogs are so few as to be casually sacrificed
in order to keep the rest of the children living in docile helplessness, as he prefers.
David
