33
   

Does mob mentality rule A2K?

 
 
nononono
 
  0  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 08:54 am
@Lordyaswas,
Quote:
Something that ruins ones eyesight, maybe?


yep, I heard that it'll make you go blind...
Lordyaswas
 
  3  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 08:56 am
@nononono,
Don't worry. Just keep doing it until you need specs.
izzythepush
 
  -1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 08:57 am
@Lordyaswas,
Exactly, I particulary liked it when he was talking about sustainable fishing. "If you're thinking of eating one of our scaly friends try a Pollock, dab or any of the other **** ones."
0 Replies
 
nononono
 
  0  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 08:58 am
@Lordyaswas,
I'll only do it when Jesus isn't watching...
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 01:02 pm

Burglar Shot by 12 year Old Girl With Glock
Defending Her Home:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wS7LKwt1j18


11 Year Old Girl With Pink .22 Caliber Rifle
Defends Her Home From 3 Burglars:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiiQQP4-Ijw

Brave defender girl says: "I felt proud of myself."

Farmer says: NO. U r too young. U shud have
put the gun down to protect the burglars!
Let the 3 criminals do whatever thay wanted.
Take your inspiration from Neville Chamberlain; peace at ANY price.
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 01:11 pm
@oralloy,
OmSigDAVID wrote:
For SURE, if u handled a SHOTGUN,
then u 'd have no trouble with a .38 revolver. A shotgun will rock u back.
I 've never been much of a shotgun person.
oralloy wrote:
The right kind of semi-auto
(one that is designed to have the mechanism use up as much energy as possible)
can really tame excessive recoil nicely.

Browning gas-operated shotguns and rifles are probably the best at it.
Acknowledged. Thank u.


OmSigDAVID wrote:
The only gun I 've posted in this forum is
my double action and single action 2 inch .44 Taurus Model 445.
I don 't recommend single action revolvers for defensive wear.
I have not posted pictures of any of my single action revolvers.
Thay r too bulky and not well suited for long term defensive wear,
unless in hip holsters; un-wieldy.
oralloy wrote:
With a revolver with excessive recoil
(say a gun carried for defense against bears), single-action is
preferable to double-action.

Double-action revolvers have a hump in the grip, right above where
the skin stretches between your thumb and forefinger when you are
holding the gun. This is necessary to hold the double-action mechanism.
However if the gun has a strong recoil, this hump collides
with your hand and causes discomfort.

Single-action revolvers have a grip with a smooth curve,
and are much more easygoing with strong recoil.
For hunting animals,
I 'd use single action, or more likely, shoulder-mounted weapons,
but I don t choose to be a hunter.





David
0 Replies
 
wmwcjr
 
  2  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 01:38 pm
@nononono,
https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/498456832/hC3B596C2/
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 02:15 pm
From Slate.com.
Quote:
194 Children Have Been Shot and Killed in America in 2013. This Has to Stop.
Lordyaswas
 
  3  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 02:32 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
"Take your inspiration from Neville Chamberlain; peace at ANY price...."


What the hell has Chamberlain got to do with guys who have a gun fetish?

Do you even have the first clue as to the context in which that statement was made?
coldjoint
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 04:21 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
194 Children Have Been Shot and Killed in America in 2013


That is what happens when the family breaks down. You idiots expect people to rely on you people to find a solution to the problem, you(progressives, statists whatever)created that you are using to disarm the American public? Everything will be used, childrens lives mean zip to the left. And importing more gang members will make sure of it. Just saying.

JTT
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 04:50 pm
@coldjoint,
Was this just a copy and paste, cj, or did you type/copy it to practice your spelling?

You haven't answered my question about whether you think its good or bad to espouse communist principles.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 06:55 pm
@Lordyaswas,
Lordyaswas wrote:
What the hell has Chamberlain got to do with guys who have a gun fetish?

Nonsense about gun fetishes is something that Freedom Haters use to denigrate those who value Freedom.

I don't believe there was any assertion that such nonsense was related to Neville Chamberlain's quote.
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  2  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 07:39 pm
I think we've confirmed the mob mentality theorem - suddenly this thread is about merkin gun control.
ehBeth
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 08:00 pm
@hingehead,
hahahaha

who's hiding a gun in their merkin?

that'd be a very special concealed carry

hahahahahahahaha
glitterbag
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 08:26 pm
@ehBeth,
OMG, that is such a great straight line, but I just can't. I'm somebody's grandmother for Christ sake. I will consider sharing via PM, but only if your not one of the creepy dudes.
JTT
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 08:33 pm
@glitterbag,
Quote:
I'm somebody's grandmother


Poor kid. Don't try to pass on any of your "knowledge", gbag.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 09:43 pm
@Lordyaswas,
DAVID wrote:
"Take your inspiration from Neville Chamberlain; peace at ANY price...."
Lordyaswas wrote:
What the hell has Chamberlain got to do with guys who have a gun fetish?
Its not "a gun fetish"; its having the wisdom and competent presence of mind
to be properly prepared to survive predatory violence, as distinct from
living in a state of docile helplessness. Chamberlain was an apostle
of peace at any price, including exposing England to nazi conquest
by passive inaction, rather than actively getting on a war footing.
As very distinct from Churchill, Chamberlain was a coward.
I was scorning his filosofy (that means "philosophy") and
recommending against it insofar as personal defense is concerned.



Lordyaswas wrote:
Do you even have the first clue as to the context
in which that statement was made?
Yes.

Lord, do u believe that when the English reacted to Churchill's defeating
the 3rd Reich by firing him and hurling him ignominiously out of office,
that thay meant to vindicate Chamberlain's state of mind ?





David
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 09:59 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
You're the predator - with a gun.
Quote:
If October is like every other month, 46 women in the United States will be murdered with a gun by an intimate partner.

Public attention was gripped by the most recent mass shooting, at the Navy Yard in Washington, but during Domestic Violence Awareness month, we need to focus on the fact that women face a heightened risk of gun violence.

Women are more than three-and-a-half times as likely to be killed by an intimate partner as men. A gun in a household with a history of domestic violence increases by 20 times the risk that a woman will be killed there, compared to households without guns. Similarly, more than 75 percent of stalking victims are women — and stalkers use weapons to harm or threaten their victims in 1 out of 5 cases. The statistics show: Guns plus a history of domestic violence or stalking equals increased risk of death to women.

Tragically, there are numerous stories that bear this out. Zina Daniel obtained a restraining order against her estranged husband after he made numerous threats against her. Teri Lee sought police protection and obtained a restraining order against her ex-boyfriend after he broke into her home and threatened her with butcher knives. Stacey Sutera notified police when an acquaintance began stalking her, and ultimately helped secure a criminal conviction against him. Laura Acevez sought police protection from an abusive ex-boyfriend and told police that he owned guns. These women were all shot and killed by the men who abused them, even after seeking help from the criminal justice system. Unfortunately, there are so many others.

Congress recognized the risks posed by domestic abusers with guns by passing legislation in the 1990s prohibiting people convicted of domestic violence misdemeanors or subject to certain restraining orders from possessing guns. These laws have been effective in preventing some dangerous individuals from obtaining guns: Since November 1998, more than 104,000 gun sales to convicted domestic abusers have been prevented by the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, as well as an additional 44,000 sales to abusers subject to restraining orders.

Yet women like Daniel, Lee, Sutera and Acevez are still vulnerable to gun violence. Why?

Because federal laws have significant loopholes that permit dangerous predators easy access to guns. Women legislators — Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) in the Senate and Representatives Lois Capps (D-Calif.) and Janice Hahn (D-Calif.) in the House — have introduced bills to address these issues. Their bills are still in committee and we urge Congress to act quickly to pass this important legislation to better protect women.

There are four significant weaknesses in the current law that leave women vulnerable to gun violence. First, background checks are not required for all gun sales. The current background check system makes it easy for felons and domestic abusers to buy guns with no questions asked from unlicensed sellers at gun shows, online and just about anywhere else. This is how Daniel’s killer was able to buy the gun he used to murder his estranged wife and two others, despite the restraining order against him.

Second, the current gun possession ban on domestic abusers fails to cover dating partners. Federal law protects women victimized by spouses or co-parents, not dating partners. This is why Lee’s abuser was permitted to own the gun he used to kill her despite the restraining order she obtained to protect herself from him.

Third, convicted stalkers can buy guns. Seven states bar people convicted of misdemeanor stalking crimes from possessing guns. But federal law allows these convicted stalkers to buy guns, despite the often increasingly violent nature of their behavior. This is why Sutera’s murderer was able to own a gun even after his conviction for stalking her.

Fourth, law enforcement isn’t doing enough to take guns away from domestic abusers. Too often domestic abusers who are prohibited from gun ownership are not forced to surrender guns they already own. This is why Acevez’s killer was able to keep his guns, even after she obtained a restraining order and informed police that he continued to own guns.

The bottom line is that it is just too easy for men who seek to harm women to buy and possess guns. As fatal gun violence against women continues, Congress must take action to close these loopholes that put all women in danger.

Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 10:04 pm
@cicerone imposter,
look up where there is less crime then anywhere else!
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  1  
Mon 14 Jul, 2014 10:12 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
If October is like every other month, 46 women in the United States will be murdered with a gun by an intimate partner.


OhOh gun owners have a war on women.
 

Related Topics

Lola at the Coffee House - Question by Lola
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
Adding Tags to Threads - Discussion by Brandon9000
LOST & MISPLACED A2K people. - Discussion by msolga
Merry Andrew - Discussion by edgarblythe
Spot the April Fools gag yet? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Great New Look to A2K- Applause, Robert! - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Head count - Discussion by CalamityJane
New A2K feature requests. - Discussion by DrewDad
The great migration - Discussion by shewolfnm
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 10:45:11