Reply
Mon 19 May, 2014 02:06 am
Context:
Next, Harris goes on to outline what he terms a "science of good and evil" – a rational approach to ethics , which he claims must necessarily be predicated upon questions of human happiness and suffering. He talks about the need to sustain "moral communities," a venture in which he feels that the separate religious moral identities of the "saved" and the "damned" can play no part. But Harris is critical of the stance of moral relativism , and also of what he calls "the false choice of pacifism ." In another controversial passage, he compares the ethical questions raised by collateral damage and judicial torture during war. He concludes that collateral damage is more ethically troublesome. "If we are unwilling to torture, we should be unwilling to wage modern war," Harris concludes.
@oristarA,
Not really.....it more means that it is a necessary assumption for his argument.....the validity of his argument is based upon the assumption that human happiness and suffering is the measure by which we delineate good from evil.
Not a universal assumption, by the way....see Peter Singer. And also I myself!
@dlowan,
dlowan wrote:
Not really.....it more means that it is a necessary assumption for his argument.....the validity of his argument is based upon the assumption that human happiness and suffering is the measure by which we delineate good from evil.
Not a universal assumption, by the way....see Peter Singer. And also I myself!
Thanks.
So "predicated" means "assumed" here?
@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:
So "predicated" means "assumed" here?
"Built upon" or "based on"