e-brown - I love (Oops, in your book this is a lie, sorry) appreciate your point of view - a good debate is so refreshing.
I understand your BIOLOGICAL take on being human, can't find fault with that. The thing you said about the truth being so powerful is also compelling, can't find fault with that.
However, if we both agree TRUTH is best - you forgot or perhaps never experienced certain TRUTH about LOVE.
LOVING someone or something isn't about a preconceived idea about who or what that person or thing is. Love, at least in my life, is about UNDERSTANDING and CHOICE. That's the other side of our BIOLOGICAL existence.
Your appearance however viewed is not the WHOLE of who you are. If your theory was universal, and if everything in life was only about reproduction and continuance, then why don't we all see only the basic structure of being human. It is because I believe we as humans are more complex. That is why we EVOLVE. That is why we CREATE. That is why we seek KNOWLEDGE. That is why so many great artists, poets, and leaders have been people with PASSION and VISION.
When I have experienced LOVE in my life, it seems as tho it was always the by-product of wanting MORE than the surface of someone or something. Not FANTASY per se, a better connection to the infinite, a higher self if you will.
This far supersedes the basics. Yes, the basics exist for sure. But I contend, that is not the whole of who we are as humans. LOVE is a by-product of our human experience. Maybe in your estimation is not as tangible as sex, hunger and the need for shelter but as humans we can certainly CHOOSE to define each of our own personal IDEAS about LIVING.
Best, J,
P.S. Oh by the way, even chubby, balding, cynical men need LOVE too. (Just Teasing!!)
Eva wrote:
If that isn't real love, I don't know what is.
Eva - I'm with you sister!