2
   

Failed to understand "at whose approach we scatter"

 
 
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2014 10:32 pm

Does "at whose approach we scatter" mean "we scatter at whose approach/ we are so different in our opinions about their method"?

Context:

Research is riddled with strong characters; Walter Gratzer applauds a spirited attempt to get their measure.BOOK REVIEWED-Rebels, Mavericks, and Heretics in BiologyEdited by Oren Solomon Harman and Michael R. Dietrich
Yale University Press: 2008. 352 pp. $40.00, £25
The proposition put in the mouth of Lemuel Gulliver by Jonathan Swift that “there is nothing so extravagant or irrational which philosophers have not maintained for truth”, still holds. The zealots, monomaniacs and obsessives at whose approach we scatter are in general just that, and nothing more.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 2 • Views: 370 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
View best answer, chosen by oristarA
McTag
  Selected Answer
 
  2  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2014 03:38 am
@oristarA,

Quote:
zealots, monomaniacs and obsessives at whose approach we scatter


When we see them coming, we run away.
(meaning, we think their ideas are so strange, we will have nothing to do with them)
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Apr, 2014 07:06 am
@McTag,
Cool.
Thanks.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Failed to understand "at whose approach we scatter"
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 10/02/2024 at 02:17:36