1
   

Unfit for Office

 
 
Fedral
 
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 09:59 am
Unfit for Office [/u]
I was on Mr. Kerry's boat in Vietnam. He doesn't deserve to be commander in chief.

BY JOHN O'NEILL
Tuesday, May 4, 2004 12:01 a.m. EDT

HOUSTON--In 1971, I debated John Kerry, then a national spokesman for the Vietnam Veterans Against the War, for 90 minutes on "The Dick Cavett Show." The key issue in that debate was Mr. Kerry's claim that American troops were committing war crimes in Vietnam "on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command." Now, as Sen. Kerry emerges as the presumptive Democratic nominee for the presidency, I've chosen to re-enter the fray.

Like John Kerry, I served in Vietnam as a Swift Boat commander. Ironically, John Kerry and I served much of our time, a full 12 months in my case and a controversial four months in his, commanding the exact same six-man boat, PCF-94, which I took over after he requested early departure. Despite our shared experience, I still believe what I believed 33 years ago--that John Kerry slandered America's military by inventing or repeating grossly exaggerated claims of atrocities and war crimes in order to advance his own political career as an antiwar activist. His misrepresentations played a significant role in creating the negative and false image of Vietnam vets that has persisted for over three decades.

Neither I, nor any man I served with, ever committed any atrocity or war crime in Vietnam. The opposite was the truth. Rather than use excessive force, we suffered casualty after casualty because we chose to refrain from firing rather than risk injuring civilians. More than once, I saw friends die in areas we entered with loudspeakers rather than guns. John Kerry's accusations then and now were an injustice that struck at the soul of anyone who served there.

During my 1971 televised debate with John Kerry, I accused him of lying. I urged him to come forth with affidavits from the soldiers who had claimed to have committed or witnessed atrocities. To date no such affidavits have been filed. Recently, Sen. Kerry has attempted to reframe his comments as youthful or "over the top." Yet always there has been a calculated coolness to the way he has sought to destroy the record of our honorable service in the interest of promoting his political ambitions of the moment.

John Kennedy's book, "Profiles in Courage," and Dwight Eisenhower's "Crusade in Europe" inspired generations. Not so John Kerry, who has suppressed his book, "The New Soldier," prohibiting its reprinting. There is a clear reason for this. The book repeats John Kerry's insults to the American military, beginning with its front-cover image of the American flag being carried upside down by a band of bearded renegades in uniform--a clear slap at the brave Marines in their combat gear who raised our flag at Iwo Jima. Allow me the reprint rights to your book, Sen. Kerry, and I will make sure copies of "The New Soldier" are available in bookstores throughout America.

Vietnam was a long time ago. Why does it matter today? Since the days of the Roman Empire, the concept of military loyalty up and down the chain of command has been indispensable. The commander's loyalty to the troops is the price a commander pays for the loyalty of the troops in return. How can a man be commander in chief who for over 30 years has accused his "Band of Brothers," as well as himself, of being war criminals? On a practical basis, John Kerry's breach of loyalty is a prescription of disaster for our armed forces.
John Kerry's recent admissions caused me to realize that I was most likely in Vietnam dodging enemy rockets on the very day he met in Paris with Madame Binh, the representative of the Viet Cong to the Paris Peace Conference. John Kerry returned to the U.S. to become a national spokesperson for the Vietnam Veterans Against the War, a radical fringe of the antiwar movement, an organization set upon propagating the myth of war crimes through demonstrably false assertions. Who was the last American POW to die languishing in a North Vietnamese prison forced to listen to the recorded voice of John Kerry disgracing their service by his dishonest testimony before the Senate?

Since 1971, I have refused many offers from John Kerry's political opponents to speak out against him. My reluctance to become involved once again in politics is outweighed now by my profound conviction that John Kerry is simply not fit to be America's commander in chief. Nobody has recruited me to come forward. My decision is the inevitable result of my own personal beliefs and life experience.
Today, America is engaged in a new war, against the militant Islamist terrorists who attacked us on our own soil. Reasonable people may differ about how best to proceed, but I'm sure of one thing--John Kerry is the wrong man to put in charge.

Mr. O'Neill served in Coastal Division 11 in 1969-70, winning two Bronze Stars and additional decorations for his service in Vietnam.

Link
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,758 • Replies: 38
No top replies

 
John Webb
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 10:06 am
Even if 50% or even 100% accurate, no one could be worse than Bush and his land-grabbers.
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 10:11 am
Just curious--have they found anyone yet who wants to talk about serving with Bush in Alabama?
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 10:23 am
Perhaps one of his beer guzzling, coke-sniffing buddies?
0 Replies
 
John Webb
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 10:30 am
Surely there is enough money in his family to bribe someone to say nice heroic things about him?
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 10:35 am
errr, yeah, so the author of the article was on the same boat - but not at the same time. Rolling Eyes Fine, the guy has an opinion, but being on the same boat at a different time doesn't give him any special knowledge or authority.

I love when the media does stuff like that. Hoping people won't get past the title and heading. pfffffffffffffffffft.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 10:38 am
Kinda like they went to different high schools together, huh?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 10:39 am
So what would qualify Kerry to be president? What has he done to qualify himself?
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 10:41 am
I believe that would be a different topic, mcG.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 10:42 am
This is a paltry counter attack to the majority of fellow soldiers and superior officers who laud Kerry for his service. That he ended his military career protesting a foolish and illigitimate war is only to his credit. The politicians have to take the blame on this war and any military action which goes wrong. The soldiers are taking their orders.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 11:01 am
ehBeth wrote:
I believe that would be a different topic, mcG.


I find it interesting that you didn't say the same to D'artagnan when he wrote "Just curious--have they found anyone yet who wants to talk about serving with Bush in Alabama?"

You guys seem to jump to Kerry's defence by pointing at Bush instead of talking up Kerry. Does Kerry offer so little?
0 Replies
 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 11:26 am
ehBeth wrote:
errr, yeah, so the author of the article was on the same boat - but not at the same time. Rolling Eyes Fine, the guy has an opinion, but being on the same boat at a different time doesn't give him any special knowledge or authority.

Actually, it does. When Kerry left, his crew probaby stayed on the same boat under the new commander. The new commander had the opportunity to observe his men and other men, and note any atrocities or war crimes that they committed. He saw none.

It's starting to look like Kerry exaggerated the stories of war crimes just like he exaggerated the stories of the injuries that got him his Purple Heart medals. And the medals, just like John Kerry, ended up on both sides of the fence.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 11:32 am
Tarantulas wrote:
And the medals, just like John Kerry, ended up on both sides of the fence.


Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 11:48 am
McGentrix wrote:
Tarantulas wrote:
And the medals, just like John Kerry, ended up on both sides of the fence.


Laughing Laughing


McGentrix and Tarantulas....joined at the hip Laughing
0 Replies
 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 11:58 am
Yeah, he's my half-step neighbor-in-law.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 12:01 pm
Gee, that's the same joke Jon Stewart told on "The Daily Show." Plagerizing your humor again?
0 Replies
 
John Webb
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 12:11 pm
[quote="McGentrix"]So what would qualify Kerry to be president? What has he done to qualify himself?[/quote]

Easy. He is not named George W. Bush, nor Adolph Hitler. Laughing
0 Replies
 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 12:34 pm
Lightwizard wrote:
Gee, that's the same joke Jon Stewart told on "The Daily Show." Plagerizing your humor again?

A friend of mine was using that joke at least ten years ago. I don't watch "The Daily Show."

John Webb wrote:
[quote="McGentrix"]So what would qualify Kerry to be president? What has he done to qualify himself?

Easy. He is not named George W. Bush, nor Adolph Hitler. Laughing [/b][/quote]
Some of these people would look at Beelzebub himself as preferable to President Bush. It's like a major portion of the Democrat party has become mindless zombies.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 12:40 pm
Tarantulas wrote:
Lightwizard wrote:
Gee, that's the same joke Jon Stewart told on "The Daily Show." Plagerizing your humor again?

A friend of mine was using that joke at least ten years ago. I don't watch "The Daily Show."

John Webb wrote:
[quote="McGentrix"]So what would qualify Kerry to be president? What has he done to qualify himself?

Easy. He is not named George W. Bush, nor Adolph Hitler. Laughing [/b]

Some of these people would look at Beelzebub himself as preferable to President Bush. It's like a major portion of the Democrat party has become mindless zombies.[/quote]

What's the difference between the two?
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 May, 2004 12:45 pm
Tarantulas, Piffka addressed this war crime thing very handily. I'll see if I can find it.

OK, here it is:

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=584203

Quote:
John Kerry was part of a veterans group which was trying to make sense of the Viet Nam war experience. He had debriefed, if you will, other vets. The original material that was so badly misquoted in Fedral's post was an introductory statement. At no time did John Kerry state he had personally witnessed or participated in war crimes.


In other words, Kerry didn't say it was HIS men. It was what other Vietnam vets had told him in his capacity as part of his work with Vietnam Veterans Against the War.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Unfit for Office
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 11:46:35