@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:
chai2 wrote:If a person has a 4.0 average, what is the problem with saying that in a cover letter and or resume?
around here the thinking is that the actual marks don't matter - and that includes for academic positions
if someone won an award that reflected a high mark or class placement, that might go on a resume for an entry-level job
marks aren't what h.r. is told to look for. they are given lists of skills/abilities/traits and those are the words they screen for. that's why I suggested a few pages back to identify specific words used in ads for the particular role Mrs B is looking for.
h.r. is looking for ways to get rid of resumes. providing marks/gpa is an easy target. especially if the key words aren't in the resume.
Right, but this is for an entry level job, first one out of school for this field.
Wow, it blows my mind to hear people say marks don't matter. So what, it was enough that someone gets into a college, but once you're there no employer cares if you barely scraped by.
Seriously, if that's the case, why do any college students or parents of the student stress over their exams and grades. What does it matter when the "C" recent graduate looks just as good as the "A" recent graduate, when all each of them have done is work at the mall or mcd's?
I could continue that train of thought with saying why bother with the expense, time and stress of college at all if the employer doesn't care if the graduate did well or not.
Believe me, I'm not arguing the fact that for someone who has been out of school for a couple of years, and has experience under their belt, the GPA shouldn't be on the resume. It just seems that if you're new in the workplace, and in this case maintained a 4.0, all A's, it's doesn't seem like it would be bad to mention it.