12
   

The Real Story Behind the Phony Canceled Health Insurance Scandal

 
 
Reply Thu 10 Apr, 2014 10:54 pm
The Real Story Behind the Phony Canceled Health Insurance Scandal - MotherJones
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/11/obamacare-canceled-health-insurance

In 2009, when President Barack Obama first promised that people who liked their insurance coverage would be able to keep it under the Affordable Care Act, he overlooked one critical fact: Many of the health policies that Americans like are terrible insurance plans that were created to scam consumers.

Over the past few weeks, insurers have been sending out hundreds of thousands of notices alerting customers that their current plans won't comply with the ACA as of January 1 and that the owners of these plans need to find alternatives. Republicans and conservatives pointed to the development as evidence that Obama lied. Several prominent right-wingers who were covered under these plans, including Fox News contributor Michelle Malkin, have helped fuel this outcry. When Malkin got her cancelation notice, she went on the Twitter warpath. She later wrote a piece for the National Review slugged, "Obama lied. My health plan died." Malkin had a high-deductible plan from Anthem Blue Cross that doesn't meet the minimum coverage requirements created by the ACA. So she has to get a new plan on the state health exchange. Malkin blamed Obamacare for destroying the individual insurance market.

The media have covered these complaints with gusto, as if the cancelations are a genuine crisis and indication of a failure of Obama's health care law. The ACA was designed specifically to prevent insurance companies from peddling lousy insurance plans and to force these firms to replace these subpar products with affordable plans providing better and effective coverage. The plans being canceled are ending because they offered insufficient coverage—and only a few years ago both Rs and Ds were upset about these kinds of plans. But there's been collective amnesia about the shoddy plans that GOPers have happily exploited in recent days. Perhaps Obama should have said, "Those of you who obtain insurance on the individual market can keep your plans unless it’s the sort of rip-off plan the ACA will forbid. Otherwise, you will be offered new options that actually give you decent coverage at a decent price."


Here's what led to the current situation: In the early aughts, the number of people with employer-based coverage declined dramatically. That left an increasing number of Americans uninsured and about 30 million adults underinsured and at serious financial risk. The Commonwealth Fund estimates that between 2003 and 2010, the number of underinsured Americans nearly doubled.

The fastest growing group of underinsured was people in households around the national median income, the $40,000 to $50,000 annual income range—folks who make too much to qualify for Medicaid but who don't have employer-sponsored plans or who can't afford the ones they're offered. Insurance companies jumped into the void with a lot of products Consumer Reports dubbed "junk insurance." These were plans that barely qualified as insurance because they had very low caps on coverage or weren't even really insurance at all. Many were merely medical discount programs that didn't protect against health-related financial calamity. Insurance companies, including many of the biggest, marketed these products aggressively and often misleadingly—which was made easier by the lack of disclosure requirements in the sale of health insurance. Regulators struggled to protect consumers because so many of the junk plans were perfectly legal.

Take the case of HealthMarkets Inc., a company owned by the Goldman Sachs Group and Blackstone Group, two Wall Street giants. It had run-ins with state regulators repeatedly regarding its sale of junk health insurance on the individual market. The company paid out more than $40 million in settlements with state attorneys general over its deceptive sales practices between 2008 and 2010. In 2009, for example, after a long investigation, the Massachusetts attorney general fined the company $17 million and banned it from doing business in the state for five years.

HealthMarkets was also plagued with individual consumer lawsuits and class actions. Among those who sued the company was Doug Christensen, a cancer survivor who bought a HeathMarkets plan from the National Association for the Self-Employed. A sales rep had knocked on the door of his office and offered him a policy for $434 a month that would cover him and his wife, and include $100,000 worth of chemotherapy coverage. He didn't realize that the bargain policy had a host of limitations, including a cap on drug expenses at $1,000 per day, which wasn't close to what the treatment ended up costing when his bone cancer returned. Doug eventually died, and his widow was left with $450,000 in unpaid medical bills because the policy was so bad. She won a $1.7 million settlement with the company in 2005.


Stories like these had been standard fare for years before Obamacare. Even Republicans got outraged. In 2008, Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) launched an investigation into AARP's limited benefit health plans and held a hearing on junk insurance plans. He was inspired by a Wall Street Journal article about a Texas woman, Lisa Kelly, who was diagnosed with leukemia and required cancer treatment. She was referred to the M.D. Anderson Center in Houston. When she called to schedule her first chemo appointment, the hospital told her to bring with her a check for $45,000. Kelly had a limited-benefit policy sold by AARP that required her to pay all of the medical costs up front. Then it would reimburse her $7,500 per procedure, which didn't cover the treatment cost.

Grassley's staff investigated the AARP's plan and discovered that the insurance company was using highly deceptive marketing practices. When he made the results public, Grassley decried the evils of the individual health insurance marketplace saying, "It's not better than nothing to encourage people to buy something described as 'health security' when there's no basic protection against high medical costs."

AARP ended up discontinuing some, but not all, of the plans. Today, the individual market is still plagued by consumer abuses that have left many people at risk of medical bankruptcy or lack of access to care. "A lot of insurance that is sold today is like a Swiss cheese insurance policy. It's insurance that doesn't really insure,” says Ron Pollack, the executive director of Families USA, a health care advocacy group that supports the ACA.

Many of the plans on the individual market are so bad that people who have them might as well be uninsured. "The only people who like those plans are people who have never needed them," says Nancy Metcalf, a senior editor at Consumer Reports. "They haven't figured out yet how terrible they are. They think they have good coverage but they don't."

A good example might be Dianne Barrette, 56, who appeared on CBS News with Jan Crawford last week for a segment about the wave of cancelations. Barrette, a realtor in Florida, was upset because her $54 a month insurance plan was being canceled. She believed a new one would cost her more than $500 a month due to Obamacare. "What I have right now is what I'm happy with," she said. "I just want to know why I can't keep what I have. Why do I have to be forced into something else?"

But here’s the rub: Barrette's $54 plan wasn't even insurance. When I talked to her, she was unsure of what her plan covered. But she said it was what Blue Cross calls a "supplemental" or discount plan, which only pays $50 toward doctor's office visits and a few other out-patient services, including mammograms. What her plan doesn’t cover: hospitalization. Not at all. So if she gets hit by a car, the people ultimately picking up the tab will be the hospital and everyone else (by way of higher medical costs). If she gets cancer, she’s basically out of luck. "It's all I could afford," she told me.

Blue Cross was selling these plans in malls and other retail insurance "shops" in an effort to target young people who don't have or don't think they need health insurance, luring them in with cheap premiums of between $24 to $54 a month. The plans came with a not-well-disclosed caveat that they were not designed to replace hospital-surgical plans, which Blue Cross encouraged people to buy—provided the purchasers could get past all the exclusions for preexisting conditions.

Blue Cross is now canceling 300,000 plans in Florida, and, no doubt, a lot of them are such "Go Blue" plans. (A spokesman from Blue Cross of Florida wouldn't answer any specific questions about which plans are getting canceled.) The ACA was designed to replace plans like the one Barrette bought. And every plan sold on the Obamacare exchanges must provide a minimum and meaningful level of coverage, including free preventive care, mental health and maternity coverage, hospitalization, and rehabilitation services that are indispensable for anyone who has a disability, who becomes injured in a bad accident, or who has a degenerative disease such as multiple sclerosis. These plans don't have annual or lifetime coverage limits of any sort. And the insurance companies selling plans on the exchange must disclose coverage terms in such a way that people know what they're getting and can compare similar plans.


Much of the recent media coverage treats the old junk plans as a national treasure, their loss a true scandal. Far from being a victim of Obamacare, Barrette should have been a story about someone who will benefit immensely from the Affordable Care Act. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation premium calculator, Barrette, who makes about $30,000 a year, is eligible for an annual tax credit of up to $3,967 a year, which could get her a silver plan on the exchange for $234 a month (in cost to her), or a bronze plan, with slightly higher out of pocket costs, for $97 a month. True, with the bronze plans, she’d be paying $43 a month more, but in return, she would have true protection and access to health care, not sham coverage. A bronze plan would replace her $50 doctor's office discount with free preventive care services, including mammograms, cover hospitalization and other services, and cap her out of pocket costs at slightly more than $6,000 a year. Barrette should be cheering the death of her old plan.

The same is true of the other conservatives who've groused about losing a plan, including Malkin. As Metcalf points out, "If they're having to cancel out a plan with a $10,000 deductible and end up with a plan with a $2,500 deductible, that's a better plan, period." Pollack says, "As people now get real protection, the premiums may be somewhat higher, but it's a different product and you're saving money on the back end. The Affordable Care Act eliminates lousy coverage, which ultimately saves cost for people when they receive care."



Stephanie Mencimer is a staff reporter in Mother Jones' Washington bureau. For more of her stories, click here. You can also follow her on Twitter. RSS | Twitter
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 12 • Views: 6,153 • Replies: 143

 
InsuranceLady
 
  4  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 03:17 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
It pays to know what you are buying. Insurance is very complicated and too few people understand that an insurance policy is a legal contract not to be signed on a whim. Buying your insurance based solely on the price tag can end up with some bad consequences. Make an appointment with an agent, ask questions and sit there until you know what you are buying. Then, keep a copy of the policy you bought; it may come in handy later if you need to appeal a claim.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 16 Apr, 2014 05:16 am
@bobsal u1553115,
bobsal u1553115 wrote:
The Real Story Behind the Phony Canceled Health Insurance Scandal

The story is, the Left lied, and got busted for it. Nothing phony about that.

Possibly they had to lie in order to get the plan passed in the first place. I'm unsure why they continued the lie after that point though, as it just made everything worse in the end. It would have been much better if they had simply started explaining that it was necessary to force people out of their current plans in order to provide a broad risk pool for the new plans.


bobsal u1553115 wrote:
In 2009, when President Barack Obama first promised that people who liked their insurance coverage would be able to keep it under the Affordable Care Act, he overlooked one critical fact: Many of the health policies that Americans like are terrible insurance plans that were created to scam consumers.

Possibly a fact, but not all that critical, as people were forced to leave good policies as well.


bobsal u1553115 wrote:
The media have covered these complaints with gusto, as if the cancelations are a genuine crisis and indication of a failure of Obama's health care law. The ACA was designed specifically to prevent insurance companies from peddling lousy insurance plans and to force these firms to replace these subpar products with affordable plans providing better and effective coverage.

Funny how it also canceled plans that offered coverage superior to anything offered on the exchanges.


bobsal u1553115 wrote:
The plans being canceled are ending because they offered insufficient coverage—and only a few years ago both Rs and Ds were upset about these kinds of plans.

If the coverage is insufficient, that would mean coverage bought from the exchanges is even more so, as the exchanges do not offer plans as good as some that were canceled.


bobsal u1553115 wrote:
Perhaps Obama should have said, "Those of you who obtain insurance on the individual market can keep your plans unless it’s the sort of rip-off plan the ACA will forbid. Otherwise, you will be offered new options that actually give you decent coverage at a decent price."

Bad idea, as that lie would also have been busted, when all the people with very good plans had them canceled.



Sheesh! Instead of continuing their silly lies (which will only continue to be busted by the Republicans), how about the Left start telling the truth: It is necessary to force people out of their old plans in order to create broad risk pools for the new plans.

That's a straightforward argument that people would accept and find reasonable, and it would have the benefit of actually being the truth.
McGentrix
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 16 Apr, 2014 06:51 am
Oh good, more Obama apology for the dedicated few that still believe...
revelette2
 
  2  
Reply Wed 16 Apr, 2014 07:22 am
@McGentrix,
It is kind of not a good thing to get complacent in politics, before you know it while your not looking the tide start to change just as soon as you get confident. I find it happens almost every time.

Americans increasingly prefer Democrats on healthcare: Reuters/Ipsos poll
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Wed 16 Apr, 2014 08:37 am
@oralloy,
Stunning inability to accept reality. You are the champ.

How well do you like your overpriced insurance that can cut you off at any point, charge you what ever it wants, raise rates whenever it wants?

If your so keen on that kind of trouble, well its on you. Don't try to force the rest of us into your bad decisions regarding health care.

You want to be stiffed, so be it. Its your funeral.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Wed 16 Apr, 2014 08:38 am
@McGentrix,
[img]Oh good, more Obama apology for the dedicated few that still believe... [/img]

What apology?
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  3  
Reply Wed 16 Apr, 2014 08:44 am
@oralloy,
Quote:
If the coverage is insufficient, that would mean coverage bought from the exchanges is even more so, as the exchanges do not offer plans as good as some that were canceled.
Really? Can you provide us an actual example to support that? I want the actual policy, not some RWers interpretation of it.
A policy isn't good just because it costs $50 a month while not covering major medical.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Wed 16 Apr, 2014 08:48 am
@bobsal u1553115,
Excellent!
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Apr, 2014 09:22 am
@InsuranceLady,
Good advice. Too bad insurance companies don't list in simple declarative sentences in large print what they covered what they don't.
RABEL222
 
  2  
Reply Wed 16 Apr, 2014 08:45 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
They do. Ive got two 250 page books that tell you what they cover. All you need is a lawyer to decode them for you.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 16 Apr, 2014 09:12 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
bobsal u1553115 wrote:
Stunning inability to accept reality. You are the champ.

I note that you weren't able to point out any facts that I am wrong about.


bobsal u1553115 wrote:
How well do you like your overpriced insurance that can cut you off at any point, charge you what ever it wants, raise rates whenever it wants?

It is unlikely that my previous insurance was overpriced.

I did not like the idea of rescissions one bit.


bobsal u1553115 wrote:
If your so keen on that kind of trouble, well its on you. Don't try to force the rest of us into your bad decisions regarding health care.

The fact that I refuse to stay silent in the face of untrue claims about my previous health insurance does not mean I have made any bad decisions. Nor does it mean I am trying to force anyone into anything.


bobsal u1553115 wrote:
You want to be stiffed, so be it. Its your funeral.

You have a very active imagination.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 16 Apr, 2014 09:13 pm
@parados,
parados wrote:
oralloy wrote:
If the coverage is insufficient, that would mean coverage bought from the exchanges is even more so, as the exchanges do not offer plans as good as some that were canceled.

Really? Can you provide us an actual example to support that?

My previous insurance had a maximum out of pocket cost of $250 a year. It was also a traditional plan where I could get treated anywhere I wished without any need to worry about networks.

The best plan I could get on the exchanges has a maximum out of pocket cost of $5,100 a year. And it is a PPO where I have to stay within their network in order to be fully covered.

However, it does have the benefit of being $100 a month cheaper than my previous policy.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Wed 16 Apr, 2014 10:24 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Thanks!
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Wed 16 Apr, 2014 10:25 pm
@RABEL222,
Thats just not right.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Wed 16 Apr, 2014 10:32 pm
Gallup: Uninsured PLUNGES to 12.9%- LOWEST EVER IN POLL
Gallup: Uninsured PLUNGES to 12.9%- LOWEST EVER IN POLL

by teenvote

Big news that was kind of hidden today. Gallup reported that the monthly survey revealed that the uninsured percentage had fallen from 18% last fall to 12.9% in the first half of April! If that holds for the month it will be the LOWEST uninsured rate since Gallup started taking this poll in 2008! For more on this story, check out Charles Gaba's blog here.

Despite the attacks and the constant Republican obstruction, Obamacare is working!

The uninsured will continue to fall throughout the year as more sign up on the exchanges (some are eligible before the next open enrollment, due to a life changing event) and medicaid.

Thank you President Obama!

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/04/16/1292627/-Gallup-Uninsured-PLUNGES-to-12-9-LOWEST-EVER-IN-POLL


There has been a statistically significant and meaningfully large decline in the percentage of uninsured U.S. adults. The uninsured rate peaked at 18.0% in the third quarter of 2013, the highest rate measured since Gallup and Healthways began tracking in 2008. The uninsured rate has been consistently trending downward since then, falling to 15.0% in March and further to 12.9% for April 1-14 polling. If the rate for the first half of April holds throughout the month, it will be the lowest monthly uninsured rate in 76 months of tracking.

Gallup Poll buries the lede: Uninsured down to 12.9% in first half of April!
http://obamacaresignups.net/14/04/16/gallup-poll-buries-lede-uninsured-down-129-first-half-april

Wow!

Eugene Robinson: "It’s all over but the shouting: Obamacare is working."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024823164
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Thu 17 Apr, 2014 07:39 am
@oralloy,
Your understanding of your insurance is not your insurance.

What was the yearly cap on your insurance? What was the lifetime cap on your insurance? What treatments were actually covered? What was not covered? No insurance covers EVERYTHING no matter how experimental or no matter how many times you use it. I highly doubt your insurance would have covered any doctor visit anywhere. That would be far too costly for any insurance plan to try to cover. Until we can see the actual paperwork, we are left to speculate about how much you really didn't know about your insurance.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Thu 17 Apr, 2014 11:49 am
@parados,
That's what 'most' people who are buying into ACA has learned; there's no caps and atrocious co-pays for anything that has to do with our health.

All those people who said they're paying higher premiums under ACA doesn't say much about the ceiling and co-pays they had to pay under their previous coverage. Even AARP was charged with fraud for their health insurance coverage.

Here's the link on the AARP health plan fraud.
http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news/lawsuit-aarp-medigap-plans-defraud-seniors-122613.html

TNCFS
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Thu 17 Apr, 2014 09:01 pm
@parados,
Just ask oral boy to show us a copy of his health insurance policy. Would really love to see that over his dreamland interpretation of it vs. ACA.
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Apr, 2014 09:26 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Good idea. The problem is oraloy lives with his parents and his insurance comes from the state. He's carrying Fox's water. What the nit wit does not understand is that Fox wants him uninsured and preferably dead.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The Real Story Behind the Phony Canceled Health Insurance Scandal
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 01/21/2022 at 12:17:15