2
   

The third generation of GE crops would include traits to allow production of pharmaceuticals...?

 
 
Reply Mon 17 Mar, 2014 05:20 am
Failed to understand " The third generation of GE crops would include traits to allow production of pharmaceuticals and products beyond traditional food and fiber":

It seems to meaning many aspects:
1) the third generation of GE crops can produce medicines/pharmatheuticals;
2) such GE crops can produce food and fiber (?) which are far better than traditional food and fiber;
3) ?

Context:

Genetically engineered crop traits have been classiied into one of three generations (Fernandez-Cornejo, 2004). The irst generation features enhanced input traits such as herbicide tolerance, resistance to insects, and resistance to environmental stress (like drought). The second features
value-added output traits such as nutrient-enhanced seeds for feed. The third generation of GE crops would include traits to allow production of pharmaceuticals and products beyond traditional food and fiber. While the irst GE crop approved by USDA!ˉs Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) and commercialized in 1994 was a crop with a strictly second-generation trait (FlavrSavr tomato), most GE crops planted in the United States have irst-generation traits. All three generations of GE
3crop traits are in various stages of research and development.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 2 • Views: 777 • Replies: 6
No top replies

 
View best answer, chosen by oristarA
Setanta
  Selected Answer
 
  2  
Reply Mon 17 Mar, 2014 11:03 am
No, it means that crops could be genetically engineered to produce chemical compounds which could be used in pharmaceutical products, rather than being genetically engineered to produce food or fiber (rice, cotton, etc.)
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Mar, 2014 08:17 pm
@Setanta,
Thanks.
Does "beyong" mean "far better" there?
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Mar, 2014 03:41 am
@oristarA,
First, the word is beyond. In this case, it simply means "other than," although it implies that this is important innovation. Whether or not that is better is a value judgment, and there is a large sector of the public who are opposed to the use of genetically "engineered" crops. This segment usually uses the term GM--genetically modified--and i suspect that GE is being used here because it is a less controversial term.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Mar, 2014 05:27 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

First, the word is beyond. In this case, it simply means "other than," although it implies that this is important innovation. Whether or not that is better is a value judgment, and there is a large sector of the public who are opposed to the use of genetically "engineered" crops. This segment usually uses the term GM--genetically modified--and i suspect that GE is being used here because it is a less controversial term.


A large sector of the public goes against GMF? In the United States?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Tue 18 Mar, 2014 10:13 am
It's not just in the United States. The excerpt below is from a blog at The Economist:

Quote:
FACTS can be stubborn - and irritating. It is satisfying—perhaps even gratifying—to accept the idea that genetically modified crops are causing thousands of Indian farmers to commit suicide (as this article claims). The notion seems plausible: farmers take out higher debts on the promise that GM seeds will be a bonanza and then lose everything when the harvest fails. There is genuine distress: farmers are indeed killing themselves. Their cause has been adopted by high-profile campaigners such as Britain’s Prince Charles and India’s Vandana Shiva, who blames the spate of deaths on Monsanto, an American biotech firm. There have been blockbuster films, such as “Summer 2007”; the rural-affairs editor of The Hindu, a newspaper, won an international press award for his writing on the subject. The farmers' deaths played a part in the recommendation by a panel of India's Supreme Court to impose a 10-year moratorium on field trials of GM crops in the country.

There is only one trouble: there has been no spate of suicides. Ian Plewis, of the University of Manchester, in Britian, has looked at suicide rates in the cotton-growing areas of India, which are usually regarded as among the worst-hit. He finds that the suicide rate among male farmers in the nine main cotton-growing states was just under 30 per 100,000 in 2011. That is about the same as suicide rates among farmers in France and Scotland, so Indian farmers do not seem unusual. The rates are slightly lower than among men in those states who do not work on farms, so Indian cotton farmers are slightly less likely to commit suicide than their non-farming neighbours. Nor is there any sign that suicides rates changed significantly after 2002, when GM cotton began to be introduced. Overall, Indian suicide rates are not especially high. Officially, they are just over 10 per 100,000, slightly more than Germany and less than half China’s, though of course, the official figures might be underestimates.

The idea that GM cotton drives farmers to suicide has become received wisdom. But it is wrong.


I just did a simple web search for "GM foods" and came up with that, as well as others, such as: "Bio-Tech Propaganda: “GMO Food is Good for Your Health," from The Guardian there is an article entitled "GM crops: are they safe to grow and eat," and many, many others. It has become one of those obsessional things that divide people deeply. There is the case of golden rice, which seeks to provide a reliable source of beta-carotene so that people can get the vitamin A that they need. The anti-GM warriors have ranted about this for years, even though the intent is benign, and the developers were trying to solve a serious nutritional defect in many peoples' diets. In this Wikipedia article on golden rice, read the section on controversy.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Mar, 2014 03:48 pm
@Setanta,
Signature
Real life . . . no, there's no app for that. -- Setanta, March, 2014
-------------

Real conceit . . . no, there's no app for that either.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The third generation of GE crops would include traits to allow production of pharmaceuticals...?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/02/2024 at 06:24:14