24
   

Congratulations, House Republicans!

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 11:39 am
@Baldimo,
Baldimo doesn't even understand US government.

From Wiki.
Quote:
111th United States Congress
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


President Obama signing the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010 into law, January 2, 2011.
The One Hundred Eleventh United States Congress was the meeting of the legislative branch of the United States federal government from January 3, 2009, until January 3, 2011. It began during the last two weeks of the George W. Bush administration, with the remainder spanning the first two years of Barack Obama's presidency. It was composed of the Senate and the House of Representatives. The apportionment of seats in the House was based on the 2000 U.S. Census. In the November 4, 2008 elections, the Democratic Party increased its majorities in both chambers, giving President Obama a Democratic majority in the legislature for the first two years of his presidency. A new delegate seat was created for the Northern Mariana Islands.[5] This Congress has been considered one of the most "productive" Congresses in history in terms of legislation being passed since Lyndon Johnson's era of the "Great Society" (in the 89th Congress).[6][7][8][9]
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 11:40 am
@parados,
Quote:
You just want to attack a black President every chance you get.


That is a lie. It has nothing to do with his color. If you wish to be a race baiter that is your choice.
parados
 
  2  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 11:41 am
@coldjoint,
So you are going to claim it is just political party then that you put in front of country. OK.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 11:44 am
@parados,
Quote:
just political party then that you put in front of country.


Now you got it. That is exactly what the fuckface(no matter what color)in chief did. And has been caught for doing it.
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 11:49 am
@cicerone imposter,
When did Nancy Pelosi become Speaker of the House? The answer is 2007. In order to become the Speaker of the House, you have to be a member of the MAJORITY party. Nancy Pelosi was SOH for the 11oth and 111th Congresses.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 11:54 am
@coldjoint,
The Pink Prevaricator wrote:



Now you got it. That is exactly what the fuckface(no matter what color)in chief did. And has been caught for doing it.

ROFLMAO... what nonsense from you. Just more of your idiocy that we see constantly. If reality doesn't work for you, just make stuff up.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 12:42 pm
@parados,
Quote:
what nonsense


It is not nonsense. It is what it appears to be. Obama covering his ass at the expense of the American people, the integrity of the office of president, and the security of the country.
parados
 
  2  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 02:44 pm
@coldjoint,
The Pink Prevaricator wrote:



It is not nonsense. It is what it appears to be. Obama covering his ass at the expense of the American people, the integrity of the office of president, and the security of the country.

It is nonsense because your statement makes absolutely no sense.
How were the American people harmed?
How was the office of the Presidency harmed?
How was the security of the country harmed?

You can provide no evidence to support your idiotic statement. Once again we see you not caring a bit for the country or the Constitution. Instead you throw out unsupported allegations pretending you are a patriot when clearly you don't give a damn about your country.

If you cared about your country then it wouldn't be about Obama but about every instance of a President doing what you claim you hate.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 02:53 pm
@parados,
Quote:
It is nonsense because your statement makes absolutely no sense.
How were the American people harmed?
How was the office of the Presidency harmed?
How was the security of the country harmed?


You even trying to justify this kind of conduct says you do not care how power is defined. The Constitution defined it. And how power is abused is open to interpretation.
And your interpretation sucks.
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 02:54 pm
@coldjoint,
Says the peepee in pink
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 02:57 pm
@parados,
Quote:
then it wouldn't be about Obama but about every instance of a President doing what you claim you hate.


This president is in office. He clearly shouldn't be.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 02:58 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
Says the peepee in pink


Are the trolls hungry?
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 02:58 pm
@parados,
ice brain wrote,
Quote:
the integrity of the office of president, and the security of the country.


What security breach did the US have?

The GOP cut consular security funding, and they complain because the military couldn't respond in time. TNCFS
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 03:01 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
What security breach did the US have?


Dealing with Al Qaeda is one.
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 03:14 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Why didn't the state dept reroute funding? They had $70,000 to make a PR campaign designed to distance the US govt from a video, but nothing to increase security?
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 03:23 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Are the trolls hungry?

Whendid you last eat?
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 04:51 pm
@coldjoint,
Al Quida's breach into the US was under GW Bush, and he was warned. You don't have any memory or any factual information. Why do you bother posting? It only makes you look more stupid with every post.
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 04:54 pm
Finally A Benghazi Scandal With Legs--Sen Graham Coordinated With Lara Logan On Benghazi Smear Piece

Last edited Mon May 5, 2014, 08:22 PM - Edit history (1)
Ruh-roh - looks like Sen. Lindsey "DuBois" Graham may have coordinated illegally with the awful Lara Logan on her Benghazi smear piece. From Media Matters:

While the walls were collapsing around Lara Logan at CBS News last year in the wake of her bungled Benghazi report on 60 Minutes, and as more and more holes appeared in her poorly-sourced report about the terror attack, the foreign correspondent reached out to a Republican senator and fierce White House critic for advice and counsel.

The partisan move, in which Logan solicited help from Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) -- who's been professionally committed to pushing the tale of a White House cover-up surrounding the September 11, 2012 terror attacks -- suggests Logan viewed both Benghazi and her spin control mission through a political prism.

Indeed, Logan even met several times with Graham while preparing the initial Benghazi story, according to a new report in New York magazine. The senator did not appear in the 60 Minutes report but when the report aired he immediately took to the television airwaves to tout it as a "death blow" to the Obama administration's telling of the Benghazi attacks and their response to it. In retrospect, this looks suspiciously like coordination: Graham helped shape the Benghazi story with an anti-White House angle and then forcefully cheerled it, even announcing he'd block every White House appointee until he got answers about Benghazi. Once trouble erupted, the senator was naturally there for Logan when she called for help.



http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/05/05/cbs-still-wont-come-clean-about-lara-logan-and/199164
http://nymag.com/news/features/lara-logan-cbs-news-2014-5/
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/05/05/1297109/-Lindsey-Graham-Gave-Advice-and-Counsel-to-Lara-Logan-on-her-Debunked-60-Minutes-Benghazi-Report


Meanwhile, CBS is still dodging the question about partisan politics and how much of a driving force it might have been in Logan's report. The New York article notes that not only did Logan seek counsel from Graham, but that she had a history of producing "the kind of stories that kept 60 Minutes immune to criticism from the right."

Recall that one of the key conclusions from the panel review of the Bush story was that political bias did not play a role in how the controversial 2004 story was put together. For the Benghazi story, it's impossible to know if CBS was equally free of prejudice because there hasn't been an independent assessment of the reporting process.

Which brings us right back to the central question from 2013: What is CBS hiding about Lara Logan?


http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/05/05/cbs-still-wont-come-clean-about-lara-logan-and/199164


UPDATE:
CBS News Asked Nexis To Delete Transcript Of Discredited Benghazi Report
http://thinkprogress.org/world/2014/05/05/3434036/cbs-news-lexis-lara-logan-benghazi/
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 05:01 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:

Re: bobsal u1553115 (Post 5656197)
The job numbers are not improving.


Actually, they are getting better, not anywhere fast enough. Why do you suppose the GOP has never, ever once offered up any sort of job bills? The only time "trickle down" even kinda worked was during Clinton's administration but he actually taxed the wealthy. The middle class grew and welfare numbers crashed.

What the hell is wrong with you? Eight years of W got us here. Why do you want to continue those fucked up times?
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 05:03 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Maybe you can take some of the Death Row inmates off the taxpayers dime and put them up at your place. There should be no pity for monsters.


Right of the bat - release all the pot heads and take prisons out of the hands of private companies.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/29/2024 at 11:05:19