24
   

Congratulations, House Republicans!

 
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 11:20 am
@parados,
Quote:
You clearly hate your country since you feel the courts have no say in legality.


And Obama feels any differently when he selects laws to enforce and not enforce? Looks like Barry is a "hater."http://www.acidpulse.us/images/smilies/chuckle.gif
parados
 
  2  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 11:37 am
@coldjoint,
The Pink Prevaricator wrote:

Quote:
You clearly hate your country since you feel the courts have no say in legality.


And Obama feels any differently when he selects laws to enforce and not enforce? Looks like Barry is a "hater."http://www.acidpulse.us/images/smilies/chuckle.gif

Gosh **** for brains, unless you give any President an unlimited budget they can't enforce every law. Even a grade schooler should know that. Since you feel the government takes too much money from you already you clearly feel he shouldn't enforce every law. Clearly the **** you have for brains has created an inability for you to even think properly.

You can't have it both ways, **** for brains. Either you want to spend the money to enforce the laws or you don't want to spend the money. Your spastic bi polar arguments show you can't think at all.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 11:40 am
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
You clearly hate your country since you feel the courts have no say in legality.


And Obama feels any differently when he selects laws to enforce and not enforce? Looks like Barry is a "hater."http://www.acidpulse.us/images/smilies/chuckle.gif


By the way, **** for brains. Obama is following court rulings since they have ruled on several occasions that budget restrictions mean no one can enforce every law at all times.

So, again, we see that you and your **** for brains hates your country since you again ignore what the courts have ruled.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 01:50 pm
@parados,
Quote:
So, again, we see that you and your **** for brains hates your country since you again ignore what the courts have ruled.


And your point? I see Obama as a threat to liberty. And again I am not the only one. There are far too many circumstantial events or scandals that reveal his agenda. And accusing me of hating the country does not change what Obama is doing.

Another charming bit of irrelevancy from you.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 01:55 pm
@coldjoint,
You,
Quote:
I see Obama as a threat to liberty.


Tell us how Obama is a threat to our liberty?
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 02:00 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Tell us how Obama is a threat to our liberty?


You have a hard time paying attention, don' t you.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 02:43 pm
@coldjoint,
This isn't about attention spans; it's about facts and your inability to answer straight questions.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 03:22 pm
@coldjoint,
The Pink Prevaricator wrote:

Quote:
So, again, we see that you and your **** for brains hates your country since you again ignore what the courts have ruled.


And your point? I see Obama as a threat to liberty. And again I am not the only one.
Paranoia isn't confined to one person. Wow. Is that supposed to be a huge revelation? People that can't think for themselves tend to group together in fear. It's been that way since we lived in caves. What you see isn't reality anymore than those idiots that claimed Bush was going to cancel the elections were seeing reality.

The Pink Prevaricator wrote:


There are far too many circumstantial events or scandals that reveal his agenda. And accusing me of hating the country does not change what Obama is doing.

Another charming bit of irrelevancy from you.

The only irrelevancy is your claim of scandals and circumstantial events that require huge leaps of irrational logic to get where you are. I tell you what, Pinkie, give us your top 3 things you think Obama will do that threaten your freedom then you and I can find someone in Vegas to hold the bet and we can bet on whether it happens or not.

Make it $100,000 and you can make easy money if you really believe the **** you post here. Of course, you will either pull way back on your claims or you won't make the bet because you realize how stupid you are acting.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 09:16 pm
@parados,
Quote:
huge leaps of irrational logic to get where you are.


Is that like the huge leap not to reveal evidence by using executive privilege? Or the huge leap to withhold e-mails? Or like the huge leap to blame a video instead of losing an election?
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 09:20 pm
@parados,
Quote:
you will either pull way back on your claims

What? Not a chance in Hell. You keep reading. It will only get worse. Obama is unraveling and the liberals know it.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 09:54 pm
@coldjoint,
You wrote,
Quote:
Obama is unraveling and the liberals know it.


Tell us where you got this information? Please provide a credible source.
Your opinion is worth shyt like you!

From Huff Post.
Quote:
The Five Strands of Conservatism: Why the GOP is Unraveling
Read More: Conservatives, Gop, Republican Party, Republicans, Tax Day Tea Parties, Tea Parties, Politics News
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 10:20 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Please provide a credible source.


Reality is credible. Obama is not. Nor is the Huff Post, credible.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 10:40 pm
Unfortunately, joint, you have virtually no contact with reality. Nor do your cites.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 10:51 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Unfortunately, joint, you have virtually no contact with reality. Nor do your cites.


That would be sites. And why are your sources from proven liars like Obama, and his minions, any better?

coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 10:58 pm
Quote:
Is Obama Lying About Obamacare Numbers?
Quote:


When does government incompetence turn to government corruption? When the incompetent government officials lie, stonewall, and refuse to obey transparency laws.

And that is exactly what is happening inside the Obama administration in an attempt to cover up an Obamacare blunder that places healthcare consumers in danger of having no coverage at all.

Judicial Watch initiated an investigation of the matter and ran right into an Obama administration stonewall. And on March 27, 2014, JW was forced to file a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Specifically, JW seeks records regarding the testing and oversight of the Obama administration’s error-filled Healthcare.gov “834” reporting forms.

Form 834 is an electronic file sent from HealthCare.gov to an insurance company after a consumer picks a health care coverage plan. The file is supposed to contain the person’s name, address, contact information, Social Security number, and information about the plan they have chosen. Insurance companies use the form to enroll people in insurance plans and bill consumers for their portion of the payment. An inaccurate 834 form may result in consumers either not having coverage, or being turned down for payment claims.

It has been estimated that as many as 33 percent of the 834 forms for enrollees in the federal health care website may have been inaccurate, incomplete, or missing altogether.

Of course, this problem threatens the Obama administration’s narrative that everything is hunky dory with the Obamacare rollout, and that the administration hit all of its goals for the number of Americans covered; hence the cover-up.

Here’s what we’re after:

Any and all documents and communications generated on or after April 1, 2103, regarding the timing and procedures for testing the back end systems that are responsible for ensuring the accuracy of Form 834 transactions on Healthcare.gov;

Any and all documents and communications generated on or after April 1, 2013, regarding reports of instances or potential instances of inaccuracies, discrepancies, and/or missing information in Form 834 transactions;

Any and all documents and communications generated on or after April 1, 2013, regarding the establishment and operation of an official mechanism to report and/or remedy instances of inaccuracies, discrepancies, and/or missing information in Form 834 transactions.

In a December 2, 2013, article entitled “Health-care enrollment on Web plagued by bugs,” the Washington Post reported: “The enrollment records for a significant portion of the Americans who have chosen health plans through the online federal insurance marketplace contain errors — generated by the computer system — that mean they might not get the coverage they’re expecting next month.” Also, the Form 834 problems “have affected roughly one-third of the people who have signed up for health plans since Oct. 1.”

Though the administration has refused to reveal how many consumers have been affected by the Form 834 failures, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services spokesperson Julie Bataille admitted in early December that it is a major problem, being worked on by “a team of experts from CMS, key outside contractors working closely with health plan representatives and overseen by CMS’s general contractor, Optum/QSSI.”

At a December 5 press briefing White House Press Secretary Jay Carney described the costly Form 834 failures as “self-inflicted problems,” adding, “We know every person who has enrolled, or believes he or she has enrolled, we – the CMS and others, and every one of them is being contacted …”

None of this is reassuring.

The Obama administration has been playing games with the enrollment numbers from the very beginning. And it speaks volumes that the Obama administration doesn’t want to give us information about whether those who want insurance were actually able to get it through Healthcare.gov.

Given HHS’s unlawful cover up, it is fair to presume that President Obama’s touted figure of eight million Obamacare enrollments is a knowing fiction. With all its illegal stonewalling of basic information, we frankly can’t believe much of anything this administration has to say on what Obamacare is doing to the American people.


http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/weekly-update-obama-lying-obamacare-numbers/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=tweet&utm_campaign=042514

There you have it. If the numbers were good we would see them. It would be a refreshing change to see the idiot back up with he says.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 11:00 pm
No. It's cites, as in the people you cite. Though, now that you mention it, the sites your cites post on have virtually no credibility either. You fail either way. As do they.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 11:04 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
No. It's cites, as in the people you cite.


You just can't help lying, can you?
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 11:23 pm
I'm correct. You're wrong. " Just the facts, ma'am".
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 11:28 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
I'm correct. You're wrong.


The progressive and liberal answer to anything. Not working any longer. People are demanding accountability and every time the Obama administration skates it shows they have no intention of changing the corruption, thuggery, and agenda now famous around the world as a colossal failure.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Fri 25 Apr, 2014 11:31 pm
What part of "It's been fixed" do you find hard to understand, joint? JW is citing problems from early December and before. No one is denying there were problems then (due to a notorious fuckup by the private industry whose alleged virtues you extol endlessly). But they were fixed. That includes the counters in the software. Except for the bloviators who find their case against Obama evaporating before their eyes, the numbers aren't in serious question. Not by anyone who knows numbers, at least.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 05/01/2024 at 08:51:16