24
   

Congratulations, House Republicans!

 
 
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2014 11:30 am
coldjoint says:
Quote:
That is simply not true. Progressives are the anti Semites. And Obama is just another Hitler, the only difference is Obamas race card has not killed people, yet.


Do you get this sick bullshit out of your own imagination, or are you quoting some other sicko?
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2014 11:34 am
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Do you get this sick bullshit out of your own imagination, or are you quoting some other sicko?


You are the one that bought Hitler up. But of course your comparison is not sick because you think your narrative controls things and therefore you have license to compare people to insane killers. Wrong again.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2014 11:43 am
Quote:
Alinsky’s 12 Rules for Radicals
Know them and know what Democrats are doing!
Quote:


* RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)

* RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)

* RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

* RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

* RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)
[/u]
* RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)

* RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)

* RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)

* RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)

* RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)

* RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)

* RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)


Very informative

http://www.varight.com/alinskys-12-rules-for-radicals/.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2014 11:43 am
coldjoint says:
Quote:
You are the one that bought Hitler up. But of course your comparison is not sick because you think your narrative controls things and therefore you have license to compare people to insane killers. Wrong again.


FAIL. Wasn't me. I didn't. I was simply reacting to your insanely wrong characterization of progressives.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2014 12:10 pm
@MontereyJack,
He gets all his bull shyt from Fox News, and parrots them as if they are factual.

He's brain dead; doesn't know how to search for the truth; parrots repeat whatever is told them.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2014 12:25 pm
@coldjoint,
You do realize, don't you, coldjoint, that the Tea Party's major organizing guru has been Saul Alinsky (through his writing, of course, since he's dead)? Guess that makes them all Commie, pinko, liberal, progressives, doesn't it?
Quote:
Former Republican House Majority Leader Dick Armey also gives copies of Alinsky's book Rules for Radicals to Tea Party leaders


Just one example

They follow his rules with great gusto. They describe him as "amazingly effective".

Bunch of lousy hippie radicals, the Tea Party.
RABEL222
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2014 12:36 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Rush is in the hospital so he had that english idiot on his program explaining to the brain dead listeners how much better the english political system is than the U S of A system. I almost broke my leg tripping over funiture in an attempt to get to the radio before it affected me. I sure as hell dont want to be identified as a conservative Rush listener!
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2014 12:49 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
You do realize, don't you, coldjoint, that the Tea Party's major organizing guru has been Saul Alinsky (through his writing, of course, since he's dead)? Guess that makes them all Commie, pinko, liberal, progressives, doesn't it?

http://www.acidpulse.us/images/smilies/lolol.gif
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2014 12:53 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
FAIL. Wasn't me. I didn't.


Besides you guys LOOOOOVE Hitler. No it wasn't you.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2014 12:54 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
He gets all his bull shyt from Fox News, and parrots them as if they are factual.


80,000 posts of nothing.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2014 01:02 pm
Quote:
Media Matters Wants To Deny Its Employees The Right To Unionize

George Soros is anti-union?

Quote:
Media Matters for America is apparently resisting an effort by Service Employees International Union Local 500 to unionize its staff.

Last week, the union filed a representation petition with the National Labor Relations Board, indicating that the nonprofit media watchdog organization rejected an effort by the union to organize MMFA’s staff through a Card Check election.

http://lonelyconservative.com/2014/04/media-matters-wants-to-deny-its-employees-the-right-to-unionize/
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2014 01:03 pm
@coldjoint,
No. It wasn't me. It was bobsal, you idiot. Just one more in the endless stream of things you get wrong. Maroon.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2014 01:04 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
No. It wasn't me. It was bobsal, you idiot.


Tell me what is the difference between you two? I just don't see any.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2014 01:16 pm
Nice try to redirect and weasel out of your mistake, joint. FAIL again. And speaking of not seeing any differences, I see no real difference between you and the right wing hacks who mindlessly parrot each others false memes. I see no difference between you and FoxNews, who have now gained the legal right to lie, as they were accused of doing.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2014 01:38 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
others false memes.


Better talk to Rex about that.

Quote:
now gained the legal right to lie,


Like Obama did in 2008?
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2014 03:28 pm
@coldjoint,
Nice use of Rule #3, Pinkie. I guess our response would be to not fall for it.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2014 09:06 pm
@parados,
Quote:
Nice use of Rule #3, Pinkie. I guess our response would be to not fall for it.

Your mistake is thinking I can't play by your rules.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 18 Apr, 2014 09:48 pm
T
Quote:
oday Obama signed Ted Cruz’s bill that banned Iran’s terrorist UN Ambassador from coming into the United States, a bill that passed the Senate and the House without a single nay vote. But Obama apparently also issued a signing statement to the new law that said he would take the legislation as guidance, suggesting he may not enforce it.

She talks to J. Christopher Adams about it and plays some footage of Obama that Adams called ‘embarrassingly hypocritical’.

http://therightscoop.com/megyn-kelly-exposes-obamas-embarrassing-hypocrisy-on-something-he-did-today/
Watch the video, again Obama is doing exactly what he said a president doesn't have the authority to do. And this opinion from a Constitutional whiz like Obama.

Having to disregard things he never said he would do? Looks like his lying is pathological.
0 Replies
 
raprap
 
  2  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2014 02:21 am
@coldjoint,
ColdDope wrote:
Your mistake is thinking I can't play by your rules.


Umm, weren't these ColdDoper's rules? That would mean that ColdDope's rules don't apply to ColdDope.....my my my ColdDope must be special...

Did ColdDope ride the short school bus?

Rap
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2014 08:30 am
@coldjoint,
The Pink Prevaricator wrote:

Quote:
Nice use of Rule #3, Pinkie. I guess our response would be to not fall for it.

Your mistake is thinking I can't play by your rules.

You are playing by Alinsky's rules. I am merely pointing it out.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 04:41:40