Congratulations, House Republicans!

@parados,

Quote:

So now cops only investigate crimes if it goes to court?

Obama lied, that was the post. You are deflecting and refuse to acknowledge his lies. Doesn't change anything. He lied.

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

You are too modest. Your stupidity eclipses my own in any and every way.

1 Reply

@parados,

Facts again. Why are you using facts? CJ wouldn't know a fact with a photo in his hand of it.

1 Reply

Virginia GOP'er says incest is voluntary...
That's why he opposes all abortions, even for incest.

Virginia GOP Candidate: Sometimes Incest Is 'Voluntary'

By karoli April 12, 2014 7:00 am - 35 Comments

Virginia Republican Congressional candidate Bob Marshall argues against abortion exceptions for incest, claiming incest can be voluntary.

Virginia Delegate Bob Marshall strikes again! First his comments about disabled children being some kind of bizarre divine punishment, and now this:

A Virginia Republican currently running for the U.S. House of Representatives believes that incest exceptions in abortion bans are unnecessary because sometimes incest is “voluntary,” accord to a report from the Washington Times.

Delegate Bob Marshall has a record of saying absolutely reprehensible things about absolutely everything — and he has the voting record to match.

Here is the exact quote. First said in a 1989 interview, he confirmed that he stands by this belief today:

“What if incest is voluntary?” Mr. Marshall said. “Sometimes it is.”

Mr. Marshall confirmed the stance Thursday, but he said the author was missing the point and that the position is based on what is written in law.

“It doesn’t make it right or legal,” he said. “It just gives the facts.”

So Marshall says incest exceptions for abortions shouldn't be written into the law because sometimes incest is 'voluntary', but on the other hand, he wants to say it's not right or legal?

http://crooksandliars.com/2014/04/virginia-gop-candidate-sometimes-incest

0 Replies

@bobsal u1553115,

Quote:

Your stupidity eclipses my own in any and every way.

Admitting you have a problem? That is a start. Maybe you are just a victim. Yeah that works. Your ridicule is not.

0 Replies

@bobsal u1553115,

Quote:

Facts again.

Parodos uses manipulated numbers and information. A little digging on two of his claims showed they were at best half truths, if not outright and purposeful deception.
Again the narrative you use does not interest me, nor control me.

0 Replies

@coldjoint,

The Pink Prevaricator wrote:

Quote:
So now cops only investigate crimes if it goes to court?

Obama lied, that was the post. You are deflecting and refuse to acknowledge his lies. Doesn't change anything. He lied.

It seems it's you lying. Obama didn't say we have had 100 court cases. Go back and read his statement that you posted. Many investigations don't lead to court cases. You should know that.

By the way.. this is the statement

Quote:

and said his Justice Department has “taken on more than 100 voting rights cases since 2009. ” Cases are investigated before court documents are filed.

No question about it. You are the one lying here, Pinkie.

1 Reply

Quote:

Nancy Pelosi Lies, Calls GOP Racists and Anti-Women

Bob is this who you learned from? The botox queen has a lot of hate, doesn't she? Or is just a lack of any real argument and just the liberal technique of silencing people through intimidation. Either way, the transparency at least in this kind of rhetoric is undeniably a tactic aimed at deflection of the facts and the blatant use of grievance politics.
http://www.independentsentinel.com/nancy-pelosi-lies-calls-gop-racists-and-anti-women/

0 Replies

@bobsal u1553115,

I can't help it, if you guys have to try and bend over backwards to deny the dramatic increase that have happened to my insurance rates since the ACA kicked in. It doesn't fit the narrative of what the ACA was to do for the common American. Instead the answer to my costs is to switch over the very system which caused the increase in my costs in the first place. Yeah great ******* answer. Cause a problem that wasn't there so you can provide an answer that wasn't needed.

They very well could have made changes to the insurance market without the immense effect on the majority of insurance holders. Pre-existing conditions is something everyone agrees with. That could have been done without all the mandates that are driving the costs up.

0 Replies

@parados,

Quote:

No question about it. You are the one lying here, Pinkie.

No, you are just twisting the words to suit your narrative. I can see your agenda in every post. That others agree with you doesn't mean squat.

The fact is that audience believed what he said and the only way to interpret that statement without explanation that you gave(not Obama) is the way it sounds, not how you think it sounds.

3 Replies

http://media.cagle.com/139/2014/04/11/147046_600.jpg

0 Replies

@coldjoint,

Quote:

Re: parados (Post 5633810)
Quote:

No question about it. You are the one lying here, Pinkie.

Parados is right, you know, pinkie.

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

Caught in a lie again ColdDope. Seems that ColdDope lies are becoming easier and easier to expose.

Rap

0 Replies

@coldjoint,

It's you twisting the words. The DOJ took on 100 cases is not the same thing as 100 court cases filed. When a police officer takes on a case it isn't filed with the court.
When the FBI takes on a case it isn't filed with the court. The DoJ investigations are done by the FBI.

Accusing me of doing what you did isn't going to cut it, Pinkie. Anyone can see the words said and see your interpretation. Do you think the case of the Black panthers was investigated and no charges filed? Or do you think the case was not investigated at all?

1 Reply

@bobsal u1553115,

Quote:

Parados is right, you know, pinkie.

Parados is a shill, and you are a sycophant Obamaphile. There is nothing that remotely resembles the whole story and all the facts that comes from either of you.

1 Reply

@parados,

Quote:

Accusing me of doing what you did isn't going to cut it, Pinkie.

Then how about I accuse the fuckface in chief? Like his explanation for the "Lie of 2013". As if that wasn't the same kind of bullshit he is pulling here

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

Backatcha ColdDoper

ColdDoper selconfessed wrote:

ColdDope is a shill, and you are a sycophant Obamaphobic racist. There is nothing that remotely resembles the whole story and all the facts that comes from ColdDope.

Rap

1 Reply

@raprap,

Thanks for valuable input. You add nothing but more ridicule which has proven to be quite ineffective. Carry on minion. I am tired of pulling your strings.

1 Reply

Quote:

If it sounds like I am repeating myself, so be it. My point is that it is not difficult to obtain an ID that qualifies you to vote in our elections. President Obama would like you to believe the Republican Party is after only one thing with the renewed push for voter ID. He tries to tell America the GOP wants to restrict their right to vote. He declares your voting rights are under attack, but nothing could be further from the truth. What we want is simply this. Votes should only be cast by American citizens and those citizens should be allowed to vote only one time in each election. Why is that so hard for the Democrats to grasp?

President Obama is on a roll about civil rights. Earlier this week, he visited Texas to laud the accomplishments of LBJ on that front. He tied his own accomplishments to those of LBJ. It is true that President Johnson helped push the Civil Rights Act through Congress, but there is another part of the civil rights saga that so many Democrats refuse to acknowledge. The KKK was created by southern Democrats. It was also the Democrats who enacted strict voting registration laws that were specifically designed to prevent blacks from voting. It was the Republican Party that led the push to fight those laws and to pass the both the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act.

President Obama is doing his best to establish a narrative he believes will further his agenda and help the Democrats in the mid-term elections. He was successful in doing that in 2012, convincing a great number of Americans that Mitt Romney and the Republican Party was engaged in a war on women. That narrative, as is the narrative that the Republican Party wants to restrict voting rights, was a lie. That fact will not prevent Obama from spreading the word, I am sure. That is one reason why we must continue telling the truth about Obama’s false narratives and the lies he is telling. If that requires me to mock his presidency for the failure it has been, then so be it. Let the mockery begin.

http://www.ldjackson.net/president-obama-more-lies-about-voter-id-and-voting-rights/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
This article shows that attaining a picture ID is easy and free and uses the OK law for an example where exceptions have been made for native Americans, most certainly a minority.
In reality the Democrats are planning to have illegals vote again and again, there is no other explanation. It can't be proven but all this makes it obvious.

1 Reply

Quote:

How much will the Democrats pay for the Obamacare disaster in the upcoming elections?
Not at all
5%
Only a little bit
6%
They will be creamed for what they have done to healthcare
89%

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2014/04/12/true-the-vote-president-calls-cummings-damning-emails-the-tip-of-a-very-ugly-iceberg-112145

0 Replies

Congratulations, House Republicans!

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know