24
   

Congratulations, House Republicans!

 
 
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2014 01:17 pm
Quote:
Nearly one out of every ten Israelis who apply for tourist visas to the United States are denied entry by the U.S. State Department. According to figures posted in Israeli newspaper Yediot Aharonot--in 2013 year of the 125,000 Israelis requested tourist visas to the US, 9.7% were refused. In 2012 that figure was at 5.4%, and as recently as 2007, a mere 2.5% of the requests were denied.

http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2014/03/obamas-state-department-israelis-not.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+YidWithLid+%28YID+With+LID%29
More liberal hate enforced through visa denial.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  4  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2014 02:39 pm
@coldjoint,
The Pink Prevaricator wrote:


Clinton did go to that island. That is a fact. Now what would a guy like him do there?

GW Bush went to Texas. That is clearly a fact.
parados
 
  4  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2014 02:42 pm
@coldjoint,
The Pink Prevaricator wrote:



Why? I believe O'Reily. It is Obama that is the liar.

I think it is YOU that is the liar. You claimed I could access O'Reilly's record. Not only can't I do it but neither can you it seems.

This is what you said and it was clearly a lie.
The Pink Prevaricator wrote:

He( O'Reily) is a Harvard graduate. And you can access his school records unlike the asshole in chief.
Not only was your statement a lie but your name calling of the President reveals the hate you claim doesn't exist in your posts.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2014 02:44 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Frank: In any case, he is serving his second term as president of the United States.

Pretty impressive, in the opinion of most reasonable people.
::::::::::::::

It is nice of you to bring your war criminals and terrorists back for second terms, Frank.

It's very banana republicish of you.



coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2014 05:10 pm
@parados,
Quote:
Not only was your statement a lie but your name calling of the President reveals the hate you claim doesn't exist in your posts.


Calm the **** down Shill. And name calling is not name calling if it is true. Obama is a ******* liar. And it is not hate. I was wondering when you would get around to the lefts favorite slur. You are very predictable and verging on very boring.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2014 05:32 pm
Here is your hate.
Quote:
Democrats Tacitly Concede Their Policies Are Unpopular and Ineffective

Filed under: 2014 Elections

The Democrat Party has chosen an “Emmanuel Goldstein” electoral strategy for 2014: Focus all of their hate and vitriol on two Americans who use their fortune to promote freedom and opportunity, and hope to stir up enough hate to turn out the base; even if they have to lie about it .

In making the Koch Brothers their central issue, Democrats are conceding they have nothing else to run on. Their much touted strategy of making the 2014 election about “income inequality” has fallen flat. Obamacare is an albatross despite their best efforts to spin it. Climate Change and Gun Control are losers for the Democrats. The Republicans, to the dismay of conservatives, have neutralized the “obstructionist” and Amnesty issues by playing ball with the Democrats. There’s still the old reliable “War on Women,” which still works on bitter spinster feminists, but they were going to vote Democrat anyway.

They have to run on hate. They’ve got nothing else, and hate has gotten them this far.


And for Rex.

http://www.gaypatriot.net/2014/03/28/democrats-tacitly-conceded-their-policies-are-unpopular-and-ineffective/
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2014 09:09 pm
@parados,
Quote:
GW Bush went to Texas. That is clearly a fact.


Texas is a state, not a privately owned island. There is no comparison and everyone knows you don't go to a whore house for a haircut. Clinton is a sexual predator and always was one.
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2014 02:03 am
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:
Clinton is a sexual predator and always was one.
I wonder if Hillary agrees with u.
0 Replies
 
revelette2
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2014 05:48 am
@coldjoint,
Quote:
In February, 2.3 million persons were marginally attached to the labor
force, a decline of 285,000 over the year. (The data are not seasonally
adjusted.) These individuals were not in the labor force, wanted and were
available for work, and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12
months. They were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched
for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey. (See table A-16.)

Among the marginally attached, there were 755,000 discouraged workers in
February, down by 130,000 from a year earlier. (The data are not seasonally
adjusted.) Discouraged workers are persons not currently looking for work
because they believe no jobs are available for them. The remaining 1.5
million persons marginally attached to the labor force in February had not
searched for work for reasons such as school attendance or family
responsibilities. (See table A-16.)


source

Emphasis by me.

0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2014 06:48 am
Damn. Spend one day away and the fun starts without me!

http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoons/BagleP/2014/BagleP20140328_low.jpg
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2014 07:37 am
@coldjoint,
The Pink Prevaricator wrote:

Quote:
Not only was your statement a lie but your name calling of the President reveals the hate you claim doesn't exist in your posts.


Calm the **** down Shill. And name calling is not name calling if it is true. Obama is a ******* liar. And it is not hate. I was wondering when you would get around to the lefts favorite slur. You are very predictable and verging on very boring.


It seems you forgot the words you used.
The Pink Prevaricator wrote:
the asshole in chief.

You didn't call him a liar. You used derogatory terms that have no basis in fact.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2014 11:17 am
@parados,
Quote:
You didn't call him a liar. You used derogatory terms that have no basis in fact.


There are enough facts for me. Again, you twist things anyway you wish.
I will say what I wish and the facts show he is a liar. And anyone in that office that does not honor his oath to uphold and protect the Constitution is an ASSHOLE.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2014 11:29 am
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Quote:

Frank: "you now are suggesting the issue is a "moot point.""



coldjoint: "Since he is president I would say it is"


Its moot because you say it is. Well alrighty, then. Thanks for clarifying that.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2014 11:31 am
@JTT,
And won with the biggest margins since Nixon's second election. Bigger than Reagan's and either Bush. Good accomplishment for a President with no support.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2014 11:33 am
@coldjoint,
Why don't you get some education instead of parroting the Fox hell hole of foundationless umbrage?
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2014 11:38 am
@bobsal u1553115,
bobsal u1553115 wrote:

Quote:
Quote:

Frank: "you now are suggesting the issue is a "moot point.""



coldjoint: "Since he is president I would say it is"


Its moot because you say it is. Well alrighty, then. Thanks for clarifying that.


CJ asserted that Harvard had issued a flier stating that Barack Obama was born in Kenya.

A Google of the issue uncovers that Harvard denies ever doing so...and that the "flier" CJ posted was NOT ISSUED by Harvard at all.

Further, the person who did issue the flier has indicated that she simply made some assumptions when she wrote what she did...that the information was not something that Barack Obama told her.

CJ obviously does not have the spine and strength of character to simply acknowledge that he was wrong on this thing...so his default is to, "It is moot."

Gotta wonder why CJ brought it up in the first place...and if it had been true rather than a mistake...whether he would still have considered it "moot."





coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2014 11:38 am
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
Why don't you get some education

What is good for the goose.......
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2014 11:40 am
@bobsal u1553115,
bobsal u1553115 wrote:

Quote:
Quote:

Frank: "you now are suggesting the issue is a "moot point.""



coldjoint: "Since he is president I would say it is"


Its moot because you say it is. Well alrighty, then. Thanks for clarifying that.


CJ asserted that Harvard had issued a flier stating that Barack Obama was born in Kenya.

A Google of the issue uncovers that Harvard denies ever doing so...and that the "flier" CJ posted was NOT ISSUED by Harvard at all.

Further, the person who did issue the flier has indicated that she simply made some assumptions when she wrote what she did...that the information was not something that Barack Obama told her.

CJ obviously does not have the spine and strength of character to simply acknowledge that he was wrong on this thing...so his default is to, "It is moot."

Gotta wonder why CJ brought it up in the first place...and if it had been true rather than a mistake...whether he would still have considered it "moot."




coldjoint
 
  -4  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2014 11:45 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
Gotta wonder why CJ brought it up in the first place.


Got to wonder how mistakes like this happen? But questioning the Messiah Obama is out of the question. You idiots cannot see the amount of doubt all this creates?
And coupled with the destruction of the economy, the non enforcement of immigration laws, the tearing down of the military, and the indoctrination of our youth he should have been born somewhere else. He clearly does not give a good **** about the rule of law, the Constitution or this country. And it looks like you two don't either.
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2014 12:19 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
Gotta wonder why CJ brought it up in the first place.


Got to wonder how mistakes like this happen? But questioning the Messiah Obama is out of the question. You idiots cannot see the amount of doubt all this creates?
And coupled with the destruction of the economy, the non enforcement of immigration laws, the tearing down of the military, and the indoctrination of our youth he should have been born somewhere else. He clearly does not give a good **** about the rule of law, the Constitution or this country. And it looks like you two don't either.



May of may not be. It is very far from "clearly."

But what is certain is that you have not shown the integrity needed to simply acknowledge that you were wrong in what you posted.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/25/2024 at 11:05:25