24
   

Congratulations, House Republicans!

 
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2014 01:59 pm
Teapublicans are NEVER happy and refuse to even acknowledge the record of this President.


G.O.P. Leader: Five Million Forced Back to Work Under Obama
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—In a blistering indictment of the Administration’s economic policies, the chairman of the Republican National Committee has accused President Obama of forcing five million Americans back to work since he took office, in 2009.

“When President Obama took office, there were five million Americans at home all day who are now, sadly, not at home,” said Reince Priebus, on Sunday’s edition of “Meet the Press.” “They have to go to work five days a week and they’re mad as hell about it.”

He said that he expected G.O.P. candidates in the midterm elections to hammer away at the President’s greatest vulnerability, which he called “the ugly side of employment.”

“You don’t take five million Americans, uproot them from their families, and make them leave their homes for eight hours a day,” Priebus said. “This isn’t a dictatorship. This is America.”
..snip..

http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/g-o-p-leader-five-million-forced-back-work-obama
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2014 02:03 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I never got my check CI. Does that mean my insurance company wasn't screwing people? In fact I don't know anyone who got a check from their insurance companies. Did you get one or did anyone else here on A2K get one?
One Eyed Mind
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2014 02:07 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Under ACA; ACA that.

You act like you know something more than someone who actually uses it. That makes you a complete idiot. The only reason why you continue to regurgitate these lies is because you don't know how to listen to yourself; you let others teach you, when they are irrefutably just as idiotic as you are, hence why wise men don't listen to your men - did it ever occur to you there's a reason why wise men don't **** around with your facetious games? Did it?
parados
 
  3  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2014 02:12 pm
@georgeob1,
Illogical connections and inferences? So tell me what is the value of Michigan goods in Florida if there is no way to transport them there? Is the value the same as if there were roads? You are simply discounting the benefits of transportation on goods and services when it is a very necessary part of doing business. What would be the cost of goods from China if we had to move them over by row boat? Roads are hardly a zero impact on the cost of goods.
parados
 
  3  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2014 02:13 pm
@Baldimo,
You are insured through your employer, are you not? Your employer got the check.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  4  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2014 02:16 pm
@One Eyed Mind,
I never claimed to know more than anyone who uses it, but the media has been a pretty reliable source of information on ACA. I think it was about 70 years ago when I started to learn to read. It's stuck with me ever since, and during that time I have learned to comprehend most of what I read - in English (and some Japanese).

OmSigDAVID
 
  3  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2014 02:18 pm
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:
I never got my check CI. Does that mean my insurance company wasn't screwing people?
In fact I don't know anyone who got a check from their insurance companies.
Did you get one or did anyone else here on A2K get one?
Over the years, decades & centuries,
I have gotten some checks from some insurance companies, for different reasons.





David
One Eyed Mind
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2014 02:20 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Wise men didn't learn from the media.

Did that ever cross your mind? No, because you're too busy sucking semen out of social teats.

Well, I guess you can't spell saliferous without life, am I right?
cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2014 02:26 pm
@One Eyed Mind,
Wise men learn from all resources.
One Eyed Mind
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2014 02:40 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Name one wise men that voiced the same sources you're voicing.

You can't, can you?
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2014 02:46 pm
@One Eyed Mind,
No, because what I opined is true and doesn't require support from anyone else. Truth doesn't require outside verification; it speaks for itself. Besides that, 'wise men' is an oxymoron.
One Eyed Mind
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2014 02:48 pm
@cicerone imposter,
See? You can't provide anything.

You either A. Insult or B. Excuse

You have 0% characteristics of a wise man.
Miller
 
  0  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2014 03:00 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

Baldimo wrote:
I never got my check CI. Does that mean my insurance company wasn't screwing people?
In fact I don't know anyone who got a check from their insurance companies.
Did you get one or did anyone else here on A2K get one?
Over the years, decades & centuries,
I have gotten some checks from some insurance companies, for different reasons.

David


My Poodles Health Insurance always sends me a check. I also have received checks from Insurance companies in Chicago and Boston.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  4  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2014 04:12 pm
@One Eyed Mind,
I never claimed I was wise. I don't even know the 'characteristics of a wise man.'
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  2  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2014 04:26 pm
@parados,
parados wrote:

Illogical connections and inferences? So tell me what is the value of Michigan goods in Florida if there is no way to transport them there? Is the value the same as if there were roads? You are simply discounting the benefits of transportation on goods and services when it is a very necessary part of doing business. What would be the cost of goods from China if we had to move them over by row boat? Roads are hardly a zero impact on the cost of goods.


That is not a sufficient explanation for the economic absurdities you are persistently advocating. I have come to the conclusion that you are a good deal more adept in finding stuff on the web than in actually understanding the subject matter you spout off about so assiduously.

No one is asserting that roads are not important or even valuable. You are merely throwing some gorilla dust in the air to deflect attention from your errors and misstatements.
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Oct, 2014 12:35 am
51,000 jobs that Corbett bragged about on State jobs website are not in Pa.

http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/harrisburg_politics/State-employment-website-lists-thousands-of-foreign-jobs.html#Mlp3iJthIZQoV1yS.99

In a debate with Tom Wolf, Corbett said the job market in PA is just great. To prove it, he pointed to the official State government jobs website, which lists "250,000 jobs."

Well, it turns out 51,389 of those jobs are not even in PA. Many are not even close - including jobs in Taiwan, Mexico and Iraq.

"Sure, we know the job market is tough here, but if you are going to vote Democratic, why don't you move to northern Iraq. I hear the nighttime skies are beautiful there this time of year."

It was previously noted that many of the jobs listed on that state jobs website involved prostitution. Here's that link:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10746100
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  0  
Reply Tue 7 Oct, 2014 02:10 am
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:


He's a self-made man of gross ignorance even as he believes he understands the environment in which he lives.

He opines about our economy, but when asked where he studied Economics..


CI: Stop writing( this sh!t about yourself. Turn off the lights, take your meds, and go to bed like a good boy.

Based on your knowledge level (!), I'm surprised you ever made it out of the 1st grade! (:

One other thing, I suspect you're copying other author's works and calling them your own, because within the context of this/and other several thread(s), they make no sense at all. Admit it...you're a morbid cheat...
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Tue 7 Oct, 2014 08:33 am
@georgeob1,
Quote:
That is not a sufficient explanation for the economic absurdities you are persistently advocating.

ROFLMAO..... So, you have decided to just pretend I do something while not arguing against specifics.

You have yet to provide a single government program that creates no jobs.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 7 Oct, 2014 10:01 am
@parados,
Quote:
You have yet to provide a single government program that creates no jobs.

Shill, shill, shill.
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Tue 7 Oct, 2014 12:35 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
You have yet to provide a single government program that creates no jobs.

Shill, shill, shill.


But Parados is correct. You have yet to provide a single government program that creates no jobs.

Why don't you do so...and prove him wrong? (I think I know why; I suspect Parados knows why...and I am almost certain you know why!)
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 06/22/2025 at 04:30:21