@JTT,
JTT wrote:
Quote:
He accused the United States, not a member of the assembly, of adopting double standards, after bombing Belgrade in the 1990s and invading Iraq. "It [the US] doesn't have a moral right to comment on our behaviour," Pushkov said.
He is of course, completely correct, isn't he, Walter? If more people had been honest and had spoken truth to power, this whole affair wouldn't have happened.
Why should Russia accept being continually marginalized? Why should they accept US missiles and bases on their doorstep ?
You are avoiding the more obvious question - given that Russians and Europeans are ethnically different, and that is the root cause of the two groups being alienated from each other (Russians are Eurasians; Europeans are descended from the Germanic tribes mixing with the Norse), why shouldn't Europe protect itself? U.S. protection should have ended, in my opinion, after Europe rebuilt after WWII. The fact that they supposedly acquiesced to U.S. protection might just show that Europe will take, but pretend that they owe no gratitude. It's the old joke of the person that comes to one's house for dinner, eats and eats, and then belches before leaving without a thank you.
Perhaps, before condemning the U.S., one should analyze if the U.S. has a friendship with a not so wealthy cousin (Europe) that enjoys getting benefits from the richer side of the family. The U.S. might be the exploited party. Based on the atrocities of WWII, Europeans are no angels, in my opinion. Quite self-absorbed too, in my opinion. Oh yes, and their hubris about their culture is nauseating to some, in my opinion.