@Lash,
Lash wrote:This is the "reset" action Obama took that erased Bush's attempt to keep Putin in line.
Excerpt -
Many Poles and Czechs supported entry into the Western alliance eagerly, indeed passionately, as the guarantee that they would never again lose their independence to Germans, Russians, or anyone else. Because they cherish their American security ties as the key to their countries' future safety and freedom, the leaders of Poland and the Czech Republic aimed to strengthen those ties through their
missile-defense agreements with the United States.
Obama, however, apparently decided that those agreements were less important than the goodwill he might buy with Russia by
cancelling them. Maintaining solidarity with allies that look to America as the leader of the free world has never been an Obama administration priority.
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/10/16/how_the_russian_reset_explains_obama_s_foreign_policy
I can't get over how ridiculous the article quoted by Lash is. Overblown rhetoric aside, it's full of completely misleading information. It may play well with the Tea Party faithful, but it would get short shrift anywhere else. Admittedly the Poles and the Czechs don't like the Russians very much, but it doesn't follow that they even like Americans let alone "cherish" their security ties. As far as a lot of them are concerned the West hung them out to dry after WW2. That feeling is even stronger in the Czech Republic; we, (the British) may have left the Poles to the Soviets, but at least we went to war over Poland. The Czechs were handed over to the Nazis in the last great act of appeasement, and they remember it.
Quote:Maintaining solidarity with allies that look to America as the leader of the free world has never been an Obama administration priority.
This has to be the most ridiculous comment in the whole excerpt. What did Bush do to maintain solidarity? Over Iran, he declared you're with us or against us, rode roughshod over international law, refused to give UN weapons inspector Hans Blix the time he needed. He demonised the French, (Freedom Fries) and his bullying manner not only increased anti Americanism throughout Europe and most of the world, it made it almost obligatory.
As for Mitt Romney, his visit to the UK as part of his presidential campaign will be remembered for one thing only, his slagging off the London Olympics. With a few short words he went from being someone nobody had ever heard, of to being hated with a passion.
Conservative prime minister David Cameron expressed relief when Romney did not get in.
Obama is still very popular over here, mostly because he's not Bush. If Obama had spent his entire presidency jacking off on chat roulette, he'd still be more popular than Bush. You fail to realise how much damage Bush did to America's reputation/standing, it's going to take a lot more than two terms of a decent president like Obama to fix it. Maybe if Hilary does two terms, and then another Democrat gets in for two terms your reputation/standing may be back to where it was during Clinton's presidency, but even that's still asking a great deal.