0
   

The present is eternity..

 
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 May, 2004 06:30 pm
Not at all, Shepaints. I like your back stroke. I also like the notion that, with respect to evolution, our collective change is within us.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 May, 2004 07:24 pm
Let me qualify that. Change itself is inherent to us, i.e., mutation. We will change no matter what. But the way we change, the "direction" change takes has to do with (adaptive) interactions between spontaneous mutations and external conditions (viz. natural selection). Farmerman can check me out on that.
0 Replies
 
satt fs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 May, 2004 08:54 pm
Re: The present is eternity..
Cyracuz wrote:
It is my opinion that time does not move in a linear fashion. In fact it does not move at all. The present is always. It's inescapable. But it does not alter, this present. It never turns into future, and it never becomes past. In this way the present is eternal. We, and by we I mean evolution, move through this present, constantly altering, constantly reverberating, our hopes and memories expanding. We call it time, but it is not. It is change, and it is within us.

I feel I have particular instances of time which chronologically belong to the past but are directly connected with the present, that is, those instances are eternal.
0 Replies
 
shepaints
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 May, 2004 08:58 pm
...to try and connect this thread to art...i have
just viewed an exhibition and read the words
of an abstract artist whose name now escapes me, " I always paint the same thing, its just the feelings and impressions that change".....Is this anyway connected to "the present is eternity?".....Well, it is, ..........for me.....

glug, gurgle, splish, splash!
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 May, 2004 09:23 pm
For me, Cyracuz has pretty much summed it up, in Satt_F's quote above.
0 Replies
 
BoGoWo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 May, 2004 11:15 pm
shepaints wrote:
Cyracuz said "In this way the present is eternal. We, and by we I mean evolution, move through this present, constantly altering, constantly reverberating, our hopes and memories expanding. We call it time, but it is not. It is change, and it is within us.".................


Evolution is a decidedly 'static' phenomenon more like an 'extreme' snail in 'almost' motion; for a change to be induced by the evolutionary process takes eons.

"We call it time, but it is not. It is" - relationships.

shepaints wrote:
........JL said, "Yet the pond is always changing, with waves and movements of the water. It is not static, there is change in the present but there is not movement from past to future, just a dynamic eternal Now>"

The kaleidesope is the same sort of image.... change in the present, every facet of the universe is constantly changing....every component of the kaleidescope is constantly changing.........


The present 'is'; and while there are 'ripples' in the flow of now, it is not so much 'change', but rather the oscillation of relationships swinging like a pendulum - back, and forth.
0 Replies
 
BoGoWo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 May, 2004 11:21 pm
shepaints wrote:
...to try and connect this thread to art...i have
just viewed an exhibition and read the words
of an abstract artist whose name now escapes me, " I always paint the same thing, its just the feelings and impressions that change".....Is this anyway connected to "the present is eternity?".....Well, it is, ..........for me.....

glug, gurgle, splish, splash!


this is the ultimate 'profile' of an artist tying in with my definition of "art" (i.e. 'art' is emotional communication); the artist makes choices, and masters various techniques which make their work 'recognizable'; the variations in his/her work comes from the emotional 'message', which changes with each work.
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 May, 2004 11:31 pm
Yikes! I just read through this thread, and I have a nitpicky point about ego. 'Id' is the Freudian conception of a brain in childlike, me me me addictive behavior. 'Ego' denotes a higher level of evolution, where the soul transgresses these base desires. Super-ego is the truly elevated human being, with no need for anything base at all. Pure intellect, a bit like the Borg.

As for the subject of the thread, I firmly believe in living in 'the moment'. The past and future doesn't really matter. What matters is that you are doing something, preferably positive. It is pure hubris to think that the world will not go on without you. All we can envision about the supposed future are short-term goals. All we can envision about the past are 'should have, could have' negative conundrums. Live in the moment, and ye shall have eternity.
0 Replies
 
BoGoWo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 May, 2004 11:51 pm
cavfancier wrote:
............. Pure intellect, a bit like the Borg.......


only in a 'good' way!

there is a famous quote, frequently dredged up: "those who ignore the past are doomed to repeat it"

i would counter with: those who ignore the 'future' are doomed to miss it!
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 May, 2004 12:06 am
BoGoWo wrote:
cavfancier wrote:
............. Pure intellect, a bit like the Borg.......


only in a 'good' way!

there is a famous quote, frequently dredged up: "those who ignore the past are doomed to repeat it"

i would counter with: those who ignore the 'future' are doomed to miss it!


I might counter with the fact that even visionaries need to focus on the present in order to achieve their goals for the future. Just noticing that the future is in need of growth doesn't affect the day to day work to make it happen.
0 Replies
 
BoGoWo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 May, 2004 08:15 am
the future is "everything"!! Laughing Laughing Laughing Shocked Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 May, 2004 11:23 am
You say that the future is everything, but you can only say it NOW.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 May, 2004 11:31 am
We always hear that all things, including our actions are CAUSED, i.e., determined by antecedent conditions. In effecct, we are PUSHED by the past. BoGoWo seems to be suggesting that all (or much) behavior is motivated by future anticipations, part of what we mean by motivation. In effect, our actions are PULLED by the future, by the anticipated consequences of our present actions. But all that happens NOW.
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 May, 2004 12:00 pm
This post will already be in the past once I hit submit.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 May, 2004 02:03 pm
Right, Cav. I think of the unborn future and dead past as anticipating and remembering in the living present. Actually, they are not really unborn and dead; they are hypothetical.
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 May, 2004 02:09 pm
I think that despite dreams and hopes, our only true reality is the present. It is what drives us towards what we perceive as a future. It is, in fact, all we really know for sure. I pity the weathermen...so much hope, so much defeat.
0 Replies
 
rufio
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 May, 2004 02:27 pm
Past, future, and eternity are all just matters of semantics, really. It is only the present, but it is always changing.
0 Replies
 
twyvel
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 May, 2004 08:01 am
The present doesn't change.
0 Replies
 
BoGoWo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 May, 2004 09:13 am
the 'future' is the result of our every "now".

the 'future' is the product of our ability to imbue our "now"s with a suitable "spin'!
0 Replies
 
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 May, 2004 12:40 pm
Quote:
We always hear that all things, including our actions are CAUSED, i.e., determined by antecedent conditions. In effecct, we are PUSHED by the past. BoGoWo seems to be suggesting that all (or much) behavior is motivated by future anticipations, part of what we mean by motivation. In effect, our actions are PULLED by the future, by the anticipated consequences of our present actions. But all that happens NOW.


Pushed by the past and pulled by the future. Never a moment of peace... Confused

Between haunting past and taunting future
Constantly revolving
Between ghosts we fear and hopes we nurture
The present is dissolving
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 04/27/2024 at 07:50:17