Why do people deny evolution?

he isn't the only source that makes it very clear evolution can't happen

It is ok if you don't understand it.

he isn't the only source that makes it very clear evolution can't happen.

There's a difference, para, between evolution and evolutionary thinking.

As far as I can tell evolutionary thinking as nothing to do with evolution.

I understand it quite well. It's wrong. The author assumes random mutations then uses math that assumes truly random numbers will never pick the same number twice as proof that it can't occur. The birthday paradox proves the author wrong.

He doesn't make it clear that evolution can't happen since his math is incorrect. If someone tells me there are five apples and then uses the expression 2+2=5 as proof there are five, I don't consider them a valid source.

That makes as much sense as saying religious thinking has nothing to do with religion.

vague meaningless statements like "Take your time, it is a process."

What I do see her a lot is people trying to edit a lot of information against evolution ( not only mine), and I understand.

Hence it IS a process, not only an intellectual thing.
So, you don't understand that, yet.

What I do see her a lot is people trying to edit a lot of information against evolution ( not only mine), and I understand.

The only one refusing to discuss your information against evolution is you. When others ask you about it you make stupid statements that have nothing to do with the information. Stupid statements like, "Take your time, it is a process."

The only one that is lying to me is you Q. You claimed you had done research. You can't even discuss the simple statistics. You pretend to know what you don't.

Quote:
Hence it IS a process, not only an intellectual thing.
So, you don't understand that, yet.

Based on your arguments it isn't an intellectual thing at all. I would have to throw all my intellect out the window and simply accept things that are wrong without question to understand what you claim to understand.

Just to illustrate your lack of an intellectual argument and how dishonest you are being, let me ask you again if you think anyone has ever won the lottery? I doubt you will answer it. But it simply illustrates how you must be evasive or your argument falls apart in light of the reality people actually live in.

To me the most amusing deniers are the environmentalist zealots who abuse the Endangered Species Act to inhibit economic development that might benefit Humans t0 "protect" obscure and often poorly define subspecies of wildlife that are themselves headed for natural extinction anyway. This is truly an irony that Darwin himself would appreciate.

A decade ago our government shutdown most logging in the Pacific Northwest to protect a "threatened" subspecies the Spotted Owl. A decade has passed and the Spotted Owl population has continued to decrease,even in the absence of logging, because they are being naturally outcompeted by a very similar and related species o, known as the Brown Owl.

I can understand Quahog ignoring my question cause he has no answers.
His spoon fed information is second and third hand and hes never hd any experience in its development.

Why don't we have elephants in the sediments of the Devonian and why RE THERE NO TRILOBITES IN THE SEDIMENTS OF THE Pleistocene.?

What is your story that all these different, though seemingly related species got here . How did unique reptiles and birds and fish and mammals and plants appear on all the different islands and terrain of
world?

ALL SPECIES ARE HELD CAPTIVE IN THEIR TIME CAPSULE AND ENVIRONMENTAL NICHE. Tell me what argument might you have with that?

Now, it reallly looks like you even don't understand yourself anymore.

How come?

see,- he cannot answer anything so he just tries cute insults. Then he accuses others.