@parados,
Quote:So in other words, your argument about evolution being bad is complete hogswallow.
How can evolution be bad? I have never said evolution is bad. It's a ridiculous idea. As it is that evolution is good.
It is certainly a horrible spectacle though. And sensitive people, especially educated ladies, should not contemplate it. And it should not be rammed down their throats in the name of cod-science.
Ladies know evolution viscerally. They don't need any lessons. It has been deemed necessary by those who deem things that a degree of shame is associated with such knowledge. To tone it down a bit so to speak. Not that it works in every case. History and the Daily News speaks volumes of the cases in which the toning down had no effect. Biology suggests that with no toning down there would be nothing else in the joint to deal with. As there wasn't before the toning down got serious. Freud explains all that.
It is a hoax, and a monumental one, that you can provide ladies with a scientific underpinning to bolster the esteem of their visceral understanding as if no dramatic consequences will naturally follow. Only a hoax if carried out cynically of course. An error otherwise.
I imagine that only a complete fool would project an idiotic understanding of evolution, as if alleles, DNA and the labyrinths of cladistics are of any consequences to divine creatures who have no wish to know about such things and prefer to remain exteriority confections, as if him thinking there are no dramatic consequences in the backdraught is proof that there are none.
Maybe future evolutionists will have to make ladies ashamed of drawing attention to themselves. (See North Korea. Saudi. Uniforms and not even trusting uniforms.) As being impolite and plain bad manners. That might avoid the consequences.
Saps wanted. Although the process takes long enough for our resident saps to be out of the way when the consequences bear fruit and they are content to allow their entire male descendents to enjoy them. Probably a small number by then.
Which is why they steadfastly refuse to discuss consequences. In the hope that nobody will notice with the process being so gradual that this glaring absence, imagine any other policy not concerned with consequences, is easily disguised to the cross-eyed. Try putting it on fast forward.
It's just like spending all the grandkids wages before they are even born. They tell them how much they love them to compensate for the guilt they feel at screwing them and making them pay the debts off. On lower wages and shorter hours too. And more natural disaster caused by the grandkid's sweat having been transformed in advance into atmospheric disturbances.
