Why do people deny evolution?

Still gotta say evolutionists/atheists explaining morality is more fascinating then fossil explanations and interpretations.

Oh yeah . . . explaining "morality" as your magic sky daddy threatening to spank you if you aren't good is much more plausible.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xat1GVnl8-k

If my interpretations of geology and paleo are incorrect, dont tell my clients, they believe all the stuff they get to take to the bank.

My many years old challenge remains unanswered.
LET US SEE SOME EVIDENCE THAT A CREATIONIST/ID WORLDVIEW HAS EVER LED TO ANY MARKETABLE DISCOVERIES (Besides selling bible tracts and model dinosaurs for the gift shops).
i dont think we will be surprised with any geographically based findings or discoveries based on Ctreation/ID "science"

When you have no idea of what you speak, its always good to make up a fall back position.

For your information we can accurately date whole chunks of time stratigraphy, So if you have any idea what age youre talking about I can find you evidence to show what the wolds map looked like at that same time. AND THERE WERE NO TIME PERIODS WHERE THERE WAS ANYTHING LIKE A WORLDWIDE FLOOD.

Yep, you are right. I not only sounds crazy, but its a hell of a Ripping Yarn.

So while you are of making fun of it why don't you see if it fits the evidence?

Kevin Costner's worse performance ever...

Dear Spunky.
Whenever II make a claim, Ive always presented some real world evidence (Check back). Now I think that last request of yours is actually something that you should undertake, not me.

You made the claim, you back it up. Understand how this all works??? You are basically claiming that some magic fairy dust made the world and then destroyed the whole thing.(Something that bears NO EVIDENCE at all). If you are aware of such evidence, Id think youd be proud to present it to defend your argument. Up till now, mosta you guys are asking those of us who see things from an empirical base, to provide evidence for you.
So where is it? what have we missed? Try to be specific .

I always disliked the one where he played the Postman in the post apocalyptic world.
Stupid concept.

I think that mask has been off for a while now

Never saw it. But in Hidden Figures he played a GREAT second role. I was happy to see him playing well again. Everybody should see that movie, and not just for him: the ladies (Monae, Spenser and Henson) keep truckin' throughout.

I will. But Im a great sucker for "Dances with Wolves" apparently all the folks who seem to know more about Lakota stuff, thought the movies sucked.
Im never too crritical about tech stuff unless the story is lame.(like All the Jurassic park sequels)

gotta pick up a load of sheep in Conn. Be back likke Sunday AM.

I'm not qualified to assess the scientific aspects of Hidden Figures, which are all about the advanced math used in calculating orbits. "Figures" in the title is double-entente: the correct numbers that are to be found, and the black women in NASA who computed them, hidden away from view.

But I checked their amazing story, and it pans out.

Don't get too friendly with any of them sheep, and you'll be fine.

typical view. ONly EU and AUstralians view sheep as "partners". We look on them as lunch and coat fibre.
Not that theres anything wrong with your view.

They're very sneaky.

I was just kidding. Of course I would never advise anyone to **** with a sheep. Too small...

I agree with that, but BJ always pretended that he was presenting reasonable and scientifically sound ideas. My little dog has greater scientific literacy than he does.