Why do people deny evolution?

@Briancrc,

Quote:

The irriducible complexity argument has not held. And why should there be flightless birds like the ostrich? Has God foresaken them along with emus, kiwis, and cassowaries?

There ya go!:

Quote:

Editorial Comment: The best comment on the ‘vestigialness’ of ostrich wings comes from a letter to New Scientist by Sibbele Hietkamp, an ostrich farmer in South Africa, who wrote: “Laura Spinney describes ostrich wings as ‘spectacularly de trop’ (17 May, p 42). I have kept ostriches for 18 years and can testify otherwise.” He goes on to describe how ostriches use their wings for many important functions: thermoregulation; providing stability when running and enabling rapid right angle turns; courtship displays and stability while mating; warning signals and other communication; nest building; and providing shade and shelter for young.

(New Scientist letters 21 Jun 2008, p24).

Hence, your argument is by this declared invalid!

1 Reply

You guys are still arguing with this creationist chump? It's a waste of time and energy.

2 Replies

@Quehoniaomath,

Wow. You say you don't have to produce evidence and then in the next post say you provided the evidence you just said you didn't have to produce. You don't seem to have a clue what you are talking about. I asked you for your evidence disputing the evidence presented here that you say is not evidence. You have produced none. You are doing nothing more then claiming something must be true simply because you say it is.

Let me remind you again. You have not presented any evidence.

WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE?

Failure on your part to provide evidence shows you are the troll who has a religious belief that evolution doesn't occur in spite of all facts to the contrary.

1 Reply

@McGentrix,

McGentrix wrote:

You guys are still arguing with this creationist chump? It's a waste of time and energy.

Finally, we actually agree on something.

1 Reply

@McGentrix,

Quote:

You guys are still arguing with this creationist chump? It's a waste of time and energy.

I told you, I am not a creationist. why this then?

chicken? lol

0 Replies

@parados,

it is up to the fundamental-religious-evolutionists.

that you can't understand that is not my fault.

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

Quote:

You guys are still arguing with this creationist chump? It's a waste of time and energy.

Now, how stupid can this be? I am not a creationst and wrote that here a zillion times, but you agree on it? How more morons can you get?

btw do you think I am a creationist because I reject macro evolution?

it is a bit of black white 'thinking' is it not?

against evolution you are automatically a creationst

how bizar this world of evolutionists is.

and can some one tell me why the evolutionists can't think? evolution? lol

what non sense it all is!

0 Replies

@Quehoniaomath,

It is your fault that you deny evidence without refuting it with anything other than your unsupported opinion.

You have made a conclusion without any evidence on your side while simply dismissing all evidence on the other side.

1 Reply

@parados,

Quote:

It is your fault that you deny evidence without refuting it with anything other than your unsupported opinion.

really? lol

Quote:

You have made a conclusion without any evidence on your side while simply dismissing all evidence on the other side.

dismissing evidence? what evidence mate? there is very simply no evidence.

Difficult eh?

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

Not difficult at all.

Evidence you simply stick your fingers in your ears and cover your eyes while yelling you can't see or hear any evidence is easy to come by on this thread.

http://able2know.org/topic/229102-376#post-6064446
You didn't address a single one of the 29.

1 Reply

@parados,

as I recall I adressed one.

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

Your recall is faulty. You simply claimed it wasn't true while providing no supporting evidence to back up your claim. That is not addressing anything in a logical fashion. It is acting in the manner you accuse the other side of acting.

You claim the other side provides no evidence. Then when evidence is presented by the other side you simply claim it isn't evidence. You don't make a logical argument why it isn't evidence. You simply make a claim without any support at all. You are relying on nothing more than you belief. You have no argument. You have no evidence. Your only shtick is to deny anything that is presented here as not being evidence. You might think it makes you look smart but it shows you to be a shallow thinker with no logical arguments about evolution.

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

Quote:

ostriches use their wings for many important functions: thermoregulation; providing stability when running and enabling rapid right angle turns; courtship displays and stability while mating; warning signals and other communication; nest building; and providing shade and shelter for young.

Exactly! The wings evolved to serve different purposes as they are vestigial for flight. And given that you aren't a creationist ( Wink

) I think it's particularly poetic that you pulled your quote from creation research.net LOL

2 Replies

@Briancrc,

Dna must have been relativly conspired to make homo sapiens together with the environment passed and future with the nonlocal theme of consciousness to give it a template or guidance. So that the present has guidance from a future goal as to an out come that has to be by nature. Nature wanted to create homosapiens and conspired to achieve the goal with the environment by relative design. Relativity being nonlocality. So by quantum mechanics all future out comes are explored by relativity and the one that fits closest to a nonlocal theme is chosen.

1 Reply

@martinies,

Relativity uses quantum mechanics to conspire an outcome with a nonlocal template to give guidance and achieve its goal. Relative design by quantumechanics gives the exact right outcome in a co incedents. So in a coincedents of the happening the nonhapping chooses the coarse of the happening events in the event. Relativity and quantum mechanics conspire to bring a coincidence about. The only one coincedents to get actuality that is. Other futures dont get a chance to actualised.

1 Reply

@martinies,

Ok whats the difference between relativity and quantum mechanics the answer is relativity. Relativity is consciousness as difference. Or consciousness is relativity as difference . So qm is the mechanics of relativeness plus or minus consciousness.

0 Replies

@Briancrc,

Quote:

pulled your quote from creation research.net LOL

yes, but it is not reevant because it was posted in SCIENCE!!!

can't you read???????????????????????????????????????????

Now, why did you conveniently ommit that?

Now, comment on that!!!!!!!!!!

0 Replies

@parados,

Quote:

Your recall is faulty.

well, I thought U adressed the embryo hoax, didnt I?

0 Replies

Now, the question remains, why do people still believe in (macro) evolution.

Things that could prove it were hoaxes in the end, but if the theory is right well, then why hoax it? That on it self means a lot.

It , evolution, really looks like a religion. Not only looks, but is.

But better get things straight first, what is the definition of evolution?

2 Replies

http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb192/DinahFyre/anigif_enhanced-5572-1447101973-2.gif

0 Replies

Why do people deny evolution?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know