Why do people deny evolution?

Cool . . . that sucker evolved into an old white guy . . .

1 Reply

@Setanta,

It's really brief, but by Jove, I think that's Frank. Shocked

1 Reply

@FBM,

Still only putting ad hominems out?

2 Replies

@Quehoniaomath,

The question is where is your evidence that all the evidence presented here is not evidence?

Your claim is not supported because you have presented nothing that would dispute the evidence. No research. No science. Nothing but opinion unsupported by anything other than your say so. Your belief which calls on you to discount anything that would dispute that belief as not being evidence would point to your opinion being the religion.

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

Quehoniaomath wrote:

Still only putting ad hominems out?

More like "ad Hominini"

Am I right?! Laughing

0 Replies

@Quehoniaomath,

Quehoniaomath wrote:

Still only putting ad hominems out?

You don't seem to understand what an ad hominem is. FBM didn't say Frank was wrong because he was an old white guy. FBM wasn't even addressing any of Frank's arguments. He was commenting on how Frank looked like someone in a video. Doing that was in no way an attack on Frank and it certainly wasn't an attack on Frank personally to discredit his arguments.

1 Reply

@parados,

You are correct. That was not an ad hom on Frank. I have Frank on Ignore and don't even know what he's been arguing.

1 Reply

@FBM,

FBM wrote:

I have Frank on Ignore and don't even know what he's been arguing.

It all boils down to Agnostics are right, saying there's a god(s) or saying there's no god(s) is just a blind guess.

He was probably saying that when you put him ignore, and if you ever take him off ignore, chances are he'll be saying it then.

2 Replies

@izzythepush,

And Frank, of course, is right. Unless he is wrong.

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

That sounds familiar. IS IT SAFE TO ASSUME THAT HE'S STILL YELLING ALL THE TIME, TOO?

1 Reply

@FBM,

Oh yes, and quoting the post he's responding to in its entirety.

0 Replies

@parados,

I doubt he'll be considering the second possibility.

0 Replies

@parados,

Quote:

The question is where is your evidence that all the evidence presented here is not evidence?

Your claim is not supported because you have presented nothing that would dispute the evidence. No research. No science. Nothing but opinion unsupported by anything other than your say so. Your belief which calls on you to discount anything that would dispute that belief as not being evidence would point to your opinion being the religion.

Evidence? What evidence mate? There is NO evidence at all!

In reality it is the fundamental-religious-evolutionist who clings to his religion.

Ain't that so?

0 Replies

So, the question remains, why do people still cling religiously to evolution, despite the fact that there is not a shred of evidence?

Might it have something to do with being brainwashed at school?

Me thinks so. Otherwise it is very difficult to understand this religiously clinging by those evol's .

And of course there might be an unconcious fear that if evolution is wrong, which it is, people will start wondering about how many other lies there are in their life. Most people can't handle that.

I say, yes, a lot. lot of lies. Including eovlution, that is just bullocks.

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

So you deny that anyone has posted any evidence about transitional fossils on this thread?

You deny that anyone has posted any evidence about evolution of a new species being observed on this thread?

You deny that anyone has posted any evidence about the evolution of DNA on this thread?

1 Reply

@parados,

Quote:

So you deny that anyone has posted any evidence about transitional fossils on this thread?

No, but if you look closer to the 'evidence' it is FALSE.

Diificult eh?

Quote:

You deny that anyone has posted any evidence about evolution of a new species being observed on this thread?

not a specie from another specie,no.

Quote:

You deny that anyone has posted any evidence about the evolution of DNA on this thread?

No, and I have commented on that, mate!
which you, of course, conveniently overlooked.

Now, my question is still standing.

DEFINE evolution.

then we can have a laugh.

1 Reply

I repeat then

So, the question remains, why do people still cling religiously to evolution, despite the fact that there is not a shred of evidence?

0 Replies

@Quehoniaomath,

No. It isn't difficult at all. You are showing us you have no evidence as to why you think it is false. We are back to you making an argument with no evidence.

Let's play the game -

WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE?

1 Reply

@parados,

Quote:

No. It isn't difficult at all. You are showing us you have no evidence as to why you think it is false. We are back to you making an argument with no evidence.

Let's play the game -

WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE?

Oh Ic now it is a game? why are you afraid to be real?

evidence is not up to me but up to the extremely-dumb-fundamental-religious-evolutionists.

they have to deliver the goodies of course, not me.

oh btw it seems you don't get this: hoax are not evidence! Wink

2 Replies

And still waiting for the definition of evolution.

Yawwwwwwwwwwwwn

1 Reply

Why do people deny evolution?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know