Why do people deny evolution?

@Quehoniaomath,

Quehoniaomath wrote:

Quote:
I noticed you didn't answer the question. Please do so.

Please specify your question correctly and precisely. Thank you.

Ok, got it. Just another blind creationist unable to hold an intellectual conversation.

I'd say we are done here.

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

Evidence has been presented here numerous times. You have simply claimed it isn't evidence. It is up to you to provide evidence of why it isn't evidence. You have disputed nothing. You have simply claimed it isn't evidence in spite of the evidence it is evidence.

Please provide your evidence of why it is not evidence. Without any evidence from you, you are doing nothing other than sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling, "I can't hear you!" It doesn't dispute any evidence.

Let me repeat. WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE that no evidence has been presented?

0 Replies

@Briancrc,

crushed?

yep, you ARE funny indeed!

0 Replies

@McGentrix,

Quote:

Ok, got it. Just another blind creationist unable to hold an intellectual conversation.

I'd say we are done here.

yawn, for the zilionist times. I AM NOT A CREATIONIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

stated that numerous times!

and you can't specify the question. that figures then.

Thanks, mate.

Now, about that lack of evidence....

1 Reply

I ask again why can't the fundamentalists-religious-evolutionist-believers deliver the goodies?

why o why?

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

There is no such thing as a fundamentalistbreligionist-evolutionist exvept in your warpedimaginationn. We have produced quantities of evidence o we have. You have ignore it, o you have. Fbm gave you 29 instances of macro evolution. Your ENTIRE attemptes rebuttal was "they're wrong". That was your TOTAL dicussion. No evidence, no discussion from you. You are something less than
redible.

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

Quote:

There is no such thing as a fundamentalistbreligionist-evolutionist exvept in your warpedimaginationn

yep, this whole site is FULL ot these fundamentalistst.

that you can't see that, doesn't change these facts.

But it is ok, it is by no fault of yours.

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

just as I said. Warped imagination.

2 Replies

@MontereyJack,

Its the difference in things which causes evolutional design. Difference is at the root of nature in general. Relativity and quantum mechanics is all about one thing and that is difference. Energy is difference and the common denominator in difference is the neutrality in the original cause of difference which is nonlocality. Nonlocality has presents in changing local difference which dna is.

0 Replies

@MontereyJack,

Quote:

just as I said. Warped imagination.

yes, I agree that the whole of evolution is Waroed Imagination.

But what are you going to to about it?

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

Nice try to redirect, quahog. Doesn't work.

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

Quote:

Nice try to redirect, quahog. Doesn't work.

redirect?

I don't even have too. But I agree that that is what fundamentel-religious-evolutionists do all the time.

Now, I ask again and it seems I have to repeat over and over and over again, but, well, where is the ******* evidence?

2 Replies

@Quehoniaomath,

Quehoniaomath wrote:

Now, about that lack of evidence....

Yes. Let's talk about your lack of evidence. You have presented none, zero, nada, zilch. You simply declare anyone else's evidence to not exist even though it clearly does exist to anyone other than you.

So. Where is your evidence? We see none from you.

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

You want ******* evidence? Here's some ******* evidence. AGAIN. The last ******* time you got this, you ******* ignored it. Ther's 29 ******* points here. That means you ******* well have to coe upbwith 29 sparate discussions and rfutations or be branded a ******* liar. Simply saying "they're wrong!", which is what you did last time, will instantaneously brand you an irretrivable asshole, and that is not n ad hominem UNLESS you rfuse to actual
Y discuss the topic as you always do. Be warned. Talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

You might want to start your 29 (I'll be counting and if you don't come up with 29 you'll be branded a li,ar) discussions with the amply documentes reptile to bird evolution, which destroys your contention that there ar no trasitional fossils and Ogunga's cut and paste screed.

1 Reply

@parados,

Quote:

Yes. Let's talk about your lack of evidence. You have presented none, zero, nada, zilch. You simply declare anyone else's evidence to not exist even though it clearly does exist to anyone other than you.

So. Where is your evidence? We see none from you.

You still are not getting it, or you are trolling.

I don't have to give any evidence, evolutionists have too!

problem is, they don't!

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

Quote:

You want ******* evidence? Here's some ******* evidence. AGAIN. The last ******* time you got this, you ******* ignored it. Ther's 29 ******* points here. That means you ******* well have to coe upbwith 29 sparate discussions and rfutations or be branded a ******* liar. Simply saying "they're wrong!", which is what you did last time, will instantaneously brand you an irretrivable asshole, and that is not n ad hominem UNLESS you rfuse to actual
Y discuss the topic as you always do. Be warned. Talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/

I did adress one issue, but you choose to ignore it.
Now, why should I show it is all false if you ignore it?
why should I do that?

In short, they are all hoaxes. So it is NO EVIDENCE

Difficult, eh?!

0 Replies

@MontereyJack,

No there are still no transitional fossils at all.

you seem to be a bit blinded by your religion called evolution

0 Replies

@gungasnake,

Quote:

Take flying birds for example; suppose you aren't one, and you want to become one. You'll need a baker's dozen highly specialized systems, including wings, flight feathers, the specialized system which allows flight feathers to pivot so as to open on upstrokes and close to trap air on downstrokes (like a venetian blind), a specialized light bone structure, specialized flow-through design heart and lungs, specialized tail, specialized general balance parameters etc.

For starters, every one of these things would be antifunctional until the day on which the whole thing came together, so that the chances of evolving any of these things by any process resembling evolution (mutations plus selection) would amount to an infinitessimal, i.e. one divided by some gigantic number.

The irriducible complexity argument has not held. And why should there be flightless birds like the ostrich? Has God foresaken them along with emus, kiwis, and cassowaries?

2 Replies

@Briancrc,

Quote:

The irriducible complexity argument has not held

really? explain!!.

0 Replies

Why do people deny evolution?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know