132
   

Why do people deny evolution?

 
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 08:49 am
btw it is rather revealing to see how people can take huge nonsense seriously.


seriously Wink
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 09:20 am
@Quehoniaomath,
So you still have no evidence to support your opinion? The mistake you are making is providing no evidence. I guess I will just have to keep asking -

WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE?

Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 09:29 am
@parados,
Quote:
So you still have no evidence to support your opinion? The mistake you are making is providing no evidence. I guess I will just have to keep asking -

WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE?


You still don't get logic. Funny and sad.

evolutionists can't give any evidence, but you don't ask them the same????


The evidence is for he one who does the claim.

well, evolutionist do claim a lot of non sense.

but when I ask fo revidence they can't show any!

why don't you adress that, mate?


FBM
 
  3  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 09:38 am
http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb192/DinahFyre/12065832_10156296181920604_3432121002418646634_n.jpg
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  3  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 09:41 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Where is your evidence that I don't get logic?

It seems you don't have any.
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 09:43 am
@parados,
Quote:
Where is your evidence that I don't get logic?

It seems you don't have any.


o yes! just read your posting that is enough! Wink


Now about the non existent evidence for macro evolution.......

parados
 
  2  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 09:43 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Quote:
but when I ask fo revidence they can't show any!

why don't you adress that, mate?


It has been addressed. I asked for your evidence that no evidence has been presented. You provided no evidence to support your claim. It seems you are talking nonsense since you can't provide evidence for the claim you made. Why don't you address that, mate?
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 09:45 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Quehoniaomath wrote:

Quote:
Where is your evidence that I don't get logic?

It seems you don't have any.


o yes! just read your posting that is enough! Wink


Now about the non existent evidence for macro evolution.......



I ask for evidence and you provide none. I wonder that that says about your claim?
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 09:47 am
@parados,
Quote:
I ask for evidence and you provide none. I wonder that that says about your claim?


oh my! you really don't get it!

once again, it is up to the religious evolutionists to come up with evidence

not me mate! i don't claim any theory to be true. I clain evolution0shite-bullocks to be wrong because of lack of evidence

what is there not to 'grok', o little one?

show me the evidence and i will accept evolution.

till that time.....

parados
 
  2  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 10:01 am
@Quehoniaomath,
So, you are not going to offer evidence? Oh well. It seems you you don't 'grok' the meaning of "evidence."

WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE?
McGentrix
 
  2  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 10:39 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Quehoniaomath wrote:

Quote:
I ask for evidence and you provide none. I wonder that that says about your claim?


oh my! you really don't get it!

once again, it is up to the religious evolutionists to come up with evidence

not me mate! i don't claim any theory to be true. I clain evolution0shite-bullocks to be wrong because of lack of evidence

what is there not to 'grok', o little one?

show me the evidence and i will accept evolution.

till that time.....




Back to my evidence... when looking in the mirror, do you see a person that exists in the only state that it ever existed because God deemed it so, or do you see an animal that has evolved over millions of years to the current form that reflects back at you?

If the former, I'd say we are done here. If the later, I'd say you are just arguing for the sake of arguing and if something else, please elucidate.
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 10:52 am
@McGentrix,
Quote:
Back to my evidence... when looking in the mirror, do you see a person that exists in the only state that it ever existed because God deemed it so, or do you see an animal that has evolved over millions of years to the current form that reflects back at you?

If the former, I'd say we are done here. If the later, I'd say you are just arguing for the sake of arguing and if something else, please elucidate.


God???? You really don't read my postings do you now?

I am not talking about god at all! I am only talking about a lack of evidence.
where the **** did god came in the equation? I never mentioned her!? Wink

for the latter part, that really , really is a circular reasoning, hence not worth a cent.


my two cents. Wink
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 10:54 am
@parados,
oh my! you really don't get it!

once again, it is up to the religious evolutionists to come up with evidence

not me mate! i don't claim any theory to be true. I claim evolution0shite-bullocks to be wrong because of lack of evidence

what is there not to 'grok', o little one?

show me the evidence and i will accept evolution.

till that time.....
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 10:56 am
Actually it is very easy.

If the evolutionists can't deliver the goodies......


bye bye stupid theory
McGentrix
 
  3  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 11:03 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Quehoniaomath wrote:

God???? You really don't read my postings do you now?

I am not talking about god at all! I am only talking about a lack of evidence.
where the **** did god came in the equation? I never mentioned her!? Wink

for the latter part, that really , really is a circular reasoning, hence not worth a cent.

my two cents. Wink


I noticed you didn't answer the question. Please do so.
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 11:09 am
@McGentrix,
Quote:
I noticed you didn't answer the question. Please do so.


Please specify your question correctly and precisely. Thank you.
Briancrc
 
  3  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 11:30 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Quote:
If the evolutionists can't deliver the goodies......


Your lack of argument has been crushed by the overwhelming evidence in favor of evolution. You still haven't explained chromosome 2 in humans.
Briancrc
 
  3  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 11:33 am
@Briancrc,
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/71/Chromosome2_merge.png
Quote:
Fusion of ancestral chromosomes left distinctive remnants of telomeres, and a vestigial centromere
Quote:
According to researcher J. W. IJdo, "We conclude that the locus cloned in cosmids c8.1 and c29B is the relic of an ancient telomere-telomere fusion and marks the point at which two ancestral ape chromosomes fused to give rise to human chromosome 2."
Briancrc
 
  4  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 11:39 am
@Briancrc,
Quote:
"In fact, on cross-examination, Professor Behe was questioned concerning his 1996 claim that science would never find an evolutionary explanation for the immune system. He was presented with fifty-eight peer-reviewed publications, nine books, and several immunology textbook chapters about the evolution of the immune system; however, he simply insisted that this was still not sufficient evidence of evolution, and that it was not "good enough."


LOL Laughing
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Sat 7 Nov, 2015 11:56 am
@Briancrc,
Aha, quahog is simply channeling Behe? He's kind of Behe-lite., very very lite.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 3.39 seconds on 11/23/2024 at 06:12:25