Why do people deny evolution?

With the crafting of tools for a specific purpose or art in the different gene types of neanderthals and homosapiens its plain to see evolution by relativity from a common ancestor. God designs by relativity in physics and biology there is no differents they are indistiushable. God and relativity are indistinguishable as nonlocality.

martinies wrote:

Wars are caused by localised identity true identity is nonlocal identity or love . Love is relativity.. Relativity is nonlocality.

The exquisite corpse shall drink the new wine.

That said, who do you favor for the new stealth bomber contract for the Air Force?

Me, I'm hoping for Northrup Grumman, with GE engines.

Chicken study reveals evolution can happen much faster than thought
October 27, 2015

A new study of chickens overturns the popular assumption that evolution is only visible over long time scales. By studying individual chickens that were part of a long-term pedigree, the scientists led by Professor Greger Larson at Oxford University's Research Laboratory for Archaeology, found two mutations that had occurred in the mitochondrial genomes of the birds in only 50 years. For a long time scientists have believed that the rate of change in the mitochondrial genome was never faster than about 2% per million years. The identification of these mutations shows that the rate of evolution in this pedigree is in fact 15 times faster. In addition, by determining the genetic sequences along the pedigree, the team also discovered a single instance of mitochondrial DNA being passed down from a father. This is a surprising discovery, showing that so-called 'paternal leakage' is not as rare as previously believed.
The study is published in the online early version of the journal, Biology Letters.
Using a well-documented 50-year pedigree of a population of White Plymouth Rock chickens developed at Virginia Tech by Professor Paul Siegel, the researchers reconstructed how the mitochondrial DNA passed from mothers to daughters within the population. They did this by analysing DNA from the blood samples of 12 chickens of the same generation using the most distantly related maternal lines, knowing that the base population had started from seven partially inbred lines. A selective mating approach within the population started in 1957, resulting in what is now an over tenfold difference in the size of the chickens in the two groups when weighed at 56 days old.
Senior author Professor Larson said: "Our observations reveal that evolution is always moving quickly but we tend not to see it because we typically measure it over longer time periods. Our study shows that evolution can move much faster in the short term than we had believed from fossil-based estimates. Previously, estimates put the rate of change in a mitochondrial genome at about 2% per million years. At this pace, we should not have been able to spot a single mutation in just 50 years, but in fact we spotted two."
...

i agree. it is mathematically extremely simple to calculate the impossibility of macro evolution.

when you use math it is even easier to see that the longer the time the less likely it is that some things happen!

But eh, ever met a biologist who understand statistical math?

of course they have to ignore that. It will destroy the whole of evolution and for some that is a scary thought!

Frank Apisa wrote:

Why do you suppose men have nipples?

BTW, what is that weird dot in FBM's avatar?