132
   

Why do people deny evolution?

Forums: Evolution, Science, Religion, Mental Health, Inquiring Minds
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Thu 29 Oct, 2015 12:08 am
@McGentrix,
I went back and read Gunga's post and it doesn't really mean a lot. I get the point that the author is making in that mutations need o appear in both parents and locality and sex and all, but if you step back and look at the big picture that happened ages ago. Man has been pretty stagnant for awhile and I blame both intelligence and technology for it.

intelligent? yrvhnology? why?
btw technology is NOT because of modern science. Far far from it.
martinies
 
  1  
Thu 29 Oct, 2015 02:27 am
@izzythepush,
The only real thing in existance is tao. Tao is split to make the opposite s of yin and yang but tao remains as its self the relativity in the yin n yang arangments. This means relativity is the only real thing in the yin n yang illusion construct. Consciousness is pure relativity or tao. Tao is the god that constructed dna with an anticlockwise helix. Anti clockwise is yin or female.
martinies
 
  1  
Thu 29 Oct, 2015 03:09 am
@martinies,
Can you see evolution fits well with tao philosophy and christianity in its true form is taoism.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  2  
Thu 29 Oct, 2015 06:06 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Quehoniaomath wrote:

intelligent? technology? why?
btw technology is NOT because of modern science. Far far from it.


Well, you are begging the question... why is technology NOT because of modern science? From what I have seen, it is usually as a DIRECT result of modern science.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Thu 29 Oct, 2015 06:44 am
@McGentrix,
McG...Izzy...

...it just reminded me of a picture of Mercury transiting the sun.

Here is one that I found on Google...and it does look sorta like it:

http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/162674main_mercury_transit_1024.jpg
izzythepush
 
  0  
Thu 29 Oct, 2015 07:08 am
@Frank Apisa,
If I'd known I'd set off Marty I'd've kept schtum.
martinies
 
  1  
Thu 29 Oct, 2015 07:16 am
@izzythepush,
Ha.
martinies
 
  1  
Thu 29 Oct, 2015 10:43 am
@martinies,
The truth hurts.fbm knows I speak the truth cos hes a buddhist.
martinies
 
  1  
Fri 30 Oct, 2015 07:24 am
@martinies,
The relativity in buddhist texts which can lead a studier to nirvana is the nirvana in the texts of buddhism which lead the studier to nirvana.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  2  
Fri 30 Oct, 2015 02:05 pm
Studier is not a word in English. We commonly employ student.

You need to lay off the drugs, you're making even less sense than usual, and that's quite an accomplishment.
Ragman
 
  1  
Fri 30 Oct, 2015 02:19 pm
@Setanta,
..but that's because it's a non-local event, right?
martinies
 
  1  
Fri 30 Oct, 2015 02:36 pm
@Ragman,
You got it in one ragman. The relativity in anything local is nonlocal and that includes the truth about nirvana in buddhist texts. Relativity is nirvana.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Fri 30 Oct, 2015 03:12 pm
@McGentrix,
Quote:
Well, you are begging the question... why is technology NOT because of modern science? From what I have seen, it is usually as a DIRECT result of modern science.


Just show me one thing that is, allegedly, because of 'modern science' and I am pretty sure I can show it isn't.


Or let me put it in aother way, how do you know for certain that technology is from 'modern science'?

anyway, I can assure you it isn't.
McGentrix
 
  2  
Fri 30 Oct, 2015 03:35 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
Quehoniaomath wrote:

Quote:
Well, you are begging the question... why is technology NOT because of modern science? From what I have seen, it is usually as a DIRECT result of modern science.


Just show me one thing that is, allegedly, because of 'modern science' and I am pretty sure I can show it isn't.


Or let me put it in aother way, how do you know for certain that technology is from 'modern science'?

anyway, I can assure you it isn't.


Microwave ovens and computers?

I will await your reply.
Setanta
 
  2  
Fri 30 Oct, 2015 04:58 pm
@Ragman,
You should be ashamed of yourself for encouraging him. I know you're just doing it in a blatant case of self-amuse.
Briancrc
 
  1  
Fri 30 Oct, 2015 07:10 pm
@McGentrix,
Quote:
Microwave ovens and computers?


I heard Jesus invented lasers.
martinies
 
  1  
Fri 30 Oct, 2015 11:35 pm
@Setanta,
Setanta.. God (nonlocality) created relative difference (locality) and still is creating and changing things by relative difference including dna. That is plain to see.
0 Replies
 
FBM
 
  3  
Fri 30 Oct, 2015 11:44 pm
@Briancrc,
Briancrc wrote:

Quote:
Microwave ovens and computers?


I heard Jesus invented lasers.


This is legit. I once went to a Dark Side of the Moon laser light show and saw God.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Sat 31 Oct, 2015 12:28 am
@McGentrix,
Quote:
Microwave ovens and computers?

I will await your reply.


No, they were invented wayway way way before 'modern science'!
AND NOT by academians, mind you. They are too stupid!



Anyway

Quote:
THE MICROWAVE OVEN WAS INVENTED BY ACCIDENT BY A MAN WHO WAS ORPHANED AND NEVER FINISHED GRAMMAR SCHOOL

(..)he began learning what he could about it and managed to become one of three people who were hired to install electricity in the plant, despite having never received any formal training in electrical engineering nor even finishing grammar school.(..)

http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2011/08/the-microwave-oven-was-invented-by-accident-by-a-man-who-was-orphaned-and-never-finished-grammar-school/


Quote:
The company Spencer was working for, Raytheon, then filed a patent on October 8, 1945 for a microwave cooking oven, eventually named the Radarange.


You see, no stupid academic in sight!

And so it is with ALL technology including the transistor and computer.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Sat 31 Oct, 2015 05:17 am
Bullshit

0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion? - Discussion by wandeljw
Latest Challenges to the Teaching of Evolution - Discussion by wandeljw
U.S. Lags World in Grasp of Genetics and Acceptance of Evolution - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Is the theory of evolution correct? - Question by kampung
More (much more) dinosaur soft tissue turning up - Discussion by gungasnake
Miss USA delegates on evolution in schools - Discussion by hingehead
Is Evolution a Dangerous Idea? If so, why? - Discussion by edgarblythe
Future of evolution - Question by elletheduck
Don't tell me there's no proof for evolution - Discussion by aperson
Armored fish: yet another body blow to evolosers and evoloserism - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Why do people deny evolution?
  3. » Page 370
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.61 seconds on 11/23/2024 at 06:30:57
▲ ▼