132

# Why do people deny evolution?

2
Sat 17 Oct, 2015 10:50 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Do you believe there is evidence for micro evolution? A simple yes or no will suffice.
Quehoniaomath

1
Sat 17 Oct, 2015 10:53 am
Quote:
Do you believe there is evidence for micro evolution? A simple yes or no will suffice.

I don't believe. And yes there is micro evolution.

5
Sat 17 Oct, 2015 10:59 am
@Quehoniaomath,
So there is evidence of evolution then. That means you are simply arguing that evolution can't occur often enough to cause new species.
martinies

-1
Sat 17 Oct, 2015 07:15 pm
There are ten different dimensions. The tenth is the difference in the other nine.
0 Replies

Quehoniaomath

-2
Sat 17 Oct, 2015 11:35 pm
Quote:
So there is evidence of evolution then.

yes, micro evolution

Quote:
That means you are simply arguing that evolution can't occur often enough to cause new species.

There is just no evidence.Difficult eh?
MontereyJack

6
Sun 18 Oct, 2015 01:37 am
@Quehoniaomath,
You.are very silly.
0 Replies

5
Sun 18 Oct, 2015 09:14 am
@Quehoniaomath,
So you continue to argue that no one can count to 1,000,000 because you only have evidence they can count to 10.

How many micro evolution steps does it take to get to macro evolution? 10? 100? 1,000? 10,000? 1,000,000?
Below viewing threshold (view)
martinies

0
Mon 19 Oct, 2015 02:25 am
@coldjoint,
The tenth dimension is the designer of form change in the event. The tenth dimension is the relativity between the difference in the event on going. The neutral nonmoving thing in the event can be seen as the relativity in the event or difference.
martinies

1
Mon 19 Oct, 2015 12:51 pm
@martinies,
Yeah the tenth dimension runs the whole show everything top t bottom the moving changing things such as dna owe there presents to the unmoving tenth dimension which upholds and presents all the other dimensions and acts as consciousness in them to give life. Life is the tenth.
0 Replies

Joe Sixpack

1
Mon 19 Oct, 2015 02:00 pm
So there is evidence of evolution then. That means you are simply arguing that evolution can't occur often enough to cause new species
Big difference.
Real big.
InfraBlue

1
Mon 19 Oct, 2015 02:54 pm
@Joe Sixpack,
neologist wrote:

So there is evidence of evolution then. That means you are simply arguing that evolution can't occur often enough to cause new species
Big difference.
Real big.

Explain yourself.

0
Mon 19 Oct, 2015 02:57 pm
@Joe Sixpack,
Plate tectonics is a scam. Sure we can see some plates move a couple of centimetres a year but extrapolating that the good old USA came from Pangaea, through Laurasia is laughable. All the evidence is misconstrued. And the bible never mentions it. Ergo, it's codswallop.
neologist

1
Mon 19 Oct, 2015 03:02 pm
@InfraBlue,
Do you really need someone to explain the galactic chasm between adaptation and speciation?
neologist

1
Mon 19 Oct, 2015 03:23 pm
. . . And the bible never mentions it. Ergo, it's codswallop.
And by golly them wallops really hurt, hingey. I don't think my fish will ever recover. The bible didn't explain gravity, either. Sure glad our ancestors didn't float off into space. . .

Oh, wait.
The bible wasn't written as a scientific treatise. It was written so the least sophisticated of us would understand why we have war and crime and sickness and death, things difficult for many smart folks to understand. He left development of technology to the application of human ingenuity.

That's why we can build those fantastic computers but can't cure mental illness.
InfraBlue

1
Mon 19 Oct, 2015 03:26 pm
@neologist,
Don't assume that your conflation of "microevolution" with "adaptation" is obvious to others. They are not the same thing.
neologist

1
Mon 19 Oct, 2015 03:32 pm
@InfraBlue,
OK, not obvious.
InfraBlue

1
Mon 19 Oct, 2015 04:48 pm
@neologist,
Thank you.
Briancrc

2
Mon 19 Oct, 2015 06:46 pm
@Quehoniaomath,

Briancrc
Wed 14 Oct, 2015 07:21 pm
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
No evidence no macro evolution.

You failed to address each of these
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/

Quehoniaomath
Wed 14 Oct, 2015 11:18 pm
Quote:
@Briancrc,
yes, your right, I missed that one.
I will adress some flaws in it.

Have you addressed the 29 "evidences" for macroevolution yet?