@parados
Quote:
You mean the recognizing that it CAN explain it?
Evolutionary history
Multicellularity has evolved independently at least 46 times,[4][5] including in some prokaryotes, like cyanobacteria, myxobacteria, actinomycetes, Magnetoglobus multicellularis or Methanosarcina. However, complex multicellular organisms evolved only in six eukaryotic groups: animals, fungi, brown algae, red algae, green algae, and land plants.[6] It evolved repeatedly for Chloroplastida (green algae and land plants), once or twice for animals, once for brown algae, three times in the fungi (chytrids, ascomycetes and basidiomycetes)[7] and perhaps several times for slime molds, and red algae.[8]
The first evidence of multicellularity is from cyanobacteria-like organisms that lived between 3 and 3.5 billion years ago.[4] In order to reproduce, true multicellular organisms must solve the problem of regenerating a whole organism from germ cells (i.e. sperm and egg cells), an issue that is studied in developmental biology.
Talking general bubbling is cheap.
Explain the process. Start with the single cell alone. This single cell associated itself with others or evolved into something more complex? How? Show at least another thing in nature that can be used to back up your idea.
Look, evidence can be interpreted in several forms, but only the one that carries a credible and testable (when it applies) explanation , is the idea that becomes accepted.
I laugh of ignorant people who reject the acceptance of being descendants of a human being like the legendary Noah, and instead they prefer to believe that they are descendants of a monkey. Lol.
I want you to explain the process from a cell to a monkey, before humans. (Don't come here with semantics that there is no monkey but apes and similar more bubbling. Lets call it "the monkey" and play with it.
So, you have the single cell. What is next right after that? (step by step)
