@Frank Apisa,
Quote:I have no idea...but you obviously do care, since you are discussing it with me. I certainly care what you think...which is why I am discussing it with you.
i am discussing anything with anyone, because i don't care about anything. what i personally think about the discussions varies, yours are just deadened, boring, easy responses to your repetitive, similar arguments based on simple paradoxes and contradictions.
Quote:non duality is not a belief.
Quote:Yeah...like a goose is not a bird!
no, like 'a lack of birds is not a bird' is the correct analogy. non duality is a lack of beliefs, including the belief that 'non duality is the best pathway in life'. that may be the hardest belief to kick away, after understanding the concept of non duality, but it still must go eventually.
Quote:Yup...but you also have asserted that there "is" "nothingness." And that is sorta like the assertion of the Virgin Mary being assumed bodily into Heaven...although even less logical.
wrong. the logic of your virgin mary story i have no idea, nor do i care. here is the logic of nothingness:
right now, in your experience, something exists. what is it? you can call it your consciousness. so that is the basis by which you say 'somethingness' definitely exists, and nothingness cannot exist.
but that same consciousness is completely absent in deep sleep. so, it becomes nothingness, by itself. so that is a LOGICALLY deduced example of nothingness, based on how we define 'somethingness' in the first place. of course, the consciousness keeps reappearing every morning, (or afternoon depending on lifestyle), but that is not proof of its absolute existence. it is simply proof that there is a certain medium in which waking and sleep states keep alternating. some of the sleep states are entirely devoid of any consciousness, and therefore do constitute a 'nothingness' experience.
now, if you say 'somethingness' is matter, not consciousness, then we can also easily conceptualise the absence of matter, ie pure space. all physics points to this idea as the basis for all matter, but some pseudo scientists like fil will claim that empty space does not exist, energy fields permeate all of space. even if this is true, where are the energy fields existing? in some more subtle space which contains them. no matter how deep we go into particles or energy fields, the potential for an emptier, deeper space will always exist. because nothingness is infinite.
Quote:the idea that 'nothingness is everything' and explains the entirety of existence is not so simple and easy to prove,
Quote:Ya think???
It seems to me to be just about impossible to prove...and you have done a stellar job of not "proving" it. So why do you continue to assert it as though you KNOW it is so?
i like your description, that i have 'not proven' it. that is the only way it can paradoxically be proven.
i assert it as though i know it is so, primarily because you interpret it that way, but secondarily because of course i do FEEL that i know it is so. however, i am aware of the limited nature of the feeling and belief in supposed 'knowledge'. my opinion on knowledge would be that it does not exist absolutely, only relatively, just like all other concepts.
Quote:it is in fact impossible to prove with concepts, but it is an inevitable final realisation in all human consciousness.
Quote:Yeah...like the assumption of the Virgin Mary into Heaven is!!
you will have to explain that **** to me to get me to comment further on it. but i have already explained the logic of nothingness, and can go on FOREVER with it, no matter how long you argue and provide illustrations of how 'stupid' it sounds to you, blah blah. nothing will stop me. keep trying.