Deliver us from Democrats

Democrats of course. Poof. Just like that. Now I'm off to pray that all the femfolk who are not willing to sport with me vanish as well.

The leaders of the modern Democratic Party, Hannity says, have made excuses for evil for so long that they cannot recognize evil anymore. The closest thing to it in their vocabulary would be "someone who wears fur." And of course, they recognize evil in the person of "George W. Bush," whom they see as the very essence of evil. In fact, Bush may be the only force of evil in the world liberals haven't wanted to appease.

scrat. You believe the BS on the top of the page? If you do, additional remedial training will be useless on you.
I only stopped by to give my honest opinion about your Mr Hannity. I dont get my history from Hannity and dont get my science from Limbaugh. Yet that doesnt mean that I cant hear such "information" oft repeated from the pre-programmed fans of both.
You rant on girl. Ill just sit here and smile quietly.

Foxfyre wrote:

Everybody accuses anything supporting Bush of being drivel, BS, and lies. But with few exceptions, nobody says why they are.

Hannity is drivel because.

Quote:

Hannity says we face moral choices between good and evil every day. If we make excuses for evil - Hitler was a "madman," a pedophile priest was "weak" or, as philandering actor Ethan Hawke recently advised us, Bill Clinton "suffered from" infidelity - soon we cease being able to distinguish good from evil at all. (I would add to the excuses for evil, "It's just about sex.") With each choice we make, large and small, we take a step closer to the devil or a step closer to God.

If you can not see the point, nothing I can say will change your mind.

Sean Hannity is an extreme right wing waco. I'm surprised anybody takes him seriously. He'd probably more off his rocker than Limbaugh was. At lest Limbaugh had an excuse because he was drugged out. What's Hanity's excuse?

Quote:

The leaders of the modern Democratic Party, Hannity says, have made excuses for evil for so long that they cannot recognize evil anymore. The closest thing to it in their vocabulary would be "someone who wears fur." And of course, they recognize evil in the person of "George W. Bush," whom they see as the very essence of evil. In fact, Bush may be the only force of evil in the world liberals haven't wanted to appease.

They, they, they. That is what's wrong with it. He lumps all liberals together, hoping to incite argument and controversy. How can anybody take anything he says as anything more than a provocation when he says crap like this?

Generalizations, yeah, that's where the truth lies, right?

"The closest thing to [evil] in their vocabulary would be "someone who wears fur."